Hydrobiologia

, Volume 724, Issue 1, pp 267–277

Rapid estimation of potential yield for data-poor Tapes philippinarum fisheries in North Adriatic coastal lagoons

  • Simone Vincenzi
  • Giulio A. De Leo
  • Cristina Munari
  • Michele Mistri
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

We show how a simple species distribution model can be used for the rapid estimation of potential yield and for the identification of suitable sites for farming of Tapes philippinarum in two North Adriatic lagoons (Caleri and Marinetta-Vallona, Italy) in the face of limited data. We used a two-part species distribution model with sediment type, hydrodynamism, dissolved oxygen, and salinity as predictors of T. philippinarum potential yield. The first model component uses logistic regression to identify the areas in which clams occur, while the second component uses a weighted geometric mean of suitability values to estimate the potential annual yield (kg m−2 year−1) for the sites where T. philippinarum is predicted to be present. We used site-specific yield data from Caleri and Marinetta-Vallona to estimate the weights of the geometric mean by constrained linear regression. We validated the two-part model on an independent set of yield data (Radj2 = 0.82), and we then estimated the spatial distribution of potential yield in the two lagoons. The calibration and application of a simple species distribution model are useful tools for objectively identifying the most suitable sites for farming of T. philippinarum in North Adriatic lagoons.

Keywords

Data-poor system Aquaculture Two-part model Clam farming Species distribution model 

References

  1. Abbiati, M., M. Mistri, M. Bartoli, V. U. Ceccherelli, A. Colangelo, C. R. Ferrari, G. Giordani, C. Munari, M. Ponti, R. Rossi & P. Viaroli, 2010. Trade-off between conservation and exploitation of the transitional water ecosystems of the northern Adriatic. Chemistry and Ecology 26: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar-Manjarrez, J. & L. G. Ross, 1995. Geographical information system (GIS) environmental models for aquaculture development in Sinaloa state, Mexico. Aquaculture International 3: 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., J. M. Kapetsky, & D. Soto, 2010. The potential of spatial planning tools to support the ecosystem approach to aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. Akaike, H. A. I., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-19: 716–723.Google Scholar
  5. Bartoli, M., D. Nizzoli, P. Viaroli, E. Turolla, G. Castaldelli, E. A. Fano & R. Rossi, 2001. Impact of Tapes philippinarum farming on nutrient dynamics and benthic respiration in the Sacca di Goro. Hydrobiologia 455: 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brugère, C., & N. Ridler, 2004. Global aquaculture outlook in the next decades: an analysis of national aquaculture production forecasts to 2030. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1001 FIPP/C1001.Google Scholar
  8. Buckley, L. B., M. C. Urban, M. J. Angilletta, L. G. Crozier, L. J. Rissler & M. W. Sears, 2010. Can mechanism inform species’ distribution models? Ecology Letters 13: 1041–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, Y., W.-C. Lee, S. Hong, H.-C. Kim & J. B. Kim, 2012. GIS-based suitable site selection using habitat suitability index for oyster farms in Geoje-Hansan Bay, Korea. Ocean & Coastal Management 56: 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Alpaos, L., & A. Defina, 1995. Modellazione matematica del comportamento idrodinamico di zone a barena solcate da una rete di canali minori. Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. Defina, A., 2000. Two-dimensional shallow flow equations for partially dry areas. Water Resources Research 36: 3251–3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dormann, C. F., S. J. Schymanski, J. Cabral, I. Chuine, C. Graham, F. Hartig, M. Kearney, X. Morin, C. Römermann, B. Schröder & A. Singer, 2012. Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy. Journal of Biogeography 12: 2119–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elith, J. & C. H. Graham, 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? on finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elith, J. & J. R. Leathwick, 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ESAV, 1990. Tapes philippinarum: biologia e sperimentazione. Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  16. FAO, 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  17. Fielding, A. H. & J. F. Bell, 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folk, R. L., 1980. Petrology and Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  19. Guo, X., S. E. Ford & F. Zhang, 1999. Molluscan aquaculture in China. Journal of Shellfish Research 18: 19–31.Google Scholar
  20. Honey, K. T., J. H. Moxley, & R. M. Fujita, 2010. From rags to fishes: data-poor methods for fishery managers. In Managing Data-Poor Fisheries: Case Studies, Models & Solutions Conference. Berkeley, California: 159–184.Google Scholar
  21. Kapetsky, J. M., J. M. Hill & L. D. Worthy, 1988. A geographical information system for catfish farming development. Aquaculture 68: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marinov, D., J. M. Zaldívar, A. Norro, G. Giordani & P. Viaroli, 2008. Integrated modelling in coastal lagoons: Sacca di Goro case study. Hydrobiologia 611: 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melià, P., D. Nizzoli, M. Bartoli, M. Naldi, M. Gatto & P. Viaroli, 2003. Assessing the potential impact of clam rearing in dystrophic lagoons: an integrated oxygen balance. Chemistry and Ecology 19: 129–146.Google Scholar
  24. Munari, C. & M. Mistri, 2007. Effect of copper on the scope for growth of clams (Tapes philippinarum) from a farming area in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Marine Environmental Research 64: 347–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Munari, C., R. Rossi, E. Turolla & M. Mistri, 2009. Estimating clam recruitment potential in a nursery area in the Sacca di Goro lagoon (Italy). Italian Journal of Zoology 76: 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paesanti, F. & M. Pellizzato, 2000. Tapes philippinarum. Veneto Agricoltura, Legnaro: 73 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Pastres, R., C. Solidoro, G. Cossarini, D. Melaku Canu & C. Dejak, 2001. Managing the rearing of Tapes philippinarum in the lagoon of Venice: a decision support system. Ecological Modelling 138: 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pellizzato, M. & L. D. A. Ros, 2005. Clam farming quality as a management tool: a proposal based on recent studies in Northern Adriatic lagoons. Aquaculture International 13: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pranovi, F., F. Da Ponte, S. Raicevich & O. Giovanardi, 2004. A multidisciplinary study of the immediate effects of mechanical clam harvesting in the Venice Lagoon. ICES 61: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sbrenna, G. & D. Campioni, 1994. Gametogenic and spawning patterns of the Manila clams Tapes philippinarum (Bivalvia: Veneroida) in two lagoons of the river Po Delta, Italy. Journal of Shellfish Research 13: 37–46.Google Scholar
  31. Silva, C., J. G. Ferreira, S. B. Bricker, T. A. DelValls, M. L. Martín-Díaz & E. Yáñez, 2011. Site selection for shellfish aquaculture by means of GIS and farm-scale models, with an emphasis on data-poor environments. Aquaculture 318: 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Solidoro, C., D. Melaku Canu & R. Rossi, 2003. Ecological and economic considerations on fishing and rearing of Tapes philippinarum in the lagoon of Venice. Ecological Modelling 170: 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorokin, I. I., O. Giovanardi, F. Pranovi & P. I. Sorokin, 1999. Need for restricting bivalve culture in the southern basin of the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 400: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turolla, E., 2008. La venericoltura in Italia In Lovatelli, A., A. Farías, & I. Uriarte (eds), Estado actual del cultivo y manejo de moluscos bivalvos y su proyección futura: factores que afectan su sustentabilidad en América Latina. Taller Técnico Regional de la FAO, Rome: 177–188.Google Scholar
  35. Vincenzi, S., G. Caramori, R. Rossi & G. A. De Leo, 2006a. A GIS-based habitat suitability model for commercial yield estimation of Tapes philippinarum in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Sacca di Goro, Italy). Ecological Modelling 193: 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vincenzi, S., G. Caramori, R. Rossi & G. A. De Leo, 2006b. Estimating clam yield potential in the Sacca di Goro lagoon (Italy) by using a two-part conditional model. Aquaculture 261: 1281–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vincenzi, S., G. Caramori, R. Rossi & G. A. De Leo, 2007. A comparative analysis of three habitat suitability models for commercial yield estimation of Tapes philippinarum in a North Adriatic coastal lagoon (Sacca di Goro, Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin 55: 579–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vincenzi, S., M. Zucchetta, P. Franzoi, M. Pellizzato, F. Pranovi, G. A. De Leo & P. Torricelli, 2011. Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy. Ecological Modelling 222: 1471–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wenger, S. J. & J. D. Olden, 2012. Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Vincenzi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giulio A. De Leo
    • 3
  • Cristina Munari
    • 4
  • Michele Mistri
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Stock Assessment ResearchNational Marine Fisheries ServiceSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e BioingegneriaPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Hopkins Marine StationStanford UniversityPacific GroveUSA
  4. 4.Department of Life Sciences and BiotechnologiesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations