Effect of anthropogenic feeding regimes on activity rhythms of laboratory mussels exposed to natural light
- 256 Downloads
Anthropogenic disturbance may affect animal behaviour and should generally be minimised. We examined how anthropogenic disturbance (24 h food deprivation) affected circadian rhythms in laboratory mussels Mytilus edulis exposed to natural light in the absence of tides. Repeated measures data were collected on mussel gape angle, exhalant pumping and valve adduction using a Hall sensor system over eight consecutive 24 h periods when exposed to two feeding conditions after 24 h food deprivation. Mussels (fed once per day at either midday or midnight) exposed to natural light showed a clear day–night rhythm with increased nocturnal activity: significantly greater gape angle, increased exhalant pumping and had significantly higher valve adduction rates. However, circadian rhythms were less clear directly after anthropogenic food deprivation, in terms of the circadian rhythm in gape angle becoming significantly more apparent over the following days. Unlike mussels fed at midnight, those fed at midday displayed no significant change in gape angle from the hour before to the hour after they were fed, i.e. mussels given food at midday reacted to this food less than mussels fed at midnight. We suggest that independent of feeding time, laboratory mussels exposed to natural light and free from anthropogenic disturbance increase feeding activity at night because their circadian rhythms are strongly influenced by light levels. This study emphasises that the behaviour of animals in the laboratory and in the wild can be altered by anthropogenic disturbances such as vibrations caused by experimental setups and artificial illumination at night.
KeywordsAnthropogenic Circadian Tidal Lunar Light Zeitgeber Bivalve Behaviour Rhythm
We are most grateful to Jonathan Green, Graeme Hays, Martin Lilley and James Wilson for help during the study. This work was funded by the European Social Fund and Deep Dock Ltd.
- Andreu, B., 1960. Ensayos sobre el efecto de la luz en el ritmo de crecimiento mejillón (Mytilus edulis) en la Ria de Vigo. Boletin de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural. Seccion Biologica 58: 217–236.Google Scholar
- Clarke, T. A., 1978. Diel feeding patterns of 16 species of mesopelagic fishes from Hawaiian waters. Fishery Bulletin 76: 495–513.Google Scholar
- Coulthard, H. S., 1929. Growth of the sea mussel. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries 4: 123–136.Google Scholar
- Dodgson, R. W., 1928. Report on mussel purification. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fishery Investigations, London (Series II) 10(1): 1–498.Google Scholar
- Goss-Custard, J., 1996. The Oystercatcher: From Individuals to Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Huntsman, A. G., 1921. The effect of light on growth in the mussel. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Canada 15: 23–28.Google Scholar
- Martella, T., 1974. Some factors influencing byssus thread production in Mytilus edulis (mollusca: Bivalvia) Linnaeus, 1758. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 3: 171–177.Google Scholar
- Morton, B., 2001. The evolution of eyes in the Bivalvia. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 39: 165–205.Google Scholar
- Robson, A. A., 2008. Gaping at Environmental Variability: How do Bivalves React to Changing Circumstance? Swansea University, UK: 248 pp.Google Scholar
- Robson, A. A., C. Garcia de Leaniz, R. P. Wilson & L. G. Halsey, 2010. Behavioural adaptations of mussels to varying levels of food availability and predation risk. Journal of Molluscan Studies. doi: 10.1093/mollus/eyq025.
- Ropert-Coudert, Y. & R. P. Wilson, 2004. Subjectivity in bio-logging science: do logged data mislead? Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research Special Issue 58: 23–33.Google Scholar
- Saurel, C., J. C. Gascoigne, M. R. Palmer & M. J. Kaiser, 2007. In situ mussel feeding behavior in relation to multiple environmental factors: regulation through food concentration and tidal conditions. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1919–1929.Google Scholar
- Seed, R., 1976. Ecology of marine mussels. In Bayne, B. L. (ed.), Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 13–65.Google Scholar
- Strömgren, T., 1976a. Length growth of Mytilus edulis (Bivalvia) in relation to photoperiod, irradiance and spectral distribution of light. Sarsia 61: 31–40.Google Scholar
- Strömgren, T., 1976b. Growth patterns of Mytilus edulis in relation to individual variation, light conditions, feeding and starvation. Sarsia 60: 25–39.Google Scholar
- Theede, H., 1963. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Filtrierleistung der Miesmuschel Mytilus edulis L. Kieler Meeresforsch 19: 20–41.Google Scholar
- Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar