Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 715, Issue 1, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Two threats at once: encounters with predator cues alter host life-history and morphological responses to parasite spores

  • Wolfgang Engelbrecht
  • Olivia Hesse
  • Justyna Wolinska
  • Christian Laforsch
CLADOCERA

Abstract

Parasites and predators are ubiquitous threats in every ecosystem. Host and prey species, respectively, have evolved effective protective mechanisms which are assumed to involve costs. In this study, we analyzed potential interactions between both threats. We exposed waterfleas (Daphnia longicephala) simultaneously to parasite spores (the yeast Metschnikowia) and cues from predatory notonectids (Notonecta glauca). In response to the parasite, D. longicephala had a delayed maturation time and produced less and smaller offspring, even though the parasite developed no spores. This suggests that hosts can successfully fight off the parasite invoking defensive costs. Some of these effects were altered or even reversed by the presence of predator cues. For example, time to maturity was further delayed when the Daphnia were exposed to both threats than under parasite stress alone. In addition, more offspring were produced in the presence of both threats, although parasites alone reduced their number. However, there was no effect of parasite exposure on the expression of morphological defenses. Our results imply that the impact of parasites on host species depends strongly on the presence of further threats. Similar types of experimental approaches may enhance our understanding of the effects of multiple stressors in natural systems.

Keywords

Daphnia Metschnikowia Host–parasite Predator–prey Multiple stressors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Kredler and E. Ossipova for help during the experiments and the members of the Laforsch group for comments on the manuscript. This research was funded by a DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) grant to CL and JW (LA 2159/5-1). OH was funded by a research scholarship provided by the Universität Bayern e.V.

Supplementary material

10750_2012_1396_MOESM1_ESM.doc (698 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 699 kb)

References

  1. Balasubramanian, M. K., E. Bi & M. Glotzer, 2004. Comparative analysis of cytokinesis in budding yeast, fission yeast and animal cells. Current Biology 14: R806–R818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, M. J., 1994. The costs of crest induction for Daphnia carinata. Oecologia 97: 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, M. J., 1995. The role of nutrition in regulation of predator-induced crests of Daphnia carinata. Freshwater Biology 34: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, M. J., 1998. Endosulfan-enhanced crest induction in Daphnia longicephala: evidence for cholinergic innervation of kairomone receptors. Journal of Plankton Research 20: 1219–1231.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, M. J., 2000. Inducible defences in Daphnia: responses to two closely related predator species. Oecologia 124: 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry, M. J. & I. A. E. Bayly, 1985. Further studies on predator induction of crests in Australian Daphnia and the effects of crests on predation. Marine and Freshwater Research 36: 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carton, Y., A. J. Nappi & M. Poirie, 2005. Genetics of anti-parasite resistance in invertebrates. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 29: 9–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coors, A. & L. De Meester, 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple stressors: predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 1820–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Meester, L., 1993. Genotype, fish-mediated chemical, and phototactic behavior in Daphnia magna. Ecology 74: 1467–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dudycha, J. L., 2001. The senescence of Daphnia from risky and safe habitats. Ecology Letters 4: 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebert, D., 2005. Ecology, Epidemiology, and Evolution of Parasitism in Daphnia. National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Ebert, D., M. Lipsitch & K. L. Mangin, 2000a. The effect of parasites on host population density and extinction: experimental epidemiology with Daphnia and six microparasites. American Naturalist 156: 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebert, D., C. D. Zschokke-Rohringer & H. J. Carius, 2000b. Dose effects and density-dependent regulation of two microparasites of Daphnia magna. Oecologia 122: 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fels, D., V. A. Lee & D. Ebert, 2004. The impact of microparasites on the vertical distribution of Daphnia magna. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 161: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, J. W. G. & I. A. E. Bayly, 1981. Predator induction of crests in morphs of the Daphnia carinata King complex. Limnology and Oceanography 26: 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, S. R., M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier & C. E. Cáceres, 2005. Spatial heterogeneity of daphniid parasitism within lakes. Oecologia 143: 635–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, S. R., A. J. Tessier, M. A. Duffy, M. Huebner & C. E. Cáceres, 2006. Warmer does not have to mean sicker: temperature and predators can jointly drive timing of epidemics. Ecology 87: 1684–1695.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, S. R., C. J. Knight, C. R. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier & C. E. Cáceres, 2009. Quality matters: resource quality for hosts and the timing of epidemics. Ecology Letters 12: 118–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harter, H. L., 1961. Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika 48: 151–165.Google Scholar
  20. Hesse, O., W. Engelbrecht, C. Laforsch & J. Wolinska, 2012. Fighting parasites and predators: how to deal with multiple threats? BMC Ecology 12: 12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudson, P. J., 1998. Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science 282: 2256–2258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joop, G. & J. Rolff, 2004. Plasticity of immune function and condition under the risk of predation and parasitism. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 1051–1062.Google Scholar
  23. Kohler, S. L. & M. J. Wiley, 1992. Parasite-induced collapse of populations of a dominant grazer in Michigan streams. Oikos 65: 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laforsch, C., W. Ngwa, W. Grill & R. Tollrian, 2004. An acoustic microscopy technique reveals hidden morphological defenses in Daphnia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 15911–15914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laforsch, C., L. Beccara & R. Tollrian, 2006. Inducible defenses: the relevance of chemical alarm cues in Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 1466–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Little, T. J., B. O’Connor, N. Colegrave, K. Watt & A. F. Read, 2003. Maternal transfer of strain-specific immunity in an invertebrate. Current Biology 13: 489–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lohr, J. N., M. Yin & J. Wolinska, 2010. Prior residency does not always pay off—co-infections in Daphnia. Parasitology 137: 1493–1500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Metschnikoff, E., 1884. A disease of Daphnia caused by a yeast. A contribution to the theory of phagocytes as agents for attack on disease-causing organisms. In Brock, T. (ed.), Milestones in Microbiology. Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs: 132–138.Google Scholar
  29. Morrison, W. I., M. Murray, P. D. Sayer & J. M. Preston, 1981. The pathogenesis of experimentally induced Trypanosoma brucei infection in the dog. American Journal of Pathology 130: 168–181.Google Scholar
  30. Rabus, M., A. Waterkeyn, N. van Pottelbergh, L. Brendonck & C. Laforsch, 2012. Interclonal variation, effectiveness and long-term implications of Triops-induced morphological defences in Daphnia magna Strauss. Journal of Plankton Research 34: 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmid-Hempel, P., 2011. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology, Ecology, and Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Söderhäll, K. & L. Cerenius, 1998. Role of the prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrate immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology 10: 23–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spitze, K. & T. D. Sadler, 1996. Evolution of a generalist genotype: multivariate analysis of the adaptiveness of phenotypic plasticity. American Naturalist 148: 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stirnadel, H. A. & D. Ebert, 1997. Prevalence, host specificity and impact on host fecundity of microparasites and epibionts in three sympatric Daphnia species. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 212–222.Google Scholar
  35. Tollrian, R. & C. D. Harvell, 1999. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  36. Wolinska, J., S. Giessler & H. Koerner, 2009. Molecular identification and hidden diversity of novel Daphnia parasites from European lakes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 7051–7059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolinska, J., J. Seda, H. Koerner, P. Smilauer & A. Petrusek, 2011. Spatial variation of Daphnia parasite load within individual water bodies. Journal of Plankton Research 33: 1284–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yin, M., C. Laforsch, J. N. Lohr & J. Wolinska, 2011. Predator-induced defense makes Daphnia more vulnerable to parasites. Evolution 65: 1482–1488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Engelbrecht
    • 1
  • Olivia Hesse
    • 1
  • Justyna Wolinska
    • 1
  • Christian Laforsch
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology IILudwig-Maximilians-University MunichPlanegg-MartinsriedGermany
  2. 2.GeoBio CenterLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Animal Ecology IUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations