Hydrobiologia

, Volume 734, Issue 1, pp 97–113 | Cite as

Biological and chemical responses in a temporarily open/closed estuary to variable freshwater inputs

Primary Research Paper

Abstract

In coastal lagoons with occasional connection to oceans, variations in physicochemical conditions and biological responses can be pronounced. To examine the influence of variable rainfall and tidal flushing, we measured, over a 4-year period, salinity, temperature and dissolved oxygen, and fish abundances, in Devereux Slough, a coastal lagoon occasionally connected to the Pacific Ocean along the California coast. We test the hypotheses that salinity is the primary influence on fish composition, and that fish density is affected by freshwater discharge and by berm breaches. During our sampled years, annual rainfall varied from 188 to 971 mm, and the sand berm separating the Slough from the ocean breached in each year except 2007, a drought period. Average yearly salinity ranged from 7.7 to 37.1 ppt. Hypoxic conditions in the near-bottom water were common each year. The best predictor of the fish composition was salinity, and an indirect correlation with fresh water discharge was responsible for much of the temporal variation in the fish assemblage. The interaction between salinity, state of the estuary mouth (open vs. closed), and precipitation significantly predicted densities of Fundulus parvipinnis (Girard 1984).

Keywords

Salinity Coastal lagoon Physicochemical conditions Fish Resource management 

References

  1. Allen, L. G. & M. H. Horn, 1975. Abundance, diversity and seasonality of fishes in Colorado Lagoon, Alamitos Bay, California. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 3: 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, R. S. K., 1980. Coastal Lagoons: The Natural History of a Neglected Habitat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, B. A., 1985. A mass mortality of fish associated with low salinity conditions in the Bot River estuary. Transactions in Royal Society South Arica 45: 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beighley, R. E., J. M. Melack & T. Dunne, 2003. Impacts of California’s climatic regimes and coastal land use change on stream flow characteristics. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 29: 1419–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, A. J., 1999. Factors influencing the structure of an estuarine fish community: the role of interspecific competition. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 1994. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, J. N., E. D. Stein, M. Sutula, R. Clark, A. E. Fetscher, L. Grenier, C. Grosso & A. Wiskind, 2008. California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) for Wetlands and Riparian Areas. www.cramwetlands.org.
  8. Davis, F. W., D. Theobald, R. Harrington & A. Parikh, 1990. Campus Wetlands Management Plan, Part 2, Technical Report on Hydrology, Water Quality and Sedimentation of West and Storke Campus Wetlands. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  9. Day, J. H., 1981. Summaries of current knowledge on 43 estuaries. Estuarine Ecology with Particular Reference to Southern Africa. A.A. Balkema, Cape Town: 259–341.Google Scholar
  10. Everett, J. D., M. Baird, & I. Suthers, 2007. Nutrient and plankton dynamics in an intermittently closed/open lagoon, Smiths Lake, south-eastern Australia: an ecological model. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72: 690–702.Google Scholar
  11. Ferren, W. R., Jr., D. Capralis & D. Hickson, 1987. Campus wetlands management plan, Part I, Technical report on the botanical resources of West and Storke Campuses. Herbarium Report No. 12, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  12. Gale, E., C. Pattiaratchi & R. Ranasinghe, 2006. Vertical mixing processes in intermittently closed and open lakes and lagoons, and the dissolved oxygen response. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 69: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gladstone, W., N. Hacking & V. Owen, 2006. Effects of artificial openings of intermittently opening estuaries on macroinvertebrate assemblages of the entrance barrier. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 67: 708–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gobler, C. J., L. A. Cullison, F. Koch, T. M. Harder & J. W. Krause, 2005. Influence of freshwater flow, ocean exchange, and seasonal cycles on phytoplankton – nutrient dynamics in a temporarily open estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65: 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodman, D., 2008. Effective estuarine management: a case study of a California estuary and its ecological and political characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara. 358 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Griffiths, S. P., 2001. Factors influencing fish composition in an Australian intermittently open estuary: is stability salinity-dependent? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52: 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heck, K. L., K. W. Able, M. P. Fahay & C. T. Romanet, 1989. Fishes and decapod crustaceans of Cape Cod eelgrass meadows: species composition, seasonal abundance patterns and comparison with unvegetated substrates. Estuaries 12: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heltshe, J. F., 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39: 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoise, G. W. & T. G. Cochran, 1994. Mesoscale distribution patterns of macrozooplankton communities in Prydz bay, Antartica- January to February 1991. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James, N. C., P. D. Cowley, A. K. Whitfield & S. Lamberth, 2007. Fish communities in temporarily open/closed estuaries from the warm- and cool-temperate regions of South Africa – a review. Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries 17: 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, M. V. & R. J. West, 2005. Spatial and temporal variability of seagrass fishes in intermittently closed and open coastal lakes in southeastern Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64: 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuris, A. M., R. F. Hechinger, J. C. Shaw1, K. L. Whitney, L. Aguirre-Macedo, C. A. Boch, A. P. Dobson, E. J. Dunham4, B. L. Fredensborg, T. C. Huspeni6, J. Lorda, L. Mababa, F. T. Mancini, A. B. Mora, M. Pickering, N. L. Talhouk, M. E. Torchin & K. D. Lafferty, 2008. Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454: 515–518.Google Scholar
  23. Kjerfve, B. (ed.), 1994. Coastal Lagoon Processes. Elsevier Oceanographic Series 60. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 577 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Lafferty, K. D., 2008. Camp Pendleton Tidewater Goby monitoring project report (2008 update). U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report.Google Scholar
  25. Lafferty, K. D., C. C. Swift & R. F. Ambrose, 1999. Extirpation and recolonization in a metapopulation of an endangered fish, the tidewater goby. Conservation Biology 13: 1447–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Largier, J. L., S. V. Smith & J. T. Hollibaugh, 1997. Seasonally hypersaline estuaries in Mediterranean-climate regions. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 45: 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magurran, A. E., 2006. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  28. McGinnis, S. M. & D. Alcorn, 2006. Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of California. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Middaugh, D. P., 1988. Salinity tolerance of young topsmelt, Atherinops affinis, cultured in the laboratory. California Fish and Game 74: 232–235.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, T. A., P. A. Montagna, J. B. Pollack, R. D. Kalke & H. R. De Yoe, 2011. The role of freshwater inflow in lagoons, rivers, and bays. Hydrobiologia 667: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, G. W. & R. E. Turner, 1994. The value of salt marsh edge vs. interior as habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh. Estuaries 17: 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pollard, D. A., 1994. A comparison of fish assemblages and fisheries in intermittently open and permanently open coastal lagoons on the south coast of New South Wales, south-eastern Australia. Estuaries 17: 631–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rountree, R. A. & K. W. Able, 1992. Fauna of polyhaline subtidal marsh creeks in southern New Jersey: composition, abundance and biomass. Estuaries 15: 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sklar, F. & J. Browder, 1998. Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Management 22: 547–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, T., J. B. Adams & P. T. Gamaa, 2006. The effect of mouth opening on the biomass and community structure of microphytobenthos in a small oligotrophic estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, K. J. & K. W. Able, 1994. Salt-marsh tide pools as winter refuges for the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, in New Jersey. Estuaries 17: 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snow, G. C. & J. B. Adams, 2007. Relating microalgal spatial patterns to flow, mouth and nutrient status in the temporarily open/closed Mngazi estuary, SouthAfrica. Marine and Freshwater Research 58: 1032–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swift, C. C., J. L. Nelson, C. Maslow & T. Stein, 1989. Biology and distribution of the tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (Pisces: Gobiidae) of California. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles, Scientific Contribution 404: 1–19.Google Scholar
  39. Teske, P. R. & T. H. Wooldridge, 2002. What limits the distribution of subtidal macrobenthos in permanently open and temporarily open/closed South African estuaries: salinity vs. sediment particle size. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USACE, 2002. HEC-RAS river analysis system, user’s manual, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis.Google Scholar
  41. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006. Draft Recovery Plan for the Endangered (Eucyclogobius newberryi). Ventura, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Whitfield, A. K., 1994. Fish species-diversity in southern African estuarine systems-An evolutionary perspective. Environmental Biology of Fish 40: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitfield, A. K., 1999. Ichthyofaunal assemblages in estuaries: a South African case study. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9: 151–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitfield, A. K., A. W. Paterson, A. H. Bok & H. M. Kok, 1994. A comparison of the ichthyofaunas in two permanently open eastern Cape estuaries. South African Journal of Zoology 29:175-1855-185.Google Scholar
  45. Young, G. C. & I. C. Potter, 2002. Influence of exceptionally high salinities, marked variations in freshwater discharge and opening of estuary mouth on the characteristics of the ichthyofauna of a mormally-closed estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young, G. C., I. C. Potter, G. A. Hyndes & S. De Lestang, 1997. The ichthyofauna of an intermittently open estuary: implications of bar breaching and low salinities on faunal composition. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45: 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bren School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.League to Save Lake TahoeSouth Lake TahoeUSA

Personalised recommendations