, Volume 660, Issue 1, pp 93–103 | Cite as

Invasive fish species in the largest lakes of Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England: the collective UK experience

  • I. J. WinfieldEmail author
  • J. M. Fletcher
  • J. B. James


An invasive species is defined as an alien (or introduced or non-native) species whose establishment and spread threaten ecosystems, habitats or species with harm. Such threats to UK lake fish communities have long been appreciated and this review assembles case histories, including new data, from the largest lakes of Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England to examine the hypothesis that at least some of these introductions have become invasive. Loch Lomond in Scotland has experienced six introductions [chub (Leuciscus cephalus), common bream (Abramis brama), crucian carp (Carassius carassius), dace (Leuciscus leuciscus), gudgeon (Gobio gobio) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus)], of which the most significant has been that of the percid ruffe, which has been implicated in a recent decline of the native coregonid whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus). In Northern Ireland, the introduction of the cyprinid roach (Rutilus rutilus) to Lough Neagh has apparently had a negative impact on some overwintering waterfowl, although the native coregonid pollan (Coregonus autumnalis) remains abundant. Llyn Tegid in Wales has received three introductions [rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), ruffe and silver bream (Blicca bjoerkna)], although no impacts on the native whitefish or other fish populations have been observed. In England, individuals of at least 12 native and non-native fish species have been brought to Windermere for the purpose of live-baiting, although only those of the cyprinids roach and common bream have established abundant populations. At the same time, the native salmonid Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) has declined markedly while the native esocid pike (Esox lucius) has shown changes in abundance, distribution and individual condition, although these developments have not been shown to be causally linked. None of these introductions were sanctioned by appropriate fisheries or other regulatory bodies and almost all of them probably arose from the release or escape of live-bait used by pike anglers. Of the 10 species introductions documented here, four (common bream, gudgeon, roach and ruffe) have established abundant populations and two of these (roach and ruffe) have apparently caused or currently threaten harm, supporting the hypothesis that at least some of these introductions have become invasive.


Species introductions Alien species Loch Lomond Lough Neagh Llyn Tegid Windermere 



We thank Colin Bean of Scottish Natural Heritage, Cameron Durie of the Environment Agency and Rhian Thomas of the Countryside Council for Wales for their significant contributions to components of the work reviewed here. We are also grateful to Colin Adams and Elizabeth Etheridge of the University of Glasgow and Chris Harrod of Queen’s University Belfast for helpful discussions concerning the current situations at Loch Lomond and Lough Neagh, respectively. We acknowledge the Freshwater Biological Association for their joint stewardship of the Windermere long-term data. Major components of this work were funded by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Countryside Council for Wales, Environment Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.


  1. Adams, C. E., 1991. Shift in pike, Esox lucius (L.), predation pressure following the introduction of ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.) to Loch Lomond. Journal of Fish Biology 38: 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. E., 1994. The fish community of Loch Lomond: its history and its rapidly changing status. Hydrobiologia 290: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. E. & J. Mitchell, 1995. The response of a Grey Heron Ardea cinerea breeding colony to rapid change in prey species. Bird Study 42: 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, C. E. & R. Tippett, 1991. Powan, Coregonus lavaretus (L.), ova predation by newly introduced ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.), in Loch Lomond, Scotland. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 22: 239–246.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, C. R., 1977. The occurrence of rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) in Llyn Tegid. Nature in Wales 15: 31–50.Google Scholar
  6. Boon, P. J. & C. W. Bean, in press. Freshwater non-native species—prevention, control or eradication? In Baxter, J. M. & C. A. Galbraith (eds), Species Management: Challenges and Solutions for the 21st Century. TSO Scotland, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. Bremner, A. & K. Park, 2007. Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biological Conservation 139: 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colautti, R. I. & H. J. MacIsaac, 2004. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Diversity and Distributions 10: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copp, G. H., P. G. Bianco, N. G. Bogutskaya, T. Erős, I. Falka, M. T. Ferreira, M. G. Fox, J. Freyhof, R. E. Gozlan, J. Grabowska, V. Kováč, R. Moreno-Amich, A. M. Naseka, M. Peňáz, M. Povž, M. Przybylski, M. Robillard, I. C. Russell, S. Stakėnas, S. Šumer, A. Vila-Gispert & C. Wiesner, 2005. To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21: 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cragg-Hine, D., 1973. Coarse fish and fishery management in Northern Ireland. In Proceedings of the 6th British Coarse Fish Conference. University of Liverpool, Liverpool: 52–59.Google Scholar
  11. Devine, J. A., C. E. Adams & P. S. Maitland, 2000. Changes in reproductive strategy in the ruffe during a period of establishment in a new habitat. Journal of Fish Biology 56: 1488–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etheridge, E. C. & C. E. Adams, 2008. Bream (Abramis brama), a new fish species confirmed in Loch Lomond. Glasgow Naturalist 25: 93–94.Google Scholar
  13. Grainger, R. C., 1979. The occurrence of silver bream (Blicca bjoerkna (L.)) in Llyn Tegid. Nature in Wales 16: 250–251.Google Scholar
  14. Harrod, C., D. Griffiths, T. K. McCarthy & R. Rosell, 2001. The Irish pollan, Coregonus autumnalis: options for its conservation. Journal of Fish Biology 59(Suppl A): 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkins, G. J., M. C. Perry & M. J. Prior, 2008. The climate of the United Kingdom and recent trends. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter: 117.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, I. D., I. J. Winfield & F. Carse, 2008. Assessment of long-term changes in habitat availability for Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in a temperate lake using oxygen profiles and hydroacoustic surveys. Freshwater Biology 53: 393–402.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, G. J. A. & K. U. Vickers, 1993. The fish of Lough Neagh, Part A: a historical and taxonomic perspective of the fish fauna of Lough Neagh. In Wood, R. B. & R. V. Smith (eds), Lough Neagh. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 381–395.Google Scholar
  18. Le Cren, E. D., 2001. The Windermere perch and pike project. Freshwater Forum 15: 3–34.Google Scholar
  19. Leah, R. T., 2003. The ecology and conservation of the fish of Llyn Tegid. In Gritten, R. H., Duigan, C. A. & H. Millband (eds), Llyn Tegid Symposium: The Ecology, Conservation and Environmental History of the Largest Natural Lake in Wales. University of Liverpool, Liverpool: 115–138.Google Scholar
  20. McCafferty, D. J., 2005. The dietary response of otters (Lutra lutra) to introduced ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) in Loch Lomond, Scotland. Journal of Zoology 266: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McNeely, J. A., Mooney, H. A., Neville, L. E., Schei, P. & J. K. Waage (eds), 2001. A Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland: 50 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Warke, G. M. A., K. R. Day, J. E. Greer & R. D. Davidson, 1994. Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo [L]) populations and patterns of abundance at breeding and feeding sites in Northern Ireland, with particular reference to Lough Neagh. Hydrobiologia 279–280: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Watson, J., 1899. The English Lake District Fisheries. George Routledge and Sons Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  24. Went, A. E. J., 1950. Notes on the introduction of some freshwater fish into Ireland. Journal of the Irish Department of Agriculture 47: 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Winfield, I. J., 1992. Threats to the lake fish communities of the U.K. arising from eutrophication and species introductions. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 42: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winfield, I. J. & C. W. Bean, 1991. First record of the carp. Cyprinus carpio L., in the Lough Neagh catchment (Northern Ireland). Journal of Fish Biology 38: 629–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winfield, I. J. & N. C. Durie, 2004. Fish introductions and their management in the English Lake District. Fisheries Management and Ecology 11: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winfield, D. K. & I. J. Winfield, 1994a. Possible competitive interactions between overwintering tufted duck (Aythya fuligula (L.)) and fish populations of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: evidence from diet studies. Hydrobiologia 279(280): 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winfield, I. J. & D. K. Winfield, 1994b. Feeding ecology of the diving ducks pochard (Aythya ferina), tufted duck (A. fuligula), scaup (A. marila) and goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) overwintering on Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Freshwater Biology 32: 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winfield, I. J., D. K. Winfield & C. M. Tobin, 1992. Interactions between the roach, Rutilus rutilus, and waterfowl populations of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winfield, I. J., C. M. Tobin & C. R. Montgomery, 1993. Ecological studies of the fish community. In Wood, R. B. & R. V. Smith (eds), Lough Neagh. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 451–471.Google Scholar
  32. Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & P. R. Cubby, 1994. Status of Rare Fish, Project Record Volume 1. Unpublished report. National Rivers Authority, Bristol: 244 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Winfield, I. J., C. E. Adams & J. M. Fletcher, 1996. Recent introductions of the ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) to three United Kingdom lakes containing Coregonus species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33: 459–466.Google Scholar
  34. Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & J. B. James, 2003. Gwyniad Translocation Project: Phase One—a Condition Assessment of the Potential Donor Population in Llyn Tegid. CCW Contract Science Report No. 597. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor: 52 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & J. B. James, 2006. SCM of Fish in Standing Waters (Phase II). Unpublished report. Scottish Natural Heritage, Clydebank: 40 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Winfield, I. J., J. M. Fletcher, J. B. James, C. Duigan, C. W. Bean & N. C. Durie, 2007. Long-term case histories of ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) introductions to four U.K. lakes containing native vendace (Coregonus albula) or whitefish (C. lavaretus) populations. Advances in Limnology 60: 301–309.Google Scholar
  37. Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & J. B. James, 2008a. SCM of Fish in Standing Waters 2007/2008 (Phase I). Unpublished report. Scottish Natural Heritage, Clydebank: 36 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Winfield, I. J., J. M. Fletcher & J. B. James, 2008b. The Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) populations of Windermere. U.K.: population trends associated with eutrophication, climate change and increased abundance of roach (Rutilus rutilus). Environmental Biology of Fishes 83: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winfield, I. J., J. B. James & J. M. Fletcher, 2008c. Northern pike (Esox lucius) in a warming lake: changes in population size and individual condition in relation to prey abundance. Hydrobiologia 601: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. J. Winfield
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. M. Fletcher
    • 1
  • J. B. James
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & HydrologyLancaster Environment CentreLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations