The São Paulo shelf (SE Brazil) as a nursery ground for Doryteuthis plei (Blainville, 1823) (Cephalopoda, Loliginidae) paralarvae: a Lagrangian particle-tracking Individual-Based Model approach
- 358 Downloads
The São Paulo shelf ranges from ~23°S to 25°S, comprising nearly 622 km of shoreline. This region sustains historical landings of the tropical arrow squid Doryteuthis plei. As in other coleoid cephalopods, the broodstock dies following spawning and the continuance of the population relies exclusively upon the survival of the paralarvae, which are very sensitive to oceanographic conditions. As a first step towards the understanding of paralarval transport, the shelf area was evaluated in terms of retention/dispersion potential. A Lagrangian particle-tracking Individual-Based Model was set up using a 3D Princeton Ocean Model model forced with in situ data obtained from July 2009 to July 2011. Neutrally buoyant particles were released every first day of every month in the model, and tracked for 30 days. The retention potential was high for particles released from the bottom all over the study area from the coast to the shelf break (200 m isobath). Offshore losses showed a marked seasonality. Regarding inshore losses, the percentage of particles beached was constant year round and smaller than offshore losses, being higher south of 24°S. Simulation results seem to agree with present knowledge of the reproductive behaviour of the species in the region.
KeywordsLarval dispersal Squid Hydrodynamics Modelling SW Atlantic Retention
This study is one of the results of the “The squid (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) as a fishery resource on the northern coast of São Paulo: population dynamics, fisheries oceanography, and the human dimension” project funded by the FAPESP/BIOTA Program (2010/50183-6). RSM is supported by a FAPESP post-doc fellowship (2010/15978-8). We extend our gratitude to the University of São Paulo Extension Dean (PRCEX-USP 12.1.895.21.4) and FAPESP (2012/14140-6) for the financial support provided to attend the CIAC’2012 (Cephalopod International Advisory Council Symposium) in Florianópolis, where this study was presented. The help provided by Christophe Lett and Philipe Verley (Institut de recherche pour le développement—IRD, France) in the early stages of this study is fully and gratefully appreciated. Special thanks to Tito Conte (Oceanographic Institute, University of São Paulo) for his assistance with the R scripts. MAG acknowledges the CNPq (Brazilian Research Council) for the productivity grant (309732/2011-5).
- Araújo, C. C., 2013. Oceanografia pesqueira dos estágios iniciais de Loliginidae (Cephalopoda: Myopsida): paralarvas ao longo da plataforma continental entre Cabo de São Tomé (RJ) e Cananéia (SP) (22°–25°S). MSc Dissertation, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo: 140 pp.Google Scholar
- Araújo, C. C., M. Katsuragawa & M. A. Gasalla, 2011. Cephalopod paralarvae off the Southeastern Brazilian Bight (22°–25°S), Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. In: 3rd Annual Larval Fish Conference (Session Cephalopod Early-life History), 3, 2011. Wilmington, North Carolina. Book of Abstracts. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. Digital resource at http://www.larvalfishcon.org/Conf_Abstracts.asp?ConferenceCode=35th&AbstractID=1292.
- Bakun, A., 1996. Patterns in the ocean: ocean processes and marine population dynamics. California Sea Grant College System, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration in cooperation with Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste.Google Scholar
- Bakun, A. & R. H. Parrish, 1991. Comparative studies of coastal pelagic fish reproductive habitats: the anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) of the southwestern Atlantic. Journal du Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 48: 342–361.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. A. S. & M. Haimovici, 1990. A pesca de polvos e lulas no litoral do Rio de Janeiro. Ciência e Cultura 42: 1124–1130.Google Scholar
- Gasalla, M. A., 2004. Women on the water? The participation of women in seagoing fishing off southeastern Brazil. ACP EU Fisheries Research Report Number, Vol. 16.Google Scholar
- Gasalla, M. A., A. R. Rodrigues & F. A. Postuma, 2010. The trophic role of the squid Loligo plei as a keystone species in the South Brazil Bight ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 1413–1424.Google Scholar
- Gasalla, M. A., A. Migotto & R. S. Martins, 2011. First occurrence of Doryteuthis plei (Blainville, 1823) egg capsules off São Sebastião, Southeastern Brazil, and characteristics of embryos and newly-hatched paralarvae. In International Symposium Coleoid Cephalopod Through Time, Vol. 4, 2011. Stuttgart, Germany. Staaliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Stuttgart: 29–31.Google Scholar
- Hare, J. A., J. A. Quinlan, F. E. Werner, B. O. Blanton, J. J. Govoni, R. B. Forward Jr, L. R. Settle & D. E. Hoss, 1999. Larval transport during winter in the SABRE study area: results of a coupled vertical larval behaviour—three-dimensional circulation model. Fisheries Oceanography 8: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Juanicó-Rivero, M., 1979. Contribuição ao estudo da biologia dos Cephalopoda Loliginidae no Atlântico Sul Ocidental, entre Rio de Janeiro e Mar de Plata. PhD thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Kitagawa, T., Y. Kato, M. J. Miller, Y. Sasai, H. Sasaki & S. Kimura, 2010. The restricted spawning area and season of Pacific bluefin tuna facilitate use of nursery areas: a modeling approach to larval and juvenile dispersal processes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 393: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martins, R. S., 2009. Some factors influencing the transport of chokka squid (Loligo reynaudii d’Orbigny, 1839) paralarvae off the Eastern Cape, South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
- Martins, R. S. & J. A. A. Perez, 2006. Occurrence of loliginid paralarvae around Santa Catarina Island, southern Brazil. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 1: 24–27.Google Scholar
- Martins, R. S. & J. A. A. Perez, 2007. The ecology of loliginid squid in shallow-waters around Santa Catarina Island, southern Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 80: 125–146.Google Scholar
- Martins, R. S., J. A. A. Perez & C. A. F. Schettini, 2006. The squid Loligo plei around Santa Catarina Island, southern Brazil: ecology and interactions with the coastal oceanographic environment. Journal of Coastal Research SI 39: 1284–1289.Google Scholar
- Martins, R. S., M. J. Roberts, N. Chang, P. Verley, C. L. Moloney & E. A. G. Vidal, 2010a. Effect of yolk utilization on the specific gravity of chokka squid (Loligo reynaudii) paralarvae: implications for dispersal on the Agulhas Bank, South Africa. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 331–344.Google Scholar
- Matsuura, Y., 1986. Contribuição ao estudo da estrutura oceanográfica da região sudeste entre Cabo Frio (RJ) e Cabo de Santa Marta Grande (SC). Ciência e Cultura 38: 1439–1450.Google Scholar
- Mazzini, P. L. F., 2009. Correntes subinerciais na plataforma continental interna entre Peruíbe e São Sebastião: observações. MSc dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo: 110 pp.Google Scholar
- Mellor, G. L., 1998. Three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model. User’s Guide. Princeton University, Internal Report.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. C. M., C. L. Moloney, C. van der Lingen, C. Lett, C. Mullon & J. G. Field, 2006. Modelling the effects of physical–biological interactions and spatial variability in spawning and nursery areas on transport and retention of sardine Sardinops sagax eggs and larvae in the southern Benguela ecosystem. Journal of Marine Systems 61: 212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NOAA, 2012. Historical El Nino/La Nina episodes (1950–present). http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml. Assessed 12 November 2012.
- North, E. W., Z. Schlag, R. R. Hood, M. Li, L. Zhong, T. Gross & V. S. Kennedy, 2008. Vertical swimming behavior influences the dispersal of simulated oyster larvae in a coupled particle-tracking and hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 359: 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perez, J. A. A., 2002. Biomass dynamics of the squid Loligo plei and the development of a small-scale seasonal fishery off southern Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 71: 633–651.Google Scholar
- Postuma, F. A. & M. A. Gasalla, 2010. On the relationship between squid and the environment: artisanal jigging for Loligo plei at São Sebastião Island (24°S), southeastern Brazil. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 1353–1362.Google Scholar
- Sauer, W. H. H., M. J. Smale & M. R. Lipiński, 1992. The location of spawning grounds, spawning and schooling behaviour of the squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii (Cephalopoda: Myopsida) off the Eastern Cape Coast, South Africa. Marine Biology 114: 97–107.Google Scholar
- Tanaka, K., R. S. Martins & M. A. Gasalla, 2011. Evaluation of statoliths for aging juvenile squid (Doryteuthis plei, Blainville, 1823): preliminary results. 19° Simpósio de Iniciação Científica da USP (SIICUSP). https://uspdigital.usp.br/siicusp/cdOnlineTrabalhoVisualizarResumo?numeroInscricaoTrabalho=3069&numeroEdicao=19. Assessed 28 February 2013.
- Vidal, E. A. G., F. P. DiMarco, J. H. Wormuth & P. G. Lee, 2002. Influence of temperature and food availability on survival, growth and yolk utilization in hatchling squid. Bulletin of Marine Science 71: 915–931.Google Scholar
- Vidal, E. A. G., L. D. Zeidberg & E. J. Buskey, 2009. Swimming behavior in fed and starved squid paralarvae. Cephalopod International Advisory Council Symposium 2009 (CIAC’09) Abstracts p. 61.Google Scholar
- Yang, W. T., R. F. Hixon, P. E. Turk, M. E. Krejci, W. H. Hulet & R. T. Hanlon, 1986. Growth, behavior, and sexual reproduction of the market squid, Loligo opalescens, cultured through the life cycle. Fishery Bulletin 84: 771–798.Google Scholar
- Young, R. E. & R. F. Harman, 1988. “Larva”, “paralarva” and “subadult” in cephalopod terminology. Malacologia 29: 201–207.Google Scholar
- Zeidberg, L. D., W. M. Hamner, N. P. Nezlin & A. Henry, 2006. The fishery of the California market squid, Loligo opalescens (Cephalopoda, Myopsida), from 1981–2003. Fishery Bulletin 104: 46–59.Google Scholar