Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 764, Issue 1, pp 259–270 | Cite as

Review of the cyanobacterial genera implying planktic species after recent taxonomic revisions according to polyphasic methods: state as of 2014

  • Jiří Komárek
PHYTOPLANKTON & SPATIAL GRADIENTS Review Paper

Abstract

The criteria for taxonomic classification of cyanobacteria were radically changed in the last few decades after application of data obtained from EM studies and after use of phylogenetic analyses, mainly derived from molecular sequencing. These changes provided important knowledge of phylogeny of cyanobacteria, and they must be also expressed in the systematic review, usable for ecologists and experimental laboratories. This paper presents short descriptions of modern families with cyanobacterial genera containing planktic types after the latest revisions. The phylogenetic position of the main planktic genera was revised and controlled.

Keywords

Planktic cyanobacteria Taxonomy Polyphasic approach Modern evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks to all who help prepare and finish this article, especially to J. Komárková and D. Švehlová. This study was supported as a long-term research development project No. RVO 67985939. The language correction was made by K. Edwards.

References

  1. Barker, G. L. A., A. Konopka, B. A. Hanley & P. K. Hayes, 2000. Genetic variation in Aphanizomenon (Cyanobacteria) colonies from the Baltic Sea and North America. Journal of Phycology 36: 947–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chisholm, S. W., S. L. Frankel, R. Goericke, R. J. Olson, B. Palenik, J. B. Waterburry, L. Westjohnsrud & E. R. Zettler, 1992. Prochlorococcus marinus nov. gen., nov.sp., an oxyphototrphic marine prokaryote cantaining divynyl chlorophyll A and chlorophyll B. Archives of Microbiology 157: 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. da Silva Malone, C. F., D. Oliveira Alvarenga, M. F. Fiore & S. L. Sant’Anna, 2014. Towards a phylogenetic position for the morphologically-defined genus Pannus (Cyanobacteria). Nova Hedwigia 99(3/4): 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dadheech, P. K., A. Balot, P. Casper, K. Kotut, E. Novelo, B. Lemma, T. Preschold & L. Krienitz, 2010. Phylogenetic relationship and divergence among planktonic strains of Arthrospira (Oscillatoriales, Cyanobacteria) of African, Asian and American origin deduced by 16S–23S ITS and phycocyanin operon sequences. Phycologia 49: 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dvořák, P., F. Hindák, P. Hašler, A. Hindáková & A. Poulíčková, 2014. Morphological and molecular studies of Neosynechococcus sphagnicola, gen. et sp. nov. (Cyanobacteria, Synechococcales). Phytotaxa 170(1): 24–34.Google Scholar
  6. Florenzano, G., C. Sili, E. Pelosi & M. Vicenzini, 1985. Cyanospira rippkae and Cyanospira capsulata (gen. nov. and spp. nov.): new filamentous heterocystous cyanobacteria from Magadi lake (Kenya). Archives of Microbiology 140: 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garcia-Pichel, F., U. Nübel & G. Muyzer, 1998. The phylogeny of unicellular, extremely halotolerant cyanobacteria. Archives of Microbiology 169: 469–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gkelis, S., P. Rajaniemi, E. Vardaka, M. Moustaka-Gouni, T. Lanaras & K. Sivonen, 2005. Limnothrix redekei (Van Goor) Meffert (Cyanobacteria) strains from Lake Kastoria, Greece form a separate phylogenetic group. Microbial Ecology 49: 176–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gugger, M., R. Molica, B. Le Berre, P. Dufour, C. Bernard & J. F. Humbert, 2005. Genetic diversity of Cylindrospermopsis strains (Cyanobacteria) isolated from four continents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 1097–1100.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Honda, D., A. Yokota & J. Sugiyama, 1999. Detection of seven major evolutionary lineages in cyanobacteria based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis with new sequences of five marine Synechococcus strains. Journal of Molecular Evology 48: 723–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iteman, I., R. Rippka, N. T. de Marsac & M. Herdmann, 2002. rDNA analyses of planktonic heterocystous cyanobacteria, including members of the genera Anabaenopsis and Cyanospira. Microbiology-SGM 148: 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jezberová, J. 2006. Phenotypic diversity and phylogeny of picocyanobacteria in mesotrophic and eutrophic freshwater reservoirs investigated by a cultivation-dependent polyphasic approach. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Biological Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice.Google Scholar
  13. Jezberová, J. & J. Komárková, 2007. Morphological transformation in a freshwater Cyanobium sp. induced by grassers. Environmental Microbiology 9: 1858–1862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansen J. R., N. Pietrasiak, K. Osorio-Santos, M. Bohunická, L. Miscoe, L. Kováčik & M. P. Martin, 2013. Has the time come to name cryptic species of cyanobacteria? A case study in Oculatella. In Book of Abstracts of the 19th Symposium of the International Society for Cyanophyte Research, Cleveland, Ohio: 15Google Scholar
  15. Kato, T., M. F. Watanabe & M. Watanabe, 1991. Allozyme divergence of Microcystis (Cyanophyceae) and its taxonomic inferrence. Algological Studies 64: 129–140.Google Scholar
  16. Komárek, J., 2001. Review of the cyanoprokaryotic genus Romeria. Czech Phycology 1: 5–19.Google Scholar
  17. Komárek, J., 2005. Phenotype diversity of the heterocytous cyanoprokaryotic genus Anabaenopsis. Czech Phycology 5: 1–35.Google Scholar
  18. Komárek, J., 2013. Cyanoprokaryota 3. Teil/3rd part: Heterocytous genera. In Büdel, B., G. Gärtner, L. Krienitz & M. Schagerl (eds), Süswasserflora von Mitteleuropa/Freshwater flora of Central Europe. Springer Spektrum Berlin, Heidelberg: 1130.Google Scholar
  19. Komárek, J. & F. Hindák, 1989. The genus Eucapsis (Cyanophyta/Cyanobacteria) in Czechoslovakia. Acta Hydrobiologica 31: 25–34.Google Scholar
  20. Komárek, J. & K. Anagnostidis, 1998. Cyanoprokaryota 1.Teil: Chroococcales. In Ettl, H., G. Gärtner, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/1. Gustav Fischer, Jena-Stuttgart-Lübeck-Ulm: 548.Google Scholar
  21. Komárek, J. & J. Komárková, 2002. Review of the European Microcystis-morphospecies (Cyanoprokaryotes) from nature. Czech Phycology 2: 1–24.Google Scholar
  22. Komárek, J. & J. Komárková, 2003. Phenotype diversity of the cyanoprokaryotic genus Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales); review 2002. Czech Phycology 3: 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Komárek, J. & J. Komárková, 2004. Taxonomic review of the cyanoprokaryotic genera Planktothrix and Planktothricoides. Czech Phycology 4: 1–18.Google Scholar
  24. Komárek, J. & E. Zapomělová, 2007. Planktic morphospecies of the cyanobacterial genus Anabaena = subg. Dolichospermum – 1. Part: coiled types. Fottea 7: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Komárek, J. & E. Zapomělová, 2008. Planktic morphospecies of the cyanobacterial genus Anabaena = subg. Dolichospermum – 2. Part: straight types. Fottea 8: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komárek, J., M. Hübel, H. Hübel & J. Šmarda, 1993. The Nodularia studies 2. Taxonomy. Algological Studies 68: 1–25.Google Scholar
  27. Komárek, J., S.M.F.O. Azevedo, P. Domingos, J. Komárková & M. Tichý, 2001. Background of the Caruaru tragedy; a case taxonomic study of toxic cyanobacteria. Algological Studies (Cyanobacterial Research 2) 103: 9-29.Google Scholar
  28. Komárek, J., J. Kaštovský & J. Jezberová, 2011. Phylogenetic and taxonomic delimitation of the cyanobacterial genera Aphanothece Nägeli and Anathece (Komárek et Anagnostidis) comb. nova. European Journal of Phycology 46: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Komárek, J., E. Zapomělová, J. Šmarda, J. Kopecký, E. Rejmánková, J. Woodhouse, B.A. Neilan & J. Komárková, 2013. Polyphasic evaluation of Limnoraphis robusta, a water-bloom forming cyanobacterium from Lake Atitlán, Guatemala, with a description of Limnoraphis gen. nov. Fottea 13 (1): 39–52.Google Scholar
  30. Komárek, J., J. Kaštovský, J. Mareš & J. R. Johansen, 2014. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014 according to the polyphasic approach. Preslia 86: 295–335.Google Scholar
  31. Komárková, J., M.A. Mugnai, C. Sili, O. Komárek & S. Turicchia, 2005. Stable morphospecies within the 16S rRNA monophyletic genus Microcystis (Kützing) Kützing. Algological Studies 117 (Cyanobacterial Research 6): 279–295.Google Scholar
  32. Komárková, J., J. Jezberová, O. Komárek & E. Zapomělová, 2010. Variability of Chroococcus (Cyanobacteria) morphospecies with regard to phylogenetic relationships. Hydrobiologia 639: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Komárková-Legnerová, J. & G. Cronberg, 1985. Lemmermanniella pallida (Lemm.) Geitl. from South Swedish Lakes. Algological Studies 40: 403–413.Google Scholar
  34. Li, R., W. W. Carmichael, Y. Liu & M. M. Watanabe, 2000a. Taxonomic re-evaluation of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae NH-5 based on morphology and 16S rRNA gene sequences. Hydrobiologia 438: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, R., M. Watanabe & M. M. Watanabe, 2000b. Taxonomic studies pf planktic species of Anabaena based on morphological characteristics in cultured strains. Hydrobiologia 438: 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, R., W. W. Carmichael & P. Pereira, 2003. Morphological and 16S rRNA gene evidence for reclassification of the paralytic shellfish toxin producing Aphanizomenon flos-aquae LMECYA31 as Aphanizomenon issatschenkoi (Cyanophyceae). Journal of Phycology 39: 814–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, R., S. W. Wilhelm, W. W. Carmichael & M. M. Watanabe, 2008. Polyphasic characterization of water bloom forming Raphidiopsis species (cyanobacteria) from central China. Harmful Algae 7: 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin, S., Z. X. Wu, G. L. Yu, M. L. Zhu, B. S. Yu & R. H. Li, 2010. Genetic diversity and molecular phylogeny of Planktothrix (Oscillatoriales, cyanobacteria) strains from China. Harmful Algae 9: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manen, J. F. & J. Falquet, 2002. The cpcB-cpcA locus as a tool for the genetic characterization of the genus Arthrospira (Cyanobacteria): evidence for horizontal transfer. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52: 861–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Moustaka-Gouni, M., K. A. Kormas, P. Polykarpou, S. Gkelis, D. C. Bobori & E. Vardaka, 2010. Polyphasic evaluation of Aphanizomenon issatschenkoi and Raphidiopsis mediterranea in a Mediterranean lake. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moustaka-Gouni, M., K. A. Kormas, E. Vardaka, M. Katsiapi & S. Gkelis, 2009. Raphidiopsis mediterranea Skuja represents non-heterocytous life-cycle stages of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska) Seenayya et Subba Raju in Lake Kastoria (Greece), its type locality: evidence by morphological and phylogenetic analysis. Harmful Algae 8: 864–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Niiyama, Y., A. Tuji & S. Tsujimura, 2011. Umezakia natans M.WATAN. does not belong to Stigonemataceae but to Nostocaceae. Fottea 11: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orcutt, K. M., U. Rasmussen, E. A. Webb, J. B. Waterbury, K. Gundersen & B. Bergman, 2002. Characterization of Trichodesmium spp. by genetic techniques. Applied Environmental of Microbiology 68: 2236–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osorio-Santos, K., N. Pietrasiak, M. Bohunická, L. H. Miscoe, L. Kováčik, M. P. Martin & J. R. Johansen, 2014. Seven new species of Oculatella (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria): taxonomically recognizing cryptic diversification. European Journal of Phycology 49: 450–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Otsuka, S., S. Suda, R. H. Li, M. Watanabe, H. Oyaizu, S. Matsumoto & M. M. Watanabe, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships between toxic and non-toxic strains of the genus Microcystis based on 16S to 23S internal transcribed spacer sequence. FEMS Microbiology Letters 172: 15–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Otsuka, S., S. Suda, S. Shibata, H. Oyaizu, S. Matsumoto & M. M. Watanabe, 2001. A proposal for the unification of five species of the cyanobacterial genus Microcystis Kützing ex Lemmermann 1907 under the rules of the Bacteriological Code. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 51: 873–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Palinska, K., W. Liesack, E. Rhiel & W. E. Krumbein, 1996. Phenotype variability of identical genotypes: the need for a combined approach in cyanobacterial taxonomy demonstrated on Merismopedia-like isolates. Archives of Microbiology 166: 224–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Perkerson, R. B., A. E. Perkerson & D. A. Casamatta, 2010. Phylogenetic examination of the cyanobacterial genera Geitlerinema and Limnothrix (Pseudanabaenaceae) using 16S rDNA gene sequence data. Algological Studies 134: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rajaniemi, P., P. Hrouzek, K. Kaštovská, R. Willame, A. Rantala, L. Hoffmann, J. Komárek & K. Sivonen, 2005a. Phylogenetic and morphological evaluation of the genera Anabaena. Aphanizomenon, Trichormus and Nostoc (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 55: 11–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rajaniemi, P., J. Komárek, P. Hrouzek, R. Willame, K. Kaštovská, L. Hoffmann & K. Sivonen, 2005b. Taxonomic consequences from the combined molecular and phenotype evaluation of selected Anabaena and Aphanizomenon strains. Algological Studies 117: 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rajaniemi-Wacklin, P., A. Rantala, M. A. Mugnai, S. Turicchia, S. Ventura, J. Komárková, L. Lepistö & K. Sivonen, 2006. Correspondence between phylogeny and morphology of Snowella spp. and Woronichinia naegeliana, Cyanobacteria, commonly occurring in lakes. Journal of Phycology 42: 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Řeháková, K., J. Mareš, A. Lukešová, E. Zapomělová, K. Bernardová & P. Hrouzek, 2014. Nodularia (Cyanobacteria, Nostocaceae): a phylogenetically uniform genus with variable phenotypes. Phytotaxa 172: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robertson, B. R., N. Tezuka & M. M. Watanabe, 2001. Phylogenetic analyses of Synechococcus strains (cyanobacteria) using sequences of 16S rDNA and part of the phycocyanin operon reveal multiple evolutionary lines and reflect, phycobilin content. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 51: 861–871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rueckert, A., S. A. Wood & C. Cary, 2007. Development and field assessment of a quantiative PCR for the detection and enumeration of the noxious bloom-former Anabaena planktonica. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 5: 474–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sihvonen, L. M., C. Lyra, D. P. Fewer, P. Rajaniemi-Wacklin, J. M. Lehtimaki, M. Wahlsten & K. Sivonen, 2007. Strains of the cyanobacterial genera Calothrix and Rivularia isolated from the Baltic Sea display cryptic diversity and are distantly related to Gloeotrichia and Tolypothrix. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 61: 74–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Simić, S., J. Komárek & N. Đorđević, 2014. The confirmation of the genus Glaucospira (Cyanobacteria) and the occurrence of Glaucospira laxissima (G. S. West) comb. nova in Serbia. Cryptogamie Algologie 35(3): 259–267.Google Scholar
  57. Six, Ch, J.-C. Thomas, L. Garczarek, M. Ostrowski, A. Dufresne, N. Blot, D. J. Scanlan & F. Partensky, 2007. Diversity and evolution of phycobilisomes in marine Synechococcus spp.: a comparative genomics study. Genome Biology 8(12): R259.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Stüken, A., R. J. Campbell, A. Quesada, A. Sukenik, P. K. Dadheech & C. Wiedner, 2009. Genetic and morphologic characterization of four putative cylindrospermopsin producing species of the cyanobacterial genera Anabaena and Aphanizomenon. Journal of Plankton Research 31: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suda, S., M. M. Watanabe, S. Otsuka, A. Mahakahant, W. Yongmanitchai, N. Nopartnaraporn, Y. Liu & J. G. Day, 2002. Taxonomic revision of water-bloom-forming species of oscillatorioid cyanobacteria. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52: 1577–1595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Thu, N. K., Y. Tanabe, M. Yoshida, H. Matsuura & M. M. Watanabe, 2012. Aerosakkonema funiforme gen. et sp nov (Oscillatoriales), a new gas-vacuolated oscillatorioid cyanobacterium isolated from a mesotrophic reservoir. Phycologia 51: 672–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Gremberghe, I., F. Leliaert, J. Mergay, P. Vanormelingen, K. Van der Gucht, A.-E. Debeer, G. Lacerot, L. De Meester & W. Vyverman, 2011. Lack of phylogeographic structure in the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa suggests global dispersal. PLOs One 6: 1–9.Google Scholar
  62. Wacklin, P., L. Hoffmann & J. Komárek, 2009. Nomenclatural validation fo the genetically revised cyanobacterial genus Dolichospermum (Ralfs ex Bornet et Flahault) comb. nova. Fottea 9: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Watanabe, M., 1987. Studies on the planktonic blue-green algae 2. Umezakia natans gen. et sp. nov. (Stigonemataceae) from the Mikata lakes, Fukui prefecture. Bulletin of the National Science Museum 13(3): 81–88.Google Scholar
  64. Willame, R., C. Boutte, S. Grubisić, A. Wilmotte, J. Komárek & L. Hoffmann, 2006. Morphological and molecular characterisation of planktonic cyanobacteria from Belgium and Luxembourg. Journal of Phycology 42: 1312–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zammit, G., D. Billi & P. Albertano, 2012. The subaerophytic cyanobacterium Oculatella subterranea (Oscillatoriales, Cyanophyceae) gen. et sp. nov.: a cytomorphological and molecular description. European Journal of Phycology 47(4): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zapomělová, E., K. Řeháková, P. Znachor & J. Komárková, 2007. Morphological diversity of coiled planktonic types of the genus Anabaena (cyanobacteria) in natural populations – taxonomic consequences. Cryptogamie Algologie 28(4): 353–371.Google Scholar
  67. Zapomělová, E., J. Jezberová, P. Hrouzek, D. Hisem, K. Řeháková & J. Komárková, 2009. Polyphasic characterization of three strains of Anabaena reniformis and Aphanizomenon aphanizomenoides (cyanobacteria) and their reclassification to Sphaerospermum gen. nov (incl. Anabaena kisseleviana). Journal of Phycology 45: 1363–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zapomělová, E., J. Jezberová, P. Hrouzek, D. Hisem, K. Řeháková & J. Komárková, 2010a. Polyphasic characterization of three strains of Anabaena reniformis and Aphanizomenon aphanizomenoides (cyanobacteria) and their reclassification to Sphaerospermum gen. nov (incl. Anabaena kisseleviana). Journal of Phycology 46: 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zapomělová, E., K. Řeháková, J. Jezberová & J. Komárková, 2010b. Polyphasic characterization of eight planktonic Anabaena strains (cyanobacteria) with reference to the variability of 61 Anabaena populations observed in the field. Hydrobiologia 639: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zapomělová, E., O. Skácelová, P. Pumann, R. Kopp & E. Janeček, 2012. Biogeographically interesting planktonic Nostocales (Cyanobacteria) in the Czech Republic and their polyphasic evaluation resulting in taxonomic revisions of Anabaena bergii Ostenfeld 1908 Chrysosporum gen. nov.) and A. tenericaulis Nygaard 1949 (Dolichospermum tenericaule comb. nova). Hydrobiologia 698: 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BotanyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicTřeboňCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations