Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 719, Issue 1, pp 451–482 | Cite as

Water management in mediterranean river basins: a comparison of management frameworks, physical impacts, and ecological responses

  • Theodore E. GranthamEmail author
  • Ricardo Figueroa
  • Narcís Prat
MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE STREAMS Review Paper

Abstract

Rivers in mediterranean climates have been extensively modified by water management infrastructure and practices, yet patterns of development and consequent effects on freshwater ecosystems have not been compared across multiple regions. To evaluate the influence of water management on mediterranean-climate rivers, we compare the historic progression of management policies, institutions, and ecosystem impacts in the Sacramento River (California, USA), Ebro River (Spain), and Biobío River (Chile) basins. There are broad similarities in patterns of ecosystem alterations related to the extensive development of dams and water management infrastructure in the three study basins. Flow regimes have been altered by the reduction of winter peak flows and increased summer baseflows. There are also common patterns of disturbance from sediment transport alteration, water quality degradation, and declines in freshwater biodiversity. Current approaches are inadequate for addressing the formidable water management challenges in California, Spain, and Chile, yet the dramatic evolution of water policies and institutions over the past 150 years suggests that further adaptation is possible. Advances toward integrated and sustainable water management models are likely to occur through incremental change, driven by growing awareness of climate change effects and public demands for water-use efficiency and improved environmental quality.

Keywords

Integrated water resources management Water policy River ecosystems California Chile Spain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank V. Resh and N. Bonada for inviting us to contribute to this special issue. A. Merenlender and P. Moyle and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. T.G. was supported by a U.S. Scholar Fulbright Grant.

References

  1. Albiac, J., J. Uche, A. Valero, L. Serra, A. Meyer & J. Tapia, 2003. The economic unsustainability of the Spanish National Hydrologic Plan. International Journal of Water Resources Development 19(3): 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcaraz, C., N. Caiola & C. Ibañez, 2011. Bioaccumulation of pollutants in the zebra mussel from hazardous industrial waste and evaluation of spatial distribution using GAMs. Science of the Total Environment 409(5): 898–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alpers, C. N., R. C. Antweiler, H. E. Taylor, P. D. Dileanis & J. L. Domagalski, 2000. Metals Transport in the Sacramento River, California, 1996–1997, Volume 2: Interpretation of Metal Loads. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4002.Google Scholar
  4. Aparicio, E., M. J. Vargas, J. M. Olmo & A. de Sostoa, 2000. Decline of native freshwater fishes in a Mediterranean watershed on the Iberian Peninsula: a quantitative assessment. Environmental Biology of Fishes 59(1): 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araus, J. L., 2004. The problems of sustainable water use in the Mediterranean and research requirements for agriculture. Annals of Applied Biology 144(3): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, T. P., D. W. Pierce, H. G. Hidalgo, C. Bonfils, B. D. Santer, T. Das, G. Bala, A. W. Wood, T. Nozawa, A. A. Mirin, D. R. Cayan & M. D. Dettinger, 2008. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the Western United States. Science 319(5866): 1080–1083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basualto, M., A. Acuña, O. Parra, G. Azócar & R. Figueroa, 2009. Aspectos de la Gestión del agua en Chile. In Jacobi, P. R. & P. Sinisgalli (eds), Gobernanza del Agua y de las Políticas Públicas en Latinoamérica y Europa. Annablume, São Paulo: 79–99.Google Scholar
  8. Batalla, R. J. & D. Vericat, 2009. Hydrological and sediment transport dynamics of flushing flows: implications for management in large Mediterranean rivers. River Research and Applications 25(3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batalla, R. J. & D. Vericat, 2011a. Hydrology and sediment transport. In Barceló, D. & M. Petrovic (eds), The Ebro River Basin. Springer, Berlin: 21–46.Google Scholar
  10. Batalla, R. J. & D. Vericat, 2011b. A review of sediment quantity issues: examples from the River Ebro and adjacent basins (northeastern Spain). Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 7(2, Sp. Iss.): 256–268.Google Scholar
  11. Batalla, R. J., C. M. Gómez & G. M. Kondolf, 2004. Reservoir-induced hydrological changes in the Ebro River basin (NE Spain). Journal of Hydrology 290(1–2): 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bauer, C. J., 1998. Against the Current: Privatization, Water markets, and the State in Chile. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bauer, C. J., 2004. Siren Song: Chilean Water Law as a Model for International Reform. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Bauer, C. J., 2009. Dams and markets, rivers and electric power in Chile. Natural Resources Journal 49: 583–651.Google Scholar
  15. Benejam, L., J. Benito & E. Garcia-Berthou, 2010a. Decreases in condition and fecundity of freshwater fishes in highly polluted reservoir. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 210(1–4): 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benejam, L., P. L. Angermeier, A. Munné & E. Garcia-Berthou, 2010b. Assessing effects of water abstraction on fish assemblages in Mediterranean streams. Freshwater Biology 55(3): 628–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bertrán, C., J. Arenas & O. Parra, 2001. Macrofauna of the lower reach and estuary of Biobío River (Chile): changes of the river flow. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 74: 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brooks, B., T. Riley & R. Taylor, 2006. Water quality of effluent-dominated ecosystems: ecotoxicological, hydrological, and management considerations. Hydrobiologia 556: 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, E. & H. Peña, 2003. Systematic study of water management regimes, Chile. Global Water Partnership South America, Montevideo.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, L. R. & M. L. Bauer, 2010. Effects of hydrologic infrastructure on flow regimes of California’s Central Valley Rivers: implications for fish populations. River Research and Applications 26(6): 751–765.Google Scholar
  21. Brown, L. R. & T. Ford, 2002. Effects of flow on the fish communities of a regulated California River: implications for managing native fishes. River Research and Applications 18(4): 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buer, K., D. Forwalter, M. Kissel & B. Stohler, 1989. The middle Sacramento River: human impacts on physical and ecological processes along a meandering river. In Abell, D. L. (ed.), Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference: protection, management, and restoration for the 1990s. General Technical Report PSW-110, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California: 22–32.Google Scholar
  23. Bunn, S. E. & A. H. Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30(4): 492–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bureau of Reclamation, 2011a. Central Valley Project, Project Data. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Central%20Valley%20Project. Accessed 13 Oct 2011.
  25. Bureau of Reclamation, 2011b. Bureau of Reclamation Powerplants. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/projects/powerplants.jsp. Accessed 14 Oct 2011.
  26. California State Lands Commission, 1993. California’s Rivers: a public trust report. The Trust for Public Land, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  27. Canobbio, S., V. Mezzanotte, U. Sanfilippo & F. Benvenuto, 2009. Effect of multiple stressors on water quality and macroinvertebrate assemblages in an effluent-dominated stream. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 198(1): 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carrasco, L., C. Barata, E. Garcia-Berthou, A. Tobias, J. M. Bayona & S. Diez, 2011. Patterns of mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation in fish species downstream of a long-term mercury-contaminated site in the lower Ebro River (NE Spain). Chemosphere 84(11): 1642–1649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chiang, G., M. E. McMaster, R. Urrutia, M. F. Saavedra, J. F. Gavilán, F. Tucca, R. Barra & K. R. Munkittrick, 2011. Health status of native fish (Percilia gillissi and Trichomycterus areolatus) downstream of the discharge of effluent from a tertiary-treated elemental chlorine-free pulp mill in Chile. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30(8): 1793–1809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cid, N., C. Ibañez, A. Palanques & N. Prat, 2010. Patterns of metal bioaccumulation in two filter-feeding macroinvertebrates: exposure distribution, inter-species differences and variability across developmental stages. Science of the Total Environment 408(14, Sp. Iss.): 2795–2806.Google Scholar
  31. Cisternas, M., 1993. Descripción sedimentológica (granulometría) de los segmentos del curso superior e inferior del río Biobío. In Faranda, F. & O. Parra (eds), Serie Monografias Científicas, Vol. 12. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile: 293–311.Google Scholar
  32. Claver, A., P. Ormad, L. Rodriguez & J. L. Ovelleiro, 2006. Study of the presence of pesticides in surface waters in the Ebro river basin (Spain). Chemosphere 64(9): 1437–1443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clavero, M., F. Blanco-Garrido & J. Prenda, 2004. Fish fauna in Iberian Mediterranean river basins: biodiversity, introduced species and damming impacts. Aquatic Conservation 14(6): 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Clavero, M., V. Hermoso, N. Levin & S. Kark, 2010. Geographical linkages between threats and imperilment in freshwater fish in the Mediterranean basin. Diversity and Distributions 16(5): 744–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cocherell, S. A., G. J. Jones, J. B. Miranda, D. E. Cocherell, J. J. Cech, L. C. Thompson & A. P. Klimley, 2010. Distribution and movement of domestic rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, during pulsed flows in the South Fork American River, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 89(2): 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Conacher, A. J. & M. Sala, 1998. Land degradation in Mediterranean environments of the world: nature and extent, causes and solutions. Wiley, Chichester/New York.Google Scholar
  37. Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro (CHE), 2011. Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (MMA). http://www.chebro.es. Accessed 18 Nov 2011.
  38. Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, 2008. Delta Vision Strategic Plan. State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  39. Debels, P., R. Figueroa, R. Urrutia, R. Barra & X. Niell, 2005. Evaluation of water quality in the Chillán River (Central Chile) using physicochemical parameters and a modified Water Quality Index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 110(1–3): 301–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Department of Water Resources, 2009a. Sacramento River Hydrologic Region Report. In: California Water Plan Update 2009, Vol. 3. California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 160-09, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  41. Department of Water Resources, 2009b. California Water Plan Update 2009, Vol. 1. California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 160-09, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  42. Department of Water Resources, 2010. Dams within the jurisdiction of the State of California. California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams. http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/damlisting/index.cfm. Accessed 13 Oct 2011.
  43. Dewson, Z. S., A. B. W. James & R. G. Death, 2007. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dirección General de Aguas, 2004. Diagnóstico y clasificación de los cursos y cuerpos de agua según objectivos de calidad: cuenca del Rio Biobío. Gobierno de Chile, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago.Google Scholar
  45. Dirección General de Aguas, 2010a. Castro de embalses ubicados entre las regiones de Valparaíso y Araucanía. Informe final realizado por Aquaterra Ingenieros Limitada, S.I.T. No. 231. Gobierno de Chile, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago.Google Scholar
  46. Dirección General de Aguas, 2010b. Fija texto del código de aguas, DFL 1122, 26 January 2010. Gobierno de Chile, Ministerio de Justicia, Santiago.Google Scholar
  47. Domagalski, J. L., D. L. Knifong, P. D. Dileanis, L. R. Brown, J. May, T., V. Connor & C. N. Alpers, 2000. Water quality in the Sacramento River basin, California, 1994-98. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1215.Google Scholar
  48. Domagalski, J. L., 2001. Mercury and methylmercury in water and sediment of the Sacramento River basin, California. Applied Geochemistry 16(15): 1677–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. I. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Leveque, R. J. Naiman, A. H. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. J. Stiassny & C. A. Sullivan, 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81(2): 163–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Dynesius, M. & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266(5186): 753–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Elvira, B. & A. Almodóvar, 2001. Freshwater fish introductions in Spain: facts and figures at the beginning of the 21st century. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. European Communities, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  53. Feyrer, F., T. Sommer & W. Harrell, 2006. Managing floodplain inundation for native fish: production dynamics of age-0 splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in California’s Yolo Bypass. Hydrobiologia 573(1): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Focardi, S., C. Fossi, C. Leonzio, S. Corsolini & O. Parra, 1996. Persistent organochlorine residues in fish and water birds from the Biobio River, Chile. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 43(1): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Font, M. N., A. Rigol & J. Subirats, 2002. The Evolution of the National Water Regime in Spain, EUWARNESS Project. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Ciència Política i de Dret Públic, Bellaterra.Google Scholar
  56. Gallardo, B., M. Garcia, A. Cabezas, E. Gonzalez, M. Gonzalez, C. Ciancarelli & F. A. Comin, 2008. Macroinvertebrate patterns along environmental gradients and hydrological connectivity within a regulated river-floodplain. Aquatic Sciences 70(3): 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. García de Jalón, D., C. Montes, E. Barcelo, C. Casado & F. Menes, 1988. Effects of hydroelectric scheme on fluvial ecosystems within the Spanish Pyrenees. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 2(4): 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. García de Jalón, D., M. González del Tánago & C. Casado, 1992. Ecology of regulated streams in Spain: an overview. Limnetica 8: 161–166.Google Scholar
  59. García, A., K. Jorde, E. Habit, D. Caamaño & O. Parra, 2011. Downstream environmental effects of dam operations: changes in habitat quality for native fish species. River Research and Applications 27(3): 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Garrido, A. & M. R. Llamas, 2010. Water Policy in Spain. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden.Google Scholar
  61. Gasith, A. & V. H. Resh, 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Gilbert, G. K., 1917. Hydraulic-Mining Debris in the Sierra Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper: 105.Google Scholar
  63. Gleick, P. H., L. Allen, M. J. Cohen, H. Cooley, J. Christian-Smith, M. Heberger, J. Morrison, M. Palaniappan & P. Schulte, 2011. The World’s Water, Vol. 7. Island Press, Washtington, Covelo, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gonzalez, E., M. Gonzalez-Sanchis, A. Cabezas, F. A. Comin & E. Muller, 2010. Recent changes in the riparian forest of a large regulated Mediterranean river: implications for management. Environmental Management 45(4): 669–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Good, T. P., R. S. Waples & P. Adams, 2005. Updated Status of Federally Listed ESUs of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-66.Google Scholar
  66. Goodwin, P., K. Jorde, C. Meier & O. Parra, 2006. Minimizing environmental impacts of hydropower development: transferring lessons from past projects to a proposed strategy for Chile. Journal of Hydroinformatics 8(4): 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Grantham, T. E., A. M. Merenlender & V. H. Resh, 2010. Climatic influences and anthropogenic stressors: an integrated framework for streamflow management in Mediterranean-climate California, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 55 (Suppl. 1): 20–188.Google Scholar
  68. Grindlay, A. L., M. Zamorano, M. I. Rodríguez, E. Molero & M. A. Urrea, 2011. Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: integration of hydrological and regional planning at the Segura River Basin, southeast Spain. Land Use Policy 28(1): 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Habit, E., M. C. Belk, R. C. Tuckfield & O. Parra, 2006. Response of the fish community to human-induced changes in the Biobío River in Chile. Freshwater Biology 51: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hanak, E., J. Lund, A. Dinar, B. Gray, R. Howitt, J. Mount, P. Moyle & B. B. Thompson, 2011. Managing California’s water: from conflict to reconciliation. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  71. Hearne, R. R. & G. Donoso, 2005. Water institutional reforms in Chile. Water Policy 7: 53–69.Google Scholar
  72. Herren, J. R. & S. S. Kawasaki, 2001. Inventory of water diversions in four geographic areas in California’s Central Valley. In Brown, R. L. (ed.), Fish Bulletin 179 Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento: 71–76.Google Scholar
  73. Hildebrandt, A., M. Guillamon, S. Lacorte, R. Tauler & D. Barceló, 2008. Impact of pesticides used in agriculture and vineyards to surface and groundwater quality (North Spain). Water Research 42(13): 3315–3326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ibañez, C. & N. Prat, 2003. The environmental impact of the Spanish National Hydrological Plan on the lower Ebro River and delta. International Journal of Water Resources Development 19(3): 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ibañez, C., N. Prat & A. Canicio, 1996. Changes in the hydrology and sediment transport produced by large dams on the Lower Ebro River and its estuary. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 12: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ibañez, C., N. Prat, C. Duran, M. Pardos, A. Munné, R. Andreu, N. Caiola, N. Cid, H. Hampel, R. Sanchez & R. Trobajo, 2008. Changes in dissolved nutrients in the lower Ebro River: causes and consequences. Limnetica 27(1): 131–142.Google Scholar
  77. Ibañez, C., C. Alcaraz, N. Caiola, A. Rovira, R. Trobajo, M. Alonso, C. Duran, P. J. Jimenez, A. Munné & N. Prat, 2012. Regime shift from phytoplankton to macrophyte dominance in a large River: top-down versus bottom-up effects. Science of Total Environment 416: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Iglesias, A., L. Garrote, F. Flores & M. Moneo, 2007. Challenges to manage the risk of water security and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resources Management 21: 558–775.Google Scholar
  79. Isenberg, A., 2005. Mining California: an ecological history. Hill and Wang, New York.Google Scholar
  80. Jeffres, C., A. Klimley, J. Merz & J. Cech, 2006. Movement of Sacramento sucker, (Catostomus occidentalis), and hitch (Lavinia exilicauda), during a spring release of water from Camanche Dam in the Mokelumne River, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 75(4): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kaika, M., 2003. The WFD: a new directive for a changing social, policy and economic European framework. European Planning Studies 11(3): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Karrasch, B., O. Parra, H. Cid, M. Mehrens, P. Pacheco, R. Urrutia, C. Valdovinos & C. Zaror, 2006. Effects of pulp and paper mill effluents on the microplankton and microbial self-purification capabilities of the Biobio River, Chile. Science of the Total Environment 359(1–3): 194–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Katibah, E. F., 1984. A brief history of riparian forests in the Central Valley of California. In Warner, R. E. & K. M. Hendrix (eds), California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management. University of California Press, Berkeley: 23–29.Google Scholar
  84. Kiernan, J., P. B. Moyle, P. K. Crain. 2012. Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept. Ecological Applications 22:1472–1482.Google Scholar
  85. King, J., C. Brown & H. Sabet, 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19(5–6): 619–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Klimley, A., J. J. Cech, L. Thompson, S. Hamilton & S. Chun, 2005. Experimental and field studies to assess pulsed, water-flow impacts on the behavior and distribution of fishes in California Rivers, Annual Report 2004–2005. Prepared for the PIER Program Area, California Energy Commission.Google Scholar
  87. Kock, M., M. Farre, E. Martinez, K. Gajda-Schrantz, A. Ginebreda, A. Navarro, M. Lopez de Alda & D. Barcelo, 2010. Integrated ecotoxicological and chemical approach for the assessment of pesticide pollution in the Ebro River delta (Spain). Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 383(1–2, Sp. Iss.): 73–82.Google Scholar
  88. Kondolf, G. M. & R. J. Batalla, 2005. Hydrological effects of dams and water diversions on rivers of Mediterranean-climate regions: examples from California. In Garcia, C. & R. J. Batalla (eds), Catchment Dynamics and River Processes: Mediterranean and Other Climate Regions. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kondolf, G. M. & W. V. G. Matthews, 1991. Management of Coarse Sediment in Regulated Rivers of California. Technical Completion Report No. 40 UCAL-WRC-W-748, University of California Water Resources Center, Riverside.Google Scholar
  90. Kondolf, G. M., 1997. Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 21(4): 533–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Kupferberg, S. J., W. J. Palen, A. J. Lind, S. Bobzien, A. Catenazzi, J. O. E. Drennan & M. E. Power, 2012. Effects of flow regimes altered by dams on survival, population declines, and range-wide losses of California river-breeding frogs. Conservation Biology 26(3): 513–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lassaletta, L., H. García-Gómez, B. S. Gimeno & J. V. Rovira, 2009. Agriculture-induced increase in nitrate concentrations in stream waters of a large Mediterranean catchment over 25 years (1981–2005). Science of the Total Environment 407(23): 6034–6043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lieberman, D. M., M. J. Horn & S. Duffy, 2001. Effects of a temperature control device on nutrients, POM and plankton in the tailwaters below Shasta Lake, California. Hydrobiologia 452(1): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Light, T. & M. P. Marchetti, 2007. Distinguishing between invasions and habitat changes as drivers of diversity loss among California’s freshwater fishes. Conservation Biology 21(2): 434–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lindley, S. T., R. S. Schick, A. Agrawal, M. Goslin, T. E. Pearson, E. More, J. J. Anderson, B. May, S. Greene, C. Hanson, A. Low, D. McEwan, R. B. MacFarlane, C. Swanson & J. G. Williams, 2006. Historical population structure of Central Valley Steelhead and its alteration by dams. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 4: 1–19.Google Scholar
  96. Link, O., A. Espinoza, A. Stehr & A. García, 2008. Development and verification of JAZZ1D: a stream temperature model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment, Concepción.Google Scholar
  97. Loras, F., 1999. Water Resources Management in Spain: Sustainable Management and Rational Use of Water Resources. Institute for Legal Studies on the International Community, Rome: 148–167.Google Scholar
  98. Lund, J., E. Hanak, W. Fleenor, R. Howitt, J. F. Mount & P. B. Moyle, 2007. Envisioning Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  99. Magdaleno, F. & A. J. Fernández, 2011. Hydromorphological alteration of a large Mediterranean River: relative role of high and low flows on the evolution of riparian forests and channel morphology. River Research and Applications 27(3): 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Manosa, S., R. Mateo & R. Guitart, 2001. A review of the effects of agricultural and industrial contamination on the Ebro delta biota and wildlife. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 71(2): 187–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Marchetti, M. P. & P. B. Moyle, 2001. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecological Applications 11(2): 530–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Marr, S. M., M. P. Marchetti, J. D. Olden, E. García-Berthou, D. L. Morgan, I. Arismendi, J. A. Day, C. L. Griffiths & P. H. Skelton, 2010. Freshwater fish introductions in mediterranean-climate regions: are there commonalities in the conservation problem? Diversity and Distributions 16(4): 606–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Martí, E., J. L. Riera & F. Sabater, 2010. Effects of wastewater treatment plants on stream nutrient dynamics under water scarcity conditions. In Sabater, S. & D. Barceló (eds), Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean: Perspectives Under Global Climate Change. Springer, Berlin: 173–195.Google Scholar
  104. Maurer, E. P., I. T. Stewart, C. Bonfils, P. B. Duffy & D. Cayan, 2007. Detection, attribution, and sensitivity of trends toward earlier streamflow in the Sierra Nevada. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: D11118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. McKay, S. F. & A. J. King, 2006. Potential ecological effects of water extraction in small, unregulated streams. River Research and Applications 22: 1023–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Michalková, M., H. Piégay, G. M. Kondolf & S. E. Greco, 2011. Lateral erosion of the Sacramento River, California (1942–1999), and responses of channel and floodplain lake to human influences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36(2): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Minear, T., 2010. The downstream geomorphic effects of dams: a comprehensive and comparative approach. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  108. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2007a. Evaluación de los Impactos en España por Efecto del Cambio Climático en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.Google Scholar
  109. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2007b. Planificación Hidrológica: síntesis de los estudios generales de las Demarcaciones Hidrográficas en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.Google Scholar
  110. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2011. Inventario de Presas y Embalses. http://sig.marm.es/snczi/visor.html?herramienta=EstadisticasPresas. Accessed 26 Oct 2011.
  111. Moffatt, K. C., E. E. Crone, K. D. Holl, R. W. Schlorff & B. A. Garrison, 2005. Importance of hydrologic and landscape heterogeneity for restoring bank swallow (Riparia riparia) colonies along the Sacramento River, California. Restoration Ecology 13: 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Mora, E. A., S. T. Lindley, D. L. Erickson & A. P. Klimley, 2009. Do impassable dams and flow regulation constrain the distribution of green sturgeon in the Sacramento River, California? Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25(Suppl. 2): 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Mount, J., 1995. California Rivers and Streams: the conflict between fluvial process and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  114. Moyle, P. B. & J. F. Mount, 2007. Homogenous rivers, homogenous faunas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(14): 5711–5712.Google Scholar
  115. Moyle, P. B. & R. A. Leidy, 1992. Loss of biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems: evidence from fish faunas. In Fiedler, P. L. & S. K. Jain (eds), Conservation Biology: the Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation, and Management. Chapman & Hall, New York: 127–170.Google Scholar
  116. Moyle, P. B., 2002. Inland Fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  117. Moyle, P. B., J. V. E. Katz & R. M. Quiñones, 2011. Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biological Conservation 144(10): 2414–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Munné, A. & N. Prat, 2006. Ecological aspects of the Water Framework Directive, Chapter 3. In Mas-Pla, J. (ed.), The Water Framework Directive in Catalonia. Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona: 53–75.Google Scholar
  119. Munné, A., C. Solà, L. L. Tirapu, C. Barata, M. Rieradevall & N. Prat, 2012. Human pressure and its effects on water quality and biota in the Llobregat River. In Sabater, S., A. Ginebreda & D. Barceló (eds), The Llobregat: a history of a polluted Mediterranean River. Springer, Berlin: 1–29.Google Scholar
  120. Navarro-Ortega, A., R. Tauler, S. Lacorte & D. Barceló, 2010. Occurrence and transport of PAHs, pesticides and alkylphenols in sediment samples along the Ebro River basin. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 383(1–2, Sp. Iss.): 5–17.Google Scholar
  121. Nelson, A., 2011. Chile Dams Its Rivers to Unleash Its Economy Time Magazine. In: Time Inc. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2070816,00.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2011.
  122. Nilsson, C., C. A. Reidy, M. Dynesius & C. Revenga, 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308(5720): 405–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Olson, D. M., E. Dinerstein, E. D. Wikramanayake, N. D. Burgess, G. V. N. Powell, E. C. Underwood, J. A. D’amico, I. Itoua, H. E. Strand, J. C. Morrison, C. J. Loucks, T. F. Allnutt, T. H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J. F. Lamoreux, W. W. Wettengel, P. Hedao & K. R. Kassem, 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51: 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Opperman, J. J., R. Luster, B. A. McKenney, M. Roberts & A. W. Meadows, 2010. Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(2): 22–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Orrego, R., A. Burgos, G. Moraga-Cid, B. Inzunza, M. Gonzalez, A. Valenzuela, R. Barra & J. E. Gavilan, 2006. Effects of pulp and paper mill discharges on caged rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): biomarker responses along a pollution gradient in the Biobio River. Chile. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25(9): 2280–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Orrego, R., J. Guchardi, V. Hernandez, R. Krause, L. Roti, J. Armour, M. Ganeshakumar & D. Holdway, 2009. Pulp and paper mill effluent treatments have differential endocrine-disrupting effects on rainbow trout. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28(1): 181–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Oscoz, J., C. Duran, M. Pardos, J. Gil & A. Viamonte, 2008. Historical evolution of the biological water quality in the Ebro Basin (Spain) (1990–2005). Limnetica 27(1): 119–130.Google Scholar
  128. Parra, O., C. Valdovinos, E. Habit & R. Figueroa, 2004. Programa de monitoreo de la calidad del agua del sistema rio Biobío. Informe Tecnico, Centro de Ciencias Ambientales Eula-Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción. Google Scholar
  129. Parra, O., C. Valdovinos, E. Habit E & R. Figueroa, 2009. Long term study of the Biobío River: a complex multiuse fluvial system in Chile. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Chile.Google Scholar
  130. Pasternack, G. B., C. L. Wang & J. E. Merz, 2004. Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reach-scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California. River Research and Applications 20(2): 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Poff, N. L., J. D. Olden, D. M. Merritt & D. M. Pepin, 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(14): 7732–5737.Google Scholar
  132. Prat, N. & A. Estevan, 2006. Alternativas para la gestión del agua en Cataluña: una visión desde la perspectiva de la nueva cultura del agua. Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
  133. Prat, N. & A. Estevan, 2007. Sustainable alternatives of water management in urban areas of mediterraneanl coastal cities: the example of Barcelona metropolitan region (BMR) (NE Spain). In Afgan, N. H., Z. Bogdan, N. Duic & Z. Guzovic (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Dubrovnik Conference: sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 5–10 June 2005, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore: 261–269.Google Scholar
  134. Prat, N. & A. Munné, 2000. Water use and quality and stream flow in a Mediterranean stream. Water Research 34(15): 3876–3881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Prat, N. & M. Rieradevall, 2006. 25-years of biomonitoring in two Mediterranean streams (Llobregat and Besos basins. NE spain). Limnetica 25: 541–550.Google Scholar
  136. Prat, N. & J. V. Ward, 1994. The tamed river. In Margalef, R. (ed.), Limnology Now: A Paradigm of Planetary Problems. Elsevier, London: 219–236.Google Scholar
  137. Prat, N., G. González, M. I. Tort & M. Estrada, 1984. The Llobregat: a mediterranean river fed by the Pyrenees. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), The Ecology of European Rivers. Blackwell, London: 527–552.Google Scholar
  138. Prats, J., J. Dolz & J. Armengol, 2009. Variabilidad temporal en el comportamiento hidráulico del curso inferior del río Ebro. Ingeniería del Agua 16(4): 259–272.Google Scholar
  139. Prats, J., R. Val, J. Armengol & J. Dolz, 2010. Temporal variability in the thermal regime of the lower Ebro River (Spain) and alteration due to anthropogenic factors. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 387(1–2): 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Prats, J., J. Armengol, R. Marcé, M. Sánchez-Juny & J. Dolz, 2011. Dams and reservoirs in the lower Ebro River and its effects on the river thermal cycle. In Barceló, D. & M. Petrovic (eds), The Ebro River Basin. Springer, Berlin: 77–95.Google Scholar
  141. Pringle, C., 2003. What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important? Hydrological Processes 17(13): 2685–2689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Purkey, D. R., B. Joyce, S. Vicuna, M. W. Hanemann, L. L. Dale, D. Yates & J. A. Dracup, 2008. Robust analysis of future climate change impacts on water for agriculture and other sectors: a case study in the Sacramento Valley. Climatic Change 87: S109–S122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Richter, B. D., R. Mathews, D. L. Harrison & R. Wigington, 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13(1): 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Romaní, A. M., S. Sabater & I. Muñoz, 2011. The physical framework and historic human influences in the Ebro River. In Barceló, D. & M. Petrovic (eds), The Ebro River Basin. Springer, Berlin: 1–20.Google Scholar
  145. Rovira, A. & C. Ibañez, 2007. Sediment management options for the lower Ebro River and its Delta. Journal of Soils and Sediments 7(5): 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Sierra, J. P., A. Sánchez-Arcilla, P. A. Figueras, J. González del Río, E. K. Rassmussen & C. Mösso, 2004. Effects of discharge reductions on salt wedge dynamics of the Ebro River. River Research and Applications 20(1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Singer, M. B., 2007. The influence of major dams on hydrology through the drainage network of the Sacramento River basin. California. River Research and Applications 23(1): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Slater, D. W., 1963. Winter-run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River, California with notes on water temperature requirements at spawning. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report, Fisheries No. 461, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  149. Sommer, T. R., M. L. Nobriga, W. C. Harrell, W. Batham & W. J. Kimmerer, 2001. Floodplain rearing of juvenile Chinook salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58(2): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sommer, T. R., L. Conrad, G. O’Leary, F. Feyrer & H. C. William, 2002. Spawning and rearing of splittail in a model floodplain wetland. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131(5): 966–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Spinks, P. Q., G. B. Pauly, J. J. Crayon & H. Bradley Shaffer, 2003. Survival of the western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) in an urban California environment. Biological Conservation 113(2): 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Tàbara, J. & A. Ilhan, 2008. Culture as trigger for sustainability transition in the water domain: the case of the Spanish water policy and the Ebro river basin. Regional Environmental Change 8(2): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Terrado, M., D. Barceló & R. Tauler, 2011. Chemometric analysis and mapping of environmental pollution sources in the Ebro River Basin. In Barceló, D. & M. Petrovic (eds), The Ebro River. Springer, Berlin: 331–372.Google Scholar
  154. Thoms, M. C., 2006. Variability in riverine ecosystems. River Research and Applications 22(2): 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Thoms, M. C. & F. Sheldon, 2000. Water resource development and hydrological change in a large dryland river: the Barwon–Darling River, Australia. Journal of Hydrology 228(1–2): 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Torrecilla, N. J. & J. Martínez-Gil, 2005. The new culture of water in Spain: a philosophy towards sustainable development. E-WAter 2005(07): 1–20.Google Scholar
  157. Torrecilla, N. J., J. P. Galve, L. G. Zaera, J. F. Retamar & A. N. A. Álvarez, 2005. Nutrient sources and dynamics in a mediterranean fluvial regime (Ebro River, NE Spain) and their implications for water management. Journal of Hydrology 304(1–4): 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Underwood, E. C., J. H. Viers, K. R. Klausmeyer, R. L. Cox & M. R. Shaw, 2009. Threats and biodiversity in the mediterranean biome. Diversity and Distributions 15: 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. United Nations, 2012. UN Data, Country Data Services. http://data.un.org/Default.aspx. Accessed 18 May 2012.
  160. Valdovinos, C. & O. Parra, 2006. La cuenca del Río Biobío: historia natural de un ecosistema de uso múltiple Publicaciones Centro EULA. Centro de Ciencias Ambientales EULA, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción.Google Scholar
  161. van Beusekom, O. C., E. Eljarrat, D. Barcelo & A. A. Koelmans, 2006. Dynamic modeling of food-chain accumulation of brominated flame retardants in fish from the Ebro river basin, Spain. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25(10): 2553–2560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Vericat, D. & R. J. Batalla, 2005. Sediment transport in a highly regulated fluvial system during two consecutive floods (lower Ebro River, NE Iberian Peninsula). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30(4): 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Vörösmarty, C. J. & D. Sahagian, 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. BioScience 50(9): 753–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Vörösmarty, C. J., P. B. McIntyre, M. O. Gessner, D. Dudgeon, A. Prusevich, P. Green, S. Glidden, S. E. Bunn, C. A. Sullivan, C. Reidy Liermann & P. M. Davies, 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467: 555–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Walsh, C. J., A. H. Roy, J. W. Feminella, P. D. Cottingham, P. M. Groffman & R. P. Morgan, 2005. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3): 706–723. doi: 10.1899/04-028.1.Google Scholar
  166. Williams, S. & S. Carriger, 2006. Water and sustainable development: lessons from Chile Policy Brief, No 2. Technical Committee (TEC), Global Water Partnership, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  167. World Commission on Dams, 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-making. Earthscan Publications, London and Sterling, Virgina.Google Scholar
  168. Wright, S. A. & D. H. Schoellhamer, 2004. Trends in the sediment yield of the Sacramento River, California, 1957–2001. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science 2(2): 1–14.Google Scholar
  169. Yates, D., H. Galbraith, D. Purkey, A. Huber-Lee, J. Sieber, J. West, S. Herrod-Julius & B. Joyce, 2008. Climate warming, water storage, and Chinook salmon in California’s Sacramento Valley. Climatic Change 91(3–4): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Yoshiyama, R. M., E. R. Gerstung, F. W. Fisher & P. B. Moyle, 2001. Historic and present distribution of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley drainage of California. In Brown, R. L. (ed.), Fish Bulletin 179 Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento: 71–76.Google Scholar
  171. Young, P., J. Cech & L. Thompson, 2011. Hydropower-related pulsed-flow impacts on stream fishes: a brief review, conceptual model, knowledge gaps, and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries: 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore E. Grantham
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Ricardo Figueroa
    • 2
  • Narcís Prat
    • 1
  1. 1.Grup de Recerca Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM), Departament d’Ecologia, Facultat de BiologiaUniversitat de Barcelona (UB)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Center of Environmental Sciences EULA-ChileUniversity of ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  3. 3.Center for Watershed SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations