The influence of anthropogenic shoreline changes on the littoral abundance of fish species in German lowland lakes varying in depth as determined by boosted regression trees
- 544 Downloads
Residential development on lake shores is regularly associated with the conversion of natural littoral habitats to riprap, sheet piles, beaches, parks, or marinas. The subsequent loss of littoral vegetation induces a decline of structural diversity and impacts littoral fish communities. These impacts may be shaped by lake morphology. Using boosted regression trees (BRT) to relate fish abundance data from 57 north-east German lowland lakes to various factors characterizing trophic state, lake morphology, and shoreline development, we investigated the response of 11 fish species to shoreline development. The analyses revealed that mean depth followed by trophic level and shoreline length (SL) contributed most in explaining littoral fish abundance. BRT models built for deep and shallow lakes separately confirmed that primarily trophic level and SL influenced fish abundance but that littoral vegetation was relatively more important in deep compared to shallow lakes, indicating that the effects of shoreline development may be more pronounced in deep lakes where the littoral makes up a smaller proportion of the lake area as compared to shallow lakes. The BRT further demonstrated species-specific responses to shoreline degradation, indicating that the reliability of ecological quality assessments of lakes can be improved by applying separate metrics for individual species.
KeywordsShoreline development Boosted regression tree Littoral fish Shallow lake Deep lake
The study was financed by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant no. 0330031) and by the German Ministry of Infrastructure and Agriculture of Brandenburg. We thank I. Borgmann, R. Frenzel, T. Rohde, A. Türck, and F. Weichler for their help during the sampling survey and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
- Argillier, C., S. Caussé, M. Gevrey, S. Pédron, J. De Bortoli, S. Brucet, M. Emmrich, E. Jeppesen, T. Lauridsen, T. Mehner, M. Olin, M. Rask, P. Volta, I. J. Winfield, F. Kelly, T. Krause, A. Palm & K. Holmgren, 2013. Development of a fish-based index to assess the eutrophication status of European lakes. Hydrobiologia 704(1): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bohlen, J., 2003. Untersuchungen zur Autökologie des Steinbeißers, Cobitis taenia. Dissertation, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
- Brämick, U., E. Fladung & P. Doering-Arjes, 2008. Aalmanagementplan – Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe. Institute of Inland Fisheries, Potsdam.Google Scholar
- De Nie, H. W., 1987. The decrease in aquatic vegetation in Europe and its consequences for fish populations. EIFAC/CECPI Occasional Paper 19. FAO, Rome: 1–52.Google Scholar
- Degerman, E., J. Hammar, P. Nyberg & G. Svärdson, 2001. Human impact on the fish diversity in the four largest lakes of Sweden. Ambio 8: 522–528.Google Scholar
- Eklöv, P., 1997. Effects of habitat complexity and prey abundance on the spatial and temporal distribution of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius L.). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1520–1531.Google Scholar
- Frid, A. & L. Dill, 2002. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conservation Ecology 6. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art11.
- Gasith, A., 1991. Can littoral resources influence ecosystem processes in large deep lakes? Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 1073–1076.Google Scholar
- Harmon, M. E., J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S. V. Gregory, J. D. Lattin, N. H. Anderson, S. P. Cline, N. G. Aumen, J. R. Sedell, G. W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack, Jr. & K. W. Cummins, 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133–302.Google Scholar
- Lauridsen, T. L. & I. Buenk, 1996. Diel changes in the horizontal distribution of zooplankton in the littoral zone of two shallow eutrophic lakes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 137: 167–176.Google Scholar
- Lawa, 1998. Gewässerbewertung – stehende Gewässer. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser, Kulturbuchverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Quantum GIS Development Team, 2011. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org.
- R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
- Randall, R. G., C. K. Minns, V. W. Cairns & J. E. Moore, 1996. The relationship between an index of fish production and submerged macrophytes and other habitat features at three littoral areas in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl. 1): 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ridgeway, G., 2004. Generalized Boosted Models: a guide to the gbm package.Google Scholar
- Wetzel, R. G., 1990. Land-water interfaces: metabolic and limnological regulators. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 6–24.Google Scholar