Species distribution and assembly patterns of frog larvae in rainforest streams of Madagascar
- 855 Downloads
Many tropical rainforests harbour species-rich assemblages of frogs and, consequently, of tadpoles. These larvae are often morphologically highly diverse, especially in their oral structures. Whether this might represent an important axis of ecological partitioning in frog assemblages remains an untested hypothesis. In general, it is poorly known how diverse tadpole assemblages are organised. Using information from Madagascar’s remarkably species-rich stream tadpole assemblages, we analysed the distribution and co-occurrence of 44 species. We also assessed the importance of phylogenetic history and eco-morphological adaptation for habitat selection at two functional and two spatial levels. We show that both rare and common species exist in most morphological clusters and phylogenetic groups of tadpoles. Habitat characteristics of the streams and surrounding forest influence species composition. Whereas there is a general trend in preferring wide and deep streams without a steep slope for most species, some of the morphological clusters separate along specific habitat variables. Stream choice is influenced both by phylogenetic history and morphological adaptation. Within streams, tadpoles partition microhabitat mainly according to their morphological cluster but without phylogenetic signal. Species dissimilarities of habitat selection on both spatial scales are not correlated. We found no evidence for competition in the tadpole assemblages studied.
KeywordsRanomafana National Park Tadpole Morphological cluster Species–habitat association Habitat choice Community Anura
We are grateful to S. Ndriantsoa, E. Rajeriarison, T. Rajoafiarison, H. Rasolonjatovo, D. Razafindrabe, E. Reeve, and J. Solo for their contribution to fieldwork. Logistic support was provided by ValBio, MICET/ICTE, and Madagascar National Parks. Molecular identification of tadpoles was carried out with help in the lab by G. Keunecke, S. Janssen, M. Kondermann, and E. Saxinger. This study was carried out in the framework of a cooperation accord between the Département de Biologie Animale of the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar and the Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany. The Malagasy authorities kindly issued research and export permits. Financial support was granted by the Volkswagen Foundation to MV and RDR, by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant VE247/2-1) to MV, AS, and JG, and by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst to RDR.
- Alford, R. A., 1999. Ecology: resource use, competition, and predation. In McDiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig (eds), Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. Chicago University Press, Chicago: 240–278.Google Scholar
- Altig, R. & R. W. McDiarmid, 1999. Body plan: development and morphology. In McDiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig (eds), Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 24–51.Google Scholar
- Andreone, F., G. M. Rosa, J. Noël, A. Crottini, M. Vences & C. J. Raxworthy, 2010. Living within fallen palm leaves: the discovery of an unknown Blommersia (Mantellidae: Anura) reveals a new reproductive strategy in the amphibians of Madagascar. Naturwissenschaften 97: 525–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates, D. & M. Maechler, 2010. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-34 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/].
- Box, G. E. P. & D. R. Cox, 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 26: 211–252.Google Scholar
- Burnham, K. P. & D. R. Anderson, 2002. Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- Cadle, J. E. & H. W. Greene, 1993. Phylogenetic patterns, biogeography, and the ecological structure of neotropical snake assemblages. In Ricklefs, R. E. & D. Schluter (eds), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 281–293.Google Scholar
- Diamond, J. M., 1975. Assembly of species communities. In Cody, M. L. & J. M. Diamond (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge: 342–444.Google Scholar
- Duellman, W. E., 1978. The Biology of an Equatorial Herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador, Vol. 65. Miscellaneous publication, University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Lawrence.Google Scholar
- Ernst, R. & M.-O. Rödel, 2006. Community assembly and structure of tropical leaf-litter anurans. Ecotropica 12: 113–129.Google Scholar
- Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. car: companion to applied regression. R package version 2.0-10 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car].
- Glaw, F. & M. Vences, 2007. A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar. Vences & Glaw Verlag, Cologne.Google Scholar
- Glaw, F., J. Köhler, I. de la Riva, D. R. Vieites & M. Vences, 2010. Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis. Zootaxa 2383: 1–82.Google Scholar
- Glos, J., M. Teschke & M. Vences, 2007. Aquatic zebras? The tadpoles of the Madagascan treefrog Boophis schuboeae Glaw & Vences 2002 compared to those of B. ankaratra Andreone 1993. Tropical Zoology 20: 125–133.Google Scholar
- Grosjean, S., R.-D. Randrianiaina, A. Strauß & M. Vences, 2011a. Sand-eating tadpoles in Madagascar: morphology and ecology of the unique larvae of the treefrog Boophis picturatus. Salamandra 47: 63–76.Google Scholar
- Henning, C. & B. Hausdorf, 2010. prabclus: functions for clustering of presence–absence and abundance data. R package version 2.2-2 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/prabclus].
- Hero, J. M., W. E. Magnusson, C. F. D. Rocha & C. P. Catterall, 2001. Antipredator defenses influence the distribution of amphibian prey species in the central Amazon rain forest. Biotropica 33: 131–141.Google Scholar
- Hubbell, S. P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Ivlev, V. S., 1961. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendre, B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2009. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.15-4 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan].
- Parmelee, J. R., 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran assemblage. Scientific Papers, Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas 11: 1–59.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team, 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna [available on internet at http://www.R-project.org].
- Randrianiaina, R.-D., R. N. Antúnez, J. Canitz, F. Forth, I. Lemme, B. Rodríguez, H. Rinas, R. Thänert, P. Tröger, N. Westphal, A. Willim, K. C. Wollenberg, A. Strauß & M. Vences, 2009a. Vogue or adaptive character? A tadpole’s goatee helps to distinguish two cryptic treefrog species of the genus Boophis. Herpetology Notes 2: 165–173.Google Scholar
- Randrianiaina, R.-D., L. Raharivololoniaina, C. Preuss, A. Strauß, F. Glaw, M. Teschke, J. Glos, N. Raminosoa & M. Vences, 2009b. Descriptions of the tadpoles of seven species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis. Zootaxa 2021: 23–41.Google Scholar
- Randrianiaina, R.-D., A. Strauß, J. Glos, F. Glaw & M. Vences, 2011a. Diversity, external morphology and reverse taxonomy in the specialized tadpoles of Malagasy river bank frogs of the subgenus Ochthomantis (genus Mantidactylus). Contributions to Zoology 80: 17–65.Google Scholar
- Sarkar, D., 2008. lattice: lattice graphics. R package version 0.17-17 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lattice].
- Tilman, D., 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Vejarano, S., M. Thomas & M. Vences, 2006. Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Guibemantis (Amphibia: Mantellidae). Zootaxa 1329: 39–57.Google Scholar
- Venables, W. & B. Ripley, 2010. MASS library (R package version 7.3-5 [available on internet at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS].
- Vences, M., F. Glaw & W. Böhme, 1998. Evolutionary correlates of microphagy in alkaloid-containing frogs (Amphibia: Anura). Zoologischer Anzeiger 236: 217–230.Google Scholar
- Vences, M., Y. Chiari, M. Teschke, R.-D. Randrianiaina, L. Raharivololoniaina, P. Bora, D. R. Vieites & F. Glaw, 2008. Which frogs are out there? A preliminary evaluation of survey techniques and identification reliability of Malagasy amphibians. In Andreone, F. (ed.), A Conservation Strategy for the Amphibians of Madagascar—Monografie XLV. Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino: 233–252.Google Scholar
- Vences, M., F. Glaw, J. Köhler & K. C. Wollenberg, 2010. Molecular phylogeny, morphology and bioacoustics reveal five additional species of arboreal microhylids of the genus Anodonthyla from Madagascar. Contributions to Zoology 79: 1–32.Google Scholar
- Vieites, D. R., K. C. Wollenberg, F. Andreone, J. Köhler, F. Glaw & M. Vences, 2009. Vast underestimation of Madagascar’s biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 8267–8272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wells, K. D., 2007. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno-Graham & G. M. Smith, 2007. Analysing Ecological Data. Springer, New York.Google Scholar