Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 714, Issue 1, pp 169–182 | Cite as

Influence of macroconsumers, stream position, and nutrient gradients on invertebrate assemblage development following flooding in intermittent prairie streams

  • Katie N. BertrandEmail author
  • Matt R. Whiles
  • Keith B. Gido
  • Justin N. Murdock
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Climate change in the US Great Plains is expected to result in less frequent but more severe floods. This will affect hydrologic cycles, stream organisms, and ultimately ecosystem structure and function. We examined factors influencing invertebrate assemblages following flooding in 3 reaches (20 pools) of Kings Creek, an intermittent prairie stream on the Konza Prairie Biological Station, using replicated macroconsumer enclosures (fishless, dace, shiners, ambient). Invertebrate densities and biomass increased rapidly following scouring, including rapid colonizing taxa and relatively long-lived taxa, but macroconsumers had no significant effects. Rather, distance, which was negatively correlated with the concentration of dissolved inorganic nitrogen, from the downstream confluence with a larger stream significantly influenced assemblage structure, with higher richness and greater nutrient concentrations closer to the confluence. Results support previous findings that recovery patterns following flooding in this grassland stream are strongly influenced by proximity to refuges. Furthermore, physical rather than biological factors appear more influential in structuring invertebrate assemblages in these frequently disturbed systems. Predicted increases in the intensity and duration of hydrologic disturbances will increase direct impacts on stream communities, relative to indirect effects through potential changes in macroconsumer communities. Human activities that alter refuges may further impede recovery following hydrologic disturbances.

Keywords

Disturbance Invertebrate Flood Prairie stream Macroconsumer Gradients 

Notes

Acknowledgments

M. Stone, S. Peterson, W. Dodds, J. Howe, J. Bengtson, J. Nemec, and A. Riley assisted in the field and laboratory. D. Whiting provided invertebrate data from Kings Creek that he collected during 2003–2004 previous to this study. Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation through the Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research Program (LTER) and Ecology Panel (DEB-0416126).

References

  1. Abjornsson, K., C. Bronmark & L. A. Hansson, 2002. The relative importance of lethal and non-lethal effects of fish on insect colonisation of ponds. Freshwater Biology 47: 1489–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acuna, V., I. Munoz, A. Giorgi, M. Omella, F. Sabater & S. Sabater, 2005. Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, K. R., 1951. The Horokiwi Stream: A Study of a Trout Population. NZ Dep Fish Bull 10.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. J., 2001. A new method of non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Australian Journal of Ecology 26: 32–46.Google Scholar
  5. Armitage, P. D., 1995. Faunal community change in response to flow manipulation. In Harper, D. M. & A. J. D. Ferguson (eds), The ecological basis for river management. Wiley, Chichester: 59–78.Google Scholar
  6. Bengtson, J. R., M. A. Evans-White & K. B. Gido, 2008. Effects of grazing minnows and crayfish on stream ecosystem structure and function. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 772–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benke, A. C., A. D. Huryn, L. A. Smock & J. B. Wallace, 1999. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. Journal of the North American Biological Society 18: 308–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertrand, K. N., K. B. Gido, W. K. Dodds, J. N. Murdock & M. R. Whiles, 2009. Disturbance frequency and functional identity mediate ecosystem processes in prairie streams. Oikos 118: 917–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulton, A. J., C. G. Peterson, N. B. Grimm & S. G. Fisher, 1992. Stability of an aquatic macroinvertebrate community in a multiyear hydrologic disturbance regime. Ecology 73: 2192–2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, S. D., S. J. Walde & B. L. Peckarsky, 1990. Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71: 1503–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creed Jr., R. P. & J. M. Reed, 2004. Ecosystem engineering by crayfish in a headwater stream community. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushing, D. H., 1990. Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: an update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. In Blaxter, J. H. S. & A. J. Southward (eds), Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 26. Academic Press: 249–293.Google Scholar
  13. Dodds, W. K. & R. M. Oakes, 2008. Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environmental Management 41: 367–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodds, W. K., K. Gido, M. R. Whiles, K. M. Fritz & W. J. Matthews, 2004. Life on the edge: the ecology of great plains prairie streams. BioScience 54: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Effenberger, M., J. Engel, S. Diehl & C. D. Matthaei, 2008. Disturbance history influences the distribution of stream invertebrates by altering microhabitat parameters: a field experiment. Freshwater Biology 53: 996–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Effenberger, M., S. Diehl, M. Gerth & C. D. Matthaei, 2011. Patchy bed disturbance and fish predation independently influence the distribution of stream invertebrates and algae. Journal of Animal Ecology 80: 603–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans-White, M. A. & W. K. Dodds, 2003. Ecosystem significance of crayfishes and stonerollers in a prairie stream: functional differences between co-occurring omnivores. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flecker, A. S., B. W. Taylor, E. S. Bernhardt, J. M. Hood, W. K. Cornwell, S. R. Cassatt, M. J. Vanni & N. S. Altman, 2002. Interactions between herbivorous fishes and limiting nutrients in a tropical stream ecosystem. Ecology 83: 1831–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franssen, N. R., K. B. Gido, C. S. Guy, J. A. Tripe, S. J. Shrank, T. R. Strakosh, K. N. Bertrand, C. M. Franssen, K. L. Pitts & C. P. Paukert, 2006. Effects of floods on fish assemblages in an intermittent prairie stream. Freshwater Biology 51: 2072–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz, K. M. & W. K. Dodds, 2004. Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrate assemblages to drying and flood in a tallgrass prairie stream system. Hydrobiologia 527: 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilliam, J. F., D. F. Fraser & A. M. Sabat, 1989. Strong effects of foraging minnows on a stream benthic invertebrate community. Ecology 70: 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray, L. J., W. K. Dodds, A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett & S. L. Collins, 1998a. Structure and Dynamics of Aquatic Communities. In Anonymous (ed) Grassland Dyanamics: Long-term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie. Oxford University Press, New York: 177–189.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, L. J., G. L. Macpherson, J. K. Koelliker, W. K. Dodds, A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett & S. L. Collins, 1998b. Hydrology and Aquatic Chemistry. In Anonymous (ed) Grassland Dynamics: Long-term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, 159–176.Google Scholar
  24. Hax, C. L. & S. W. Golladay, 1998. Flow disturbance of macroinvertebrates inhabiting sediments and woody debris in a prairie stream. American Midland Naturalist 139: 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herrmann, P. B., C. R. Townsend & C. D. Matthaei, 2012. Individual and combined effects of fish predation and bed disturbance on stream benthic communities: a streamside channel experiment. Freshwater Biology 57(12): 2487–2503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennen, J. G., K. Riva-Murray & K. M. Beaulieu, 2010. Determining hydrologic factors that influence stream macroinvertebrate assemblages in the northeastern US. Ecohydrology 3: 88–106.Google Scholar
  27. Knapp, A. K., P. A. Fay, J. M. Blair, S. L. Collins, M. D. Smith, J. D. Carlisle, C. W. Harper, B. T. Danner, M. S. Lett & J. K. McCarron, 2002. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298: 2202–2205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lake, P. S. P. M. A., P. Biro, J. J. Cole, A. P. Covich, C. N. Dahm, J. Gilbert, W. Goedkoop, K. Martens & J. Verhoeven, 2000. Global change and the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystems: impacts on linkages between above-sediment and sediment biota. BioScience 50: 1099–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larned, S. T., T. Datry, D. B. Arscott & K. Tockner, 2010. Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshwater Biology 55: 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lytle, D. A. & N. L. Poff, 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mackay, R. J., 1992. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates – a review of processes and patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 617–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marchant, R., 1999. How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? A comment on the conclusions of Cao et al. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1840–1841.Google Scholar
  33. Matthaei, C. D., U. Uehlinger, E. I. Meyer & A. Frutiger, 1996. Recolonization by benthic invertebrates after experimental disturbance in a Swiss prealpine river. Freshwater Biology 35: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maude, S. H. & D. D. Williams, 1983. Behavior of crayfish in water currents: hydrodynamics of eight species with reference to their distribution patterns in Southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMullen, L. E. & D. A. Lytle, 2012. Quantifying invertebrate resistance to floods: a global-scale meta-analysis. Ecological Applications 22: 2164–2175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1996. An introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
  37. Mesa, L. M., 2010. Effect of spates and land use on macroinvertebrate community in Neotropical Andean streams. Hydrobiologia 641: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murdock, J. N., K. B. Gido, W. K. Dodds, K. N. Bertrand & M. R. Whiles, 2010. Consumer return chronology alters recovery trajectory of stream ecosystem structure and function following drought. Ecology 91: 1048–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peckarsky, B. L., A. R. McIntosh, B. W. Taylor & J. Dahl, 2002. Predator chemicals induce changes in mayfly life history traits: whole stream manipulation. Ecology 83: 612–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Power, M. E., 1990. Effects of fish in river food webs. Science 250: 811–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Power, M. E., M. S. Parker & W. E. Dietrich, 2008. Seasonal reassembly of a river food web: floods, droughts, and impacts of fish. Ecological Monographs 78: 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ranvestel, A. W., K. R. Lips, C. M. Pringle, M. R. Whiles & R. J. Bixby, 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshwater Biology 49: 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reice, S. R. & R. L. Edwards, 1986. The effect of vertebrate predation on lotic macroinvertebrate communities in Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 1930–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, C. T., S. Blaser, C. Jolidon & L. N. S. Shama, 2011. Scales of patchiness in the response of lotic macroinvertebrates to disturbance in a regulated river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rocha, L. G., E. S. F. Medeiros & H. T. A. Andrade, 2012. Influence of flow variability on macroinvertebrate assemblages in an intermittent stream of semi-arid Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 85: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenfeld, J. S., 2000. Effects of fish predation in erosional and depositional habitats in a temperate stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 1369–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruetz III, C. R., B. Vondracek & R. M. Newman, 2004. Weak top-down control of grazers and periphyton by slimy sculpins in a coldwater stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sartory, D. P. & J. E. Grobbelaar, 1984. Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia 114: 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, D. G., 2001. Pennak’s freshwater invertebrates of the United States, Porifera to Crustacea, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor & H. L. Miller, 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: 996.Google Scholar
  51. Stagliano, D. M. & M. R. Whiles, 2002. Macroinvertebrate production and trophic structure in a tallgrass prairie stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stanley, E. H., D. L. Buschman, A. J. Boulton, N. B. Grimm & S. G. Fisher, 1994. Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. American Midland Naturalist 131: 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stanley, E. H., S. M. Powers & N. R. Lottig, 2010. The evolving legacy of disturbance in stream ecology: concepts, contributions, and coming challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stubbington, R., 2012. The hyporheic zone as an invertebrate refuge: a review of variability in space, time, taxa and behaviour. Marine and Freshwater Research 63: 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swanson, F. J., S. L. Johnson, S. V. Gregory & S. A. Acker, 1998. Flood disturbance in a forested mountain landscape. BioScience 48: 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thorp, J. H., M. C. Thoms & M. D. Delong, 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Research and Applications 22: 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vannote, R. R., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wallace, J. B., 1990. Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance. Environmental Management 14: 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wallace, J. B. & J. R. Webster, 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Reviews 41: 115–139.Google Scholar
  60. Welschmeyer, N. A., 1995. Flourometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and phaeopigments. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 1985–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whiting, D. P., 2009. Macroinvertebrate production, trophic structure, and energy flow along a tallgrass prairie stream continuum. Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  62. Whiting, D. P., M. R. Whiles & M. L. Stone, 2011. Patterns of macroinvertebrate production, trophic structure, and energy flow along a tallgrass prairie stream continuum. Limnology and Oceanography 56: 887–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie N. Bertrand
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matt R. Whiles
    • 2
  • Keith B. Gido
    • 3
  • Justin N. Murdock
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Zoology and Center for EcologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyTennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations