Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 772, Issue 1, pp 103–115 | Cite as

Impact of mining and industrial pollution on stream macroinvertebrates: importance of taxonomic resolution, water geochemistry and EPT indices for impact detection

  • Ian A. Wright
  • Michelle M. Ryan
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

This study investigated freshwater macroinvertebrate communities in waterways contaminated by active and abandoned mining and industrial activities in order to ascertain any impact on freshwater ecosystems. We compared macroinvertebrate communities at the species, family and order levels of taxonomic resolution. We also collected water samples to compare ionic composition and metal concentrations from waste-affected and reference (non-affected) sites. In addition to assessing ecological impairment, the study also sought to determine whether the degree of sensitivity in detecting any impairment varied according to the taxonomic level of identification used. We calculated the biotic indices of EPT richness and taxonomic richness at the species, family and order levels, and performed multivariate analyses to measure differences in community structure at all three levels. We found significant differences in both biotic indices and macroinvertebrate community structure at each taxonomic level, indicating ecological impairment at waste-affected sites. We also concluded that the most appropriate taxonomic level for evaluating macroinvertebrates depends on the information required. In this study, the family level provided the clearest assessment of ecological impairment at waterways affected by mining and/or industrial wastes, and order-level data provided only a marginally less sensitive measure of this impairment.

Keywords

Water quality Heavy metals Reference sites Ecosystem health Taxonomic sufficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The macroinvertebrate identifications for this study were undertaken by Chris P. Madden (Freshwater Macroinvertebrates, South Australia). Western Sydney University provided access to laboratories, vehicles and field testing meters. Sampling was undertaken with the permission of NSW National Parks and Wildlife Services (Scientific Research Collection Permit).

References

  1. ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council), 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine waters. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association), 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, P. D., 1980. The effects of mine drainage and organic enrichment on benthos in the River Nent system, Northern Pennines. Hydrobiologia 74: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, R. C., R. H. Norris & T. B. Reynoldson, 2001. Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartram, J. & R. Balance, 1996. A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Water Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  6. Birch, G., M. Siaka & C. Owens, 2001. The source of anthropogenic heavy metals in fluvial sediments of a rural catchment: Coxs River, Australia. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 126: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BOM Bureau of Meteorology, 2014. Monthly Climate Statistics, Katoomba and Lithgow. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/, Accessed 27 December 2015.
  8. Buss, D. F. & A. S. Vitorino, 2010. Rapid bioassessment protocols using benthic macroinvertebrates in Brazil: evaluation of taxonomic sufficiency. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chessman, B. C., 1995. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, K. R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, K. R. & M. Ainsworth, 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92: 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements, W. H. & P. M. Kiffney, 1995. The influence of elevation on benthic community responses to heavy metals in Rocky Mountain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1966–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clements, W. H., D. M. Carlisle, J. M. Lazorchak & P. C. Johnson, 2000. Heavy metals structure benthic communities in Colorado mountain streams. Ecological Applications 10: 626–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cranston, P. S., 1990. Biomonitoring and invertebrate taxonomy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 14: 265–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cremin, A., 1989. The growth of an industrial valley: lithgow, New South Wales. Australian Historical Archaeology 7: 35–42.Google Scholar
  16. DEST (Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories) EPA, and WRDC, 1994. River Bioassessment Manual, Version 1.0, National River Processes and Management Program, Monitoring River Health Initiative. Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Environment Protection Agency, and Land and Water Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, W. & B. Chiswell, 1996. Review of aquatic monitoring program design. Water Research 30: 1935–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, D., 1985. Taxonomic sufficiency in pollution assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 16: 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferraro, S. T. & F. A. Cole, 1990. Taxonomic level and sample size sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the Southern Californian Bight macrobenthos. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Science 49: 1184–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fairweather, P. G., 1990. Sewage and the biota on seashores: assessment of impact in relation to natural variability. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 14: 197–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerhardt, A., L. Janssens de Bisthoven & A. Soares, 2004. Macroinvertebrate response to acid mine drainage: community metrics and on-line behavioural toxicity bioassay. Environmental Pollution 130: 263–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gower, A. M., G. Myers, M. Kent & M. E. Foulkes, 1994. Relationships between macroinvertebrate communities and environmental variables in metal-contaminated streams in south-west England. Freshwater Biology 32: 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, K. & I. A. Wright, 2012. The potential and reality of the Environment Protection Licensing system in NSW: the case of water pollution. Environmental Planning and Law Journal 29: 359–372.Google Scholar
  24. Gray, J. S., K. R. Clarke, R. M. Warwick & G. Hobbs, 1990. Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: an example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oilfields, North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, N. F. & E. Delaney, 2008. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate indices for the assessment of the impact of acid mine drainage on an Irish river below an abandoned C- S mine. Environmental Pollution 155: 3140.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, N. F. & E. Delaney, 2010. Measuring community response of benthic macroinvertebrates in an erosional river impacted by acid mine drainage by use of a simple model. Ecological Indicators 10: 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray, D. P. & J. S. Harding, 2012. Acid Mine Drainage Index (AMDI): a benthic invertebrate biotic index for assessing coal mining impacts in New Zealand streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 46: 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawking, J.H., 2000. A preliminary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates form Australian freshwaters. Identification Guide No. 2 (2nd Edition), Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury.Google Scholar
  29. Hewlett, R., 2000. Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hickey, C. W. & W. H. Clements, 1998. Effects of heavy metals on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in New Zealand streams. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17: 2338–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, D. B., 2003. Chemical and microbiological characteristics of mineral spoils and drainage waters at abandoned coal and metal mines. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 3: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jolly, V. H. & M. A. Chapman, 1966. A preliminary biological study of the effects of pollution on Farmers’s Creek and Cox’s River, New South Wales. Hydrobiologia 27: 160–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenat, D. R. & D. L. Penrose, 1996. History of the EPT taxa richness metric. Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society 13: 305–307.Google Scholar
  34. Lenat, D. R. & V. H. Resh, 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecology – The benefits of genus- and species-level identifications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackey, A. P., 1988. The biota of the River Dee (central Queensland, Australia) in relation to the effects of acid mine drainage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 99: 9–19.Google Scholar
  36. Malmqvist, B. & P. Hoffsten, 1999. Influence of drainage from old mine deposits on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in central Swedish streams. Water Research 33: 2415–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MDFRC (Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre), 2013. Draft index of keys. http://www.mdfrc.org.au/bugguide/resources/Draft_Index_of_Keys_MDFRC.pdf, Accessed 27 December 2015.
  38. Napier, G. M., 1992. Application of laboratory-derived data to natural aquatic ecosystems. PhD thesis. Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  39. Norris, R. H., P. S. Lake & R. Swain, 1982. Ecological effects of mine effluents on the South Esk River, north-eastern Tasmania (III). Benthic macroinvertebrates. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33: 789–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pond, G. J., M. E. Passmore, F. A. Borsuk, L. Reynolds & C. J. Rose, 2008. Downstream effects of mountaintop coal mining: comparing biological conditions using family – and genus-level macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Resh, V. H. & J. D. Unzicker, 1975. Water Quality Monitoring and Aquatic Organisms: the Importance of Species Identification. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 47: 9–19.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Short, T., J. A. Black & W. J. Birge, 1990. Effects of acid-mine drainage on the chemical and biological character of an alkaline headwater stream. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 19: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sloane, P. I. W. & R. H. Norris, 2003. Relationship of AUSRIVAS-based macroinvertebrate predictive model outputs to a metal pollution gradient. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. UNESCO, 2009. Greater blue mountains area. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/917/, Accessed 27 December 2015.
  46. Warwick, R. M., 1988. The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 19: 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warwick, R. M., 1993. Environmental impact studies on marine communities: pragmatical considerations. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winner, R. W., J. S. Van Dyke, N. Caris & M. P. Farrell, 1975. Response of the macroinvertebrate fauna to a copper gradient in an experimental polluted stream. Vereiningung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 19: 2121–2127.Google Scholar
  49. Winterbourn, M. J., 1998. Insect faunas of acidic coal mine drainages in Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Entomologist 21: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, I. A., B. C. Chessman, P. G. Fairweather & L. J. Benson, 1995. Measuring the impact of sewage effluent on the macroinvertebrate community of an upland stream: the effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright, I. A. & S. Burgin, 2009a. Comparison of sewage and coal-mine wastes on stream macroinvertebrates within an otherwise clean upland catchment, south-eastern Australia. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 204: 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, I. A. & S. Burgin, 2009b. Effects of organic and heavy-metal pollution on chironomids within a pristine upland catchment. Hydrobiologia 635: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, I. A., S. A. Wright, K. Graham & S. Burgin, 2011. Environmental protection and management: a water pollution case study within the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. Land Use Policy 28: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright-Stow, A. E. & M. J. Winterbourn, 2010. How well do New Zealand’s stream monitoring indicators, the macroinvertebrate community index and its quantitative variant correspond? New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37: 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Younger, P. L., 2004. Environmental impacts of coal mining and associated wastes: a geochemical perspective. Geological Society, London, Special Publication 236: 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and HealthUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithUSA

Personalised recommendations