, Volume 691, Issue 1, pp 81–88 | Cite as

Herbivory limits the yellow water lily in an overgrown lake and in flowing water

  • Johan A. StenbergEmail author
  • Johanna E. Stenberg
Primary Research Paper


Aquatic macrophytes with floating leaves are often key ecological species that affect entire aquatic ecosystems. Here we describe an investigation of the importance of insect herbivory for population growth and leaf senescence in the yellow water lily (Nuphar lutea). In order to gain a general picture of the importance of herbivory under different conditions, we experimentally manipulated herbivory in a large lily population in natural still water and observed the natural development of 32 smaller populations in flowing water. Herbivory drastically increased leaf senescence, reducing leaf density. In the still water, over one summer, leaf density increased by a factor of 1.23 in the presence of water lily leaf beetles and 1.61 when herbivory was eliminated. In flowing water, population growth was restricted mainly by leaf crowdedness, which limited large dense populations. Herbivory by water lily leaf beetles also had a limiting effect on yellow water lily, again mainly in large dense populations. Small populations supported a lower density of beetles. Previous studies have not addressed population-level responses of vascular plants with floating leaves. Our results suggest that herbivory can result in greater light penetration into the water and reduce “enemy-free space” for aquatic species that find such space in water lily stands. We suggest that the water lily leaf beetle should be considered an “ecological engineer.”


Nuphar lutea Galerucella nymphaeae Pyrrhalta Biological control Herbivory 



We thank Göran & Sölvi Stenberg for accommodation and for placing a boat at our disposal during summer 2010. We are also grateful to Hanna Stenberg for technical assistance in the field. Finally, we would like to thank Christer Björkman, Peter Dalin, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on a previous version of this paper.

Supplementary material

10750_2012_1035_MOESM1_ESM.doc (9.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 9474 kb)
10750_2012_1035_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (28 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 28 kb)


  1. Borer, E. T., E. W. Seabloom, J. B. Shurin, K. Anderson, C. A. Blanchette, B. Broitman, S. D. Cooper & B. S. Halpern, 2005. What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86: 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crawley, M. J., 1989. Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 531–564.Google Scholar
  3. Crawley, M. J., 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-plus. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Elger, A., G. Bornette, M. H. Barrat-Segretain & C. Amoros, 2004. Disturbances as a structuring factor of plant palatability in aquatic communities. Ecology 85: 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horppila, J. & L. Nurminen, 2005. Effects of different macrophyte growth forms on sediment and P resuspension in a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 545: 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones, C. G., J. H. Lawton & M. Shachak, 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Juliano, S. A., 1988. Chrysomelid beetles on water lily leaves: herbivore density, leaf survival, and herbivore maturation. Ecology 69: 1294–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kouki, J., 1991a. The effect of the water-lily beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae, on leaf production and leaf longevity of the yellow water-lily, Nuphar lutea. Freshwater Biology 26: 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kouki, J., 1991b. Tracking spatially variable resources: an experimental study on the oviposition of the water-lily beetle. Oikos 61: 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kouki, J., 1993a. Female’s preference for oviposition site and larval performance in the water-lily beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia 93: 42–47.Google Scholar
  11. Kouki, J., 1993b. Herbivory modifies the production of different leaf types in the yellow water-lily, Nuphar lutea (Nymphaeceae). Functional Ecology 7: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lodge, D. M., 1991. Herbivory on freshwater macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 41: 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maron, J. L. & E. Crone, 2006. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 2575–2584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moss, B., R. Kornijow & G. J. Measey, 1998. The effects of nymphaeid (Nuphar lutea) density and predation by perch (Perca fluviatilis) on the zooplankton communities in a shallow lake. Freshwater Biology 39: 689–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nurminen, L. & J. Horppila, 2006. Efficiency of fish feeding on plant-attached prey: effects of inorganic turbidity and plant-mediated changes in the light environment. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 1550–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nurminen, L., J. Horppila, J. Lappalainen & T. Malinen, 2003. Implications of rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) herbivory on submerged macrophytes in a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 506–509: 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nurminen, L., Z. Pekcan-Hekim, S. Repka & J. Horppila, 2010. Effect of prey type and inorganic turbidity on littoral predator-prey interactions in a shallow lake: an experimental approach. Hydrobiologia 646: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Otto, C. & J. B. Wallace, 1989. Life cycle variation and habitat longevity in waterlily leaf beetles. Holarctic Ecology 12: 144–151.Google Scholar
  19. Schlacher, T. A. & G. Cronin, 2007. A trophic cascade in a macrophyte-based food web at the land-water ecotone. Ecological Research 22: 749–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Semenchenko, V. P., 2008. Role of macrophytes in the variability of zooplankton community structure in the littoral zone of shallow lakes. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 1: 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Setälä, H. & I. Mäkelä, 1991. Galerucella nymphaeae (Col., Chrysomelidae) grazing increases Nuphar leaf production and affects carbon and nitrogen dynamics in ponds. Oecologia 86: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shurin, J. B., E. T. Borer, E. W. Seabloom, K. Anderson, C. A. Blanchette, B. Broitman, S. D. Cooper & B. S. Halpern, 2002. A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters 5: 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shurin, J. B., D. S. Gruner & H. Hillebrand, 2006. All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Velde, G. & T. C. M. Brock, 1991. Seasonal and spatial variation in the abundance of aquatic phytophilous macroinvertebrate fauna on Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm. in an oxbow lake. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 24: 779–785.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, J. B. & J. O’Hop, 1985. Life on a fast pad: waterlily leaf beetle impact on water lilies. Ecology 66: 1534–1544.Google Scholar
  26. Wahl, M., 2008. Ecological modulation of environmental stress: interactions between ultraviolet radiation, epibiotic snail embryos, plants and herbivores. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 549–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallace, J. B. & J. O’Hop, 1985. Life on a fast pad – waterlily leaf beetle impact on water lilies. Ecology 66: 1534–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations