Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 658, Issue 1, pp 303–315 | Cite as

Predation by the invasive American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana, on the invasive zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha Pallas: the potential for control and facilitation

  • Philine S. E. zu ErmgassenEmail author
  • David C. Aldridge
Primary research paper

Abstract

Non-indigenous crayfish often have major ecological impacts on invaded water bodies, and have contributed to the decline of native crayfish species throughout Europe. The American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, is the most widespread invasive crayfish in Great Britain, where the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, is similarly an invasive pest species. The potential for the American signal crayfish to regulate zebra mussel populations was investigated through a series of laboratory experiments. Crayfish were found to be highly size selective, consuming significantly more of the smallest size class of zebra mussels offered (7–12 mm), over medium (16–21 mm) and large (25–30 mm). Crayfish feeding rate on zebra mussels was not altered when mussels were presented clumped together in natural druses compared with mussels in a disassembled druse. Crayfish spent significantly more time foraging when mussels were unattached, and a greater proportion of attacks were on medium and large than on small mussels (83% of attacks were on medium and large mussels when unattached as opposed to 47% when on druses). Individual crayfish feeding rate decreased significantly at densities of > ~5 crayfish m−2. Signal crayfish are, therefore, unlikely to be able to significantly impact established populations of zebra mussels in the wild, although zebra mussels have the potential to provide crayfish with a substantial food source.

Keywords

Non-native Exotic Alien Decapod Control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Claudia Comberti, Ian Goldstone, Caroline Dingle and Jonathan Gair for their assistance. We would also like to thank Chivers Farm for access to Impington Lake, and Roy Grubb, Alf Ives and Adam Hall for zebra mussel collection. This study was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council studentship to P.S.E.z.E. (NER/S/A/2005/13273) and the British water industry.

References

  1. Aldridge, D. C., P. Elliott & G. D. Moggridge, 2004. The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biological Conservation 119: 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, R. T., 2002. The ineffectiveness of grooming in prevention of body fouling in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Aquaculture 208: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovbjerg, R. V., 1953. Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen). Physiological Zoology 26: 173–178.Google Scholar
  4. Bovbjerg, R. V., 1956. Some factors affecting aggressive behaviour in crayfish. Physiological Zoology 26: 127–136.Google Scholar
  5. Brazner, J. C. & D. A. Jensen, 2000. Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas)) colonization of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus (Girard)) in Green Bay, Lake Michigan. The American Midland Naturalist 143: 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, K. M., 1998. The role of shell strength in selective foraging by crayfish for gastropod prey. Freshwater Biology 40: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruno, J. F., J. J. Stachowicz & M. D. Bertness, 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole, P. A. Raymond, D. L. Strayer, M. L. Pace, S. E. G. Findlay & D. T. Fischer, 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corkum, L. D. & D. J. Cronin, 2004. Habitat complexity reduces aggression and enhances consumption in crayfish. Journal of Ethology 22: 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covich, A. P., L. L. Dye & J. S. Mattice, 1981. Crayfish predation on Corbicula under laboratory conditions. American Midland Naturalist 105: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, L., W. E. Yeomans & C. E. Adams, 2006. The impact of introduced signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus on stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16: 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley, M. J., 2002. Statistical Computing. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  13. Ďuriš, Z., I. Horká & A. Petrusek, 2007. Invasive zebra mussel colonisation of invasive crayfish: a case study. Hydrobiologia 590: 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edsman, L. & A. Jonsson, 1996. The effect of size, antennal injury, ownership, and ownership duration on fighting success in male signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 72: 80–87.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, P., D. C. Aldridge, G. D. Moggridge & M. Chipps, 2007. The increasing effects of zebra mussels on water installations in England. Water and Environment Journal 19: 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flint, R. W., 1977. Migration and distribution of the crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in Lake Tahoe. American Midland Naturalist 97: 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, D. W., D. W. Schloesser, J. H. Leach & W. P. Koalak, 1991. Distribution and dispersal of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Great Lakes region. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 1381–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guan, R., 2000. Abundance and production of the introduced signal crayfish in a British lowland river. Aquaculture International 8: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guan, R. & P. R. Wiles, 1996. Growth, density and biomass of crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a British lowland river. Aquatic Living Resources 9: 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guan, R. & P. R. Wiles, 1997. Ecological impact of introduced crayfish on benthic fishes in a British lowland river. Conservation Biology 11: 641–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guan, R. & P. R. Wiles, 1998. Feeding ecology of the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river. Aquaculture 169: 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guiaşu, R. C. & D. W. Dunham, 1999. Aggression and Competition in the Surface Water Cambarus (Decopoda, Cambaridae) Crayfish Species of Ontario, Canada: An Overview. In Schram, F. R. & J. C. von Vaupel Klein (eds.), Crustaceans and the Biodiversity Crisis. Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands: 701–717.Google Scholar
  23. Hanson, J. M., P. A. Chambers & E. E. Prepas, 1990. Selective foraging by the crayfish Orconectes virilis and its impact on macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 24: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobbs III, H. H., J. P. Jass & J. V. Huner, 1989. A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 56: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holdich, D. M., 2000. The introduction of alien crayfish species into Britain for commercial exploitation – an own goal? Crustacean Issues 12: 85–97.Google Scholar
  26. Holdich, D. M. & M. Pöckl, 2007. Invasive Crustaceans in European Inland Waters. In Gherardi, F. (ed.), Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution, and Threats. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 29–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller, R. P., P. S. E. zu Ermgassen & D. C. Aldridge, 2009. Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conservation Biology 23: 1526–1534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerney, M. P. & B. S. Morton, 1970. The distribution of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) in Britain. Journal of Conchology 27: 97–100.Google Scholar
  29. Kirjavainen, J. & K. Westman, 1999. Natural history and development of the introduced signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a small, isolated Finnish lake, from 1968 to 1993. Aquatic Living Resources 12: 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozák, P., J. Kajtman, J. Kouřil & T. Policar, 2000. The effect of crayfish density and shelter number on the daily activity of signal crayfish. Freshwater Crayfish 13: 457–462.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis, S. D., 2002. Pacifastacus. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 511–540.Google Scholar
  32. Love, J. & J. F. Savino, 1993. Crayfish (Orconectes virilis) predation on zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8: 253–259.Google Scholar
  33. MacIsaac, H. J., 1994. Size-selective predation on zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) by crayfish (Orconectes propinquus). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maitland, P. S., 1996. The North American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, established in the wild in Scotland. Aquatic Conservation 6: 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manly, B. J. F., 1974. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics 30: 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manly, B. J. F., 1993. Comments on design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments. Oecologia 93: 149–152.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, G. W. & L. D. Corkum, 1994. Predation of zebra mussels by crayfish. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 1867–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakagawa, S., 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioural Ecology 15: 1044–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. National Biodiversity Network, 2009. Available from: http://data.nbn.org.uk/. Accessed September 2009.
  40. Nyström, P., 2002. Ecology. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 192–224.Google Scholar
  41. Nyström, P. & J. R. Pérez, 1998. Crayfish predation on the common pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis): the effect of habitat complexity and snail size on foraging efficiency. Hydrobiologia 368: 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Neill, C. R. J., 1997. Economic impact of zebra mussels – results of the 1995 National Zebra Mussel Information Clearinghouse study. Great Lakes Research Review 3: 35–44.Google Scholar
  43. Pace, M. L., S. E. G. Findlay & D. Fischer, 1998. Effects of an invasive bivalve on the zooplankton community of the Hudson River. Freshwater Biology 39: 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perry, W. L., D. M. Lodge & G. A. Lamberti, 1997. Impact of crayfish predation on exotic zebra mussels and native invertebrates in a lake-outlet stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piesik, Z., 1974. The role of the crayfish Orconectes limosus (Raf.) in extinction of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.) subsisting on steelon-net. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 21: 401–410.Google Scholar
  46. Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga & D. Morrison, 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prejs, A., I. Lewandowski & A. Stanczykowska-Piotrowska, 1990. Size-selective predation by the roach (Rutilis rutilus) on zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): field studies. Oecologia 83: 378–384.Google Scholar
  48. Reynolds, J. D. & R. Donohoe, 2001. Crayfish predation experiments on the introduced zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in Ireland, and their potential for biocontrol. Bulletin Francais de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 361: 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ricciardi, A., 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 2513–2525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ricciardi, A., 2006. Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Diversity and Distributions 12: 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ricciardi, A. & H. J. MacIsaac, 2000. Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto-Caspian species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 62–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ricciardi, A., F. G. Whoriskey & J. B. Rasmussen, 1997. The role of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in structuring macroinvertebrate communities on hard substrata. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2596–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ricciardi, A., R. J. Neves & J. B. Rasmussen, 1998. Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roa, R., 1992. Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments. Oecologia 89: 509–515.Google Scholar
  55. Rovero, F., R. N. Hughes & G. Chelazzi, 2000. When time is of the essence: choosing a currency for prey-handling costs. Journal of Applied Animal Ecology 69: 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ruxton, G. D. & G. Beauchamp, 2008. Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing. Behavioural Ecology 19: 193–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schreiber, S., T. Odelstrom, K. Pettersson & D. Eichelberg, 1998. The zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha as a food source for the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in Lake Erken – laboratory experiments. Ergebnisse der Limnologie 51: 169–176.Google Scholar
  58. Simberloff, D., 2006. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecology Letters 9: 912–919.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Stewart, T. W., J. G. Miner & R. L. Lowe, 1998. An experimental analysis of crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) effects on a Dreissena-dominated benthic macroinvertebrate community in western Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strayer, D. L. & H. M. Malcom, 2005. Long-term demography of a zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population. Freshwater Biology 51: 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Strayer, D. L., N. F. Caraco, J. J. Cole, S. Findlay & M. L. Pace, 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves – a case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. Bioscience 49: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van der Velde, G., S. Rajagopal, B. Kelleher, I. B. Musko & A. Bij de Vaate, 2000. Ecological impact of crustacean invaders: general considerations and examples from the River Rhine. Crustacean Issues 12: 3–33.Google Scholar
  63. Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco & J. M. Melillo, 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vogt, G., 2002. Functional Anatomy. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 53–151.Google Scholar
  65. Warner, G. F., 1996. Factors affecting the selection of pond snail prey by signal crayfish. Freshwater Crayfish 11: 194–202.Google Scholar
  66. Warner, G. F., J. C. Wood & R. H. Orr-Ewing, 1995. Signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) feeding on pond snails: optimal foraging? Freshwater Crayfish 8: 352–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philine S. E. zu Ermgassen
    • 1
    Email author
  • David C. Aldridge
    • 1
  1. 1.Aquatic Ecology Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations