, Volume 727, Issue 1, pp 137–149 | Cite as

Reproductive ecology of the glacier lanternfish Benthosema glaciale

  • E. García-Seoane
  • A. Bernal
  • F. Saborido-Rey
Primary Research Paper


Myctophids play a key role in the transfer of energy in pelagic food webs, linking zooplankton to higher trophic levels. Data are presented, for the first time for the glacier lanternfish (Benthosema glaciale), on maturity ogives, size-at-maturity and reproductive strategy in terms of ovarian organization and fecundity type in two contrasting environments: North Atlantic and Mediterranean. We analysed 292 females collected in Flemish Cap during early summer 2009 and 2011 and off the Balearic Islands during late autumn 2009 and early summer 2010. The spawning season differed between areas. Size at 50% maturity in Flemish Cap was 47.6 and 49.1 mm in 2009 and 2011, respectively, but significantly smaller, 24.5 mm, in the Balearic sea. B. glaciale is a batch spawner with asynchronous ovarian development and indeterminate fecundity. Batch fecundity showed significant relationships with length and weight, although average relative batch fecundity was low (1031 ± 396 oocytes/gram). We compared two staining techniques: Hematoxylin–eosin and PAS–hematoxylin–metanil yellow with the latter being more useful to detect mature females and spawning indicators in regressing and regenerating females. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the reproductive potential and ecological role of this species, the most abundant myctophid in the northern Atlantic.


Flemish Cap Glacier lanternfish Histology Myctophidae Reproduction Western Mediterranean 



This study was possible thanks to a JAE Predoctoral Fellowship of the CSIC co-financed by the European Social Fund and thanks to the collaboration of the project IDEADOS (CTM2008-04489-C03-02) given by the Spanish Science and Innovation Ministry and of the Program for the Data Collection in the Fisheries Sector from the European Commission and CSIC. The authors are grateful to M. Fabeiro, D. Domínguez, R. Collazo, I. Ares and S. Rábade for the help given for histological processing. We thank the officers and crew of the R/V Vizconde de Eza and R/V Sarmiento de Gamboa for their assistance sampling at sea. We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments on the manuscript.


  1. Badcock, J., 1981. The significance of meristic variation in Benthosema glaciale (Pisces, Myctophoidei) and of the species distribution off northwest Africa. Deep Sea Research Part A Oceanographic Research Papers 28: 1477–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown-Peterson, N. J., D. M. Wyanski, F. Saborido-Rey, B. J. Macewicz & S. K. Lowerre-Barbieri, 2011. A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 3: 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherel, Y., C. Fontaine, P. Richard & J. P. Labat, 2010. Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 55: 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalpadado, P., 1988. Reproductive biology of the lanternfish Benthosema pterotum from the Indian Ocean. Marine Biology 98: 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domínguez-Petit, R. & F. Saborido-Rey, 2010. New bioenergetic perspective of European hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) reproductive ecology. Fisheries Research 104: 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emerson, L. S., M. Greer Walker & P. R. Witthames, 1990. A stereological method for estimating fish fecundity. Journal of Fish Biology 36: 721–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gartner Jr., J. V., 1993. Patterns of reproduction in the dominant lanternfish species (Pisces: Myctophidae) of the eastern Gulf of Mexico, with a review of reproduction among tropical–subtropical Myctophidae. Bulletin of Marine Science 52: 721–750.Google Scholar
  8. Gartner Jr., J. V., 1991. Life histories of three species of lanternfishes (Pisces: Myctophidae) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico II. Age and growth patterns. Marine Biology 111: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gjösæter, J., 1973. Age, growth, and mortality of the myctophid fish, Benthosema glaciale (Reinhardt), from Western Norway. Sarsia 52: 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. Gjøsæter, J., 1981. Growth, production and reproduction of the myctophid fish Benthosema glaciale from western Norway and adjacent seas. Fiskeridirektorates Skrifter Serie Havundersøkelser 17: 79–108.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyear, R. H., B. J. Zahuranec, W. L. Pugh & R. H. J. Gibbs, 1972. Ecology and vertical distribution of Mediterranean midwater fishes. Mediterranean Biological Studies, Final Report. 91-229.Google Scholar
  12. Halliday, R. G., 1970. Growth and vertical distribution of the glacier lanternfish, Benthosema glaciale, in the northwestern Atlantic. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 27: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulley, P. A., 1984. Myctophidae. In Whitehead, P. J. P., M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen & E. Tortonese (eds), Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. 1. UNESCO, Paris: 429–483.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, J. R., N. C. H. Lo & R. J. H. Leong, 1985. Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 36: 67–77.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, J. R. & B. J. Macewicz, 1985. Measurement of spawning frequency in multiple spawning fishes. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 36: 79–94.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, J. R., B. J. Macewicz, N. C. H. Lo & C. A. Kimbrell, 1992. Fecundity, spawning, and maturity of female Dover sole Microstomus pacificus, with an evaluation of assumptions and precision. Fishery Bulletin 90: 101–128.Google Scholar
  17. Hussain, S. M., 1992. The reproductive biology of the lantern fish Benthosema fibulatum from the northern Arabian sea. Fisheries Research 13: 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussain, S. M. & J. Ali-Khan, 1987. Fecundity of Benthosema fibulatum and Benthosema pterotum from the northern Arabian sea. Deep Sea Research Part A Oceanographic Research Papers 34: 1293–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kawaguchi, K. & J. Mauchline, 1982. Biology of myctophid fishes (Family Myctophidae) in the Rockall Trough, northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Biological Oceanography 1: 337–373.Google Scholar
  20. Kjesbu, O. S., 2009. Applied fish reproductive biology: contribution of individual reproductive potential to recruitment and fisheries management. In Jakobsen, T., M. J. Fogarty, B. A. Megrey & E. Moksness (eds), Fish Reproductive Biology and Its Implications for Assessment and Management. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK: 293–332.Google Scholar
  21. Lisovenko, L. A. & V. G. Prut’ko, 1986. Reproductive biology of Diaphus suborbitalis (Myctophidae) in the equatorial part of the Indian Ocean. 1. Nature of oogenesis and type of spawning. Journal of Ichthyology/Voprosy Ikhtiologii 4: 619–629.Google Scholar
  22. Lisovenko, L. A. & V. G. Prut’ko, 1987. Reproductive biology of Diaphus suborbitalis (Myctophidae) in the equatorial part of the Indian Ocean 2. Fecundity and reproductive potential. Journal of Ichthyology/Voprosy Ikhtiologii 1: 89–100.Google Scholar
  23. Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., N. J. Brown-Peterson, H. Murua, J. Tomkiewicz, D. M. Wyanski & F. Saborido-Rey, 2011. Emerging issues and methodological advances in fisheries reproductive biology. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 3: 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazhirina, G. P., 1988. Some information on the development of ovaries in Benthosema glaciale from different areas of the North Atlantic. NAFO Scientific Council Research Document 88(21): 1–11.Google Scholar
  25. McCullagh, P. & J. A. Nelder, 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murua, H., G. Kraus, F. Saborido-Rey, P. R. Witthames, A. Thorsen & S. Junquera, 2003. Procedures to estimate fecundity of marine fish species in relation to their reproductive strategy. Journal of Northwest Atlantic fishery science 33: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murua, H. & F. Saborido-Rey, 2003. Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic fishery science 33: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohizumi, H., T. Kuramochi, T. Kubodera, M. Yoshioka & N. Miyazaki, 2003. Feeding habits of Dall’s porpoises (Phocoenoides dalli) in the subarctic North Pacific and the Bering Sea basin and the impact of predation on mesopelagic micronekton. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 50: 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez-Rodríguez, A., 2012. An integrative study to the functioning of the Flemish Cap demersal community. PhD Thesis, University of Vigo.Google Scholar
  30. Prosch, R. M., 1991. Reproductive biology and spawning of the myctophid Lampanyctodes hectoris and the sternoptychid Maurolicus muelleri in the southern Benguela ecosystem. South African Journal of Marine Science 10: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quintero-Hunter, I., H. Grier & M. Muscato, 1991. Enhancement of histological detail using metanil yellow as counterstain in periodic acid Schiff’s hematoxylin staining of glycol methacrylate tissue sections. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 66: 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing. Viena, Austria.
  33. Rábade, S., M. Fabeiro, D. Domínguez-Vázquez, A. Alonso-Fernández, E. Cernadas, P. Carrión, N. Rufino, A. Formella, J. M. Pintor, R. Domínguez-Petit & F. Saborido-Rey, Automatic software tool to determine fish fecundity by means of a computing aided image analysis and stereology on histological images. In: Wyanski, D. M. & N. J. Brown-Peterson (eds) Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Gonadal Histology of Fishes, El Puerto de Santa Maria, Spain, 2010: 130–132.
  34. Tåning, A. V., 1918. Mediterranean Scopelidae (Saurus, Aulopus, Chlorophthalmus, and Myctophum). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908–1910 to the Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas 2: 8–45.Google Scholar
  35. Van Noord, J. E., 2013. Diet of five species of the family Myctophidae caught off the Mariana Islands. Ichthyological Research 60: 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Venables, W. N. & B. D. Ripley, 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Young, J. W., S. J. M. Blaber & R. Rose, 1987. Reproductive biology of three species of midwater fishes associated with the continental slope of eastern Tasmania, Australia. Marine Biology 95: 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC)VigoSpain
  2. 2.Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations