, Volume 654, Issue 1, pp 67–82

Recovery of zooplankton diversity in a restored Mediterranean temporary marsh in Doñana National Park (SW Spain)

  • Anna Badosa
  • Dagmar Frisch
  • Arantza Arechederra
  • Laura Serrano
  • Andy J. Green
Primary research paper


Over 30 years after drainage for agriculture, a 2700 ha temporary marshland was recently restored in Doñana National Park. We describe the recovery of zooplankton communities (copepods, cladocerans and rotifers) in 47 new temporary ponds excavated as part of the restoration project during the first two hydroperiods (April 2006 and 2007), and compare them to those of eight reference sites in the surrounding marshland. Major changes in the species composition and abundance occurred in new ponds between years. While rotifers and cyclopoid copepods dominated in terms of number of individuals in 2006, calanoid copepods and cladocerans were the most abundant groups in 2007. Rotifer species richness was significantly lower in 2007, but there was an increase in Simpson and β-diversity in 2007 owing largely to a dramatic decline in the abundance of Hexarthra cf. fennica (rare in reference sites) from 93% of all rotifer individuals in new ponds in 2006 to only 32% in 2007. In contrast, species richness of copepods and cladocerans was significantly higher in new ponds in 2007, but there were no changes in Simpson diversity. β-Diversity of cladocerans was also significantly higher in 2007. In 2006, the species richness of cladocera and copepods was significantly lower in new ponds than in reference sites, but by 2007 there were no differences in richness or Simpson diversity. Overall, 7 copepod, 13 cladoceran and 26 rotifer taxa were recorded in new ponds, including 80% of taxa recorded in reference sites. These results indicate that zooplankton communities can be rapidly restored in Mediterranean temporary wetlands, at least when large source populations in the surrounding area reduce dispersal limitation. They also illustrate the importance of comparing different metrics of richness and diversity in studies of zooplankton restoration.


Wetland restoration Mediterranean temporary ponds Zooplankton Species richness α- and β-diversity Colonization 


  1. Alonso, M., 1996. Crustacea, Branchiopoda. In Ramos, M. A., et al. (eds), Fauna Iberica, Vol. 7. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid: 486 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Arechederra, A., D. León, K. Fahd, J. Toja & L. Serrano, 2006. The micro-crustaceans and rotifers of Doñana. In García-Novo, F. & C. Marín (eds), Doñana, Water and Biosphere. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid: 342–343.Google Scholar
  3. Arnott, S. E., J. J. Magnuson & N. D. Yan, 1998. Crustacean zooplankton species richness: single- and multiple-year estimates. In: Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. Blackwell Science Ltd., Singapore.Google Scholar
  4. Binks, J. A., S. E. Arnott & W. G. Sprules, 2005. Local factors and colonist dispersal influence crustacean zooplankton recovery from cultural acidification. Ecological Applications 15: 2025–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brochet, A. L., M. Gauthier-Clerc, M. Guillemain, H. Fritz, A. Waterkeyn, A. Baltanás & A. J. Green, 2010. Field evidence of dispersal of branchiopods, ostracods and bryozoans by teal (Anas crecca) in the Camargue (southern France). Hydrobiologia 637: 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, T. M., R. A. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, J. Gerlach, M. Hoffmann, J. F. Lamoreux, C. G. Mittermeier, J. D. Pilgrim & A. S. L. Rodrigues, 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 58–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burks, R. L., G. Mulderij, E. Gross, I. Jones, L. Jacobsen, E. Jeppesen & E. Van Donk, 2006. Center stage: the crutial role of macrophytes in regulating trophic interactions in shallow lake wetlands. In Bobbink, R., B. Beltman, J. T. A. Verhoeven & D. F. Whigham (eds), Wetlands: Functioning, Biodiversity, Conservation and Restoration. Ecological Studies, Vol. 191. Springer, Berlin: 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, S. R. & D. M. Lodge, 1986. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquatic Botany 26: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chao, A., R. L. Chazdon, R. K. Colwell & T. J. Shen, 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters 8: 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colwell, R. K., 2005. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.0. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
  11. Conde-Porcuna, J. M., E. Ramos-Rodriguez & C. Perez-Martinez, 2002. Correlations between nutrient concentrations and zooplankton populations in a mesotrophic reservoir. Freshwater Biology 47: 1463–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke, G. D., E. G. Welch, S. Peterson & S. A. Nichols, 2005. Restoration and Management of Lakes and Reservoirs. CRC Press, Boca Raton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cottenie, K., N. Nuytten, E. Michels & L. De Meester, 2001. Zooplankton community structure and environmental conditions in a set of interconnected ponds. Hydrobiologia 442: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Meester, L., S. Declerck, R. Stoks, G. Louette, F. van De Meutter, T. De Bie, E. Michels & L. Brendonck, 2005. Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 715–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Stefano, L., 2004. Freshwater and Tourism in the Mediterranean. WWF Mediterranean Programme. (http://assets.panda.org/downloads/medpotourismreportfinal_ofnc.pdf).
  16. Declerck, S., J. Vandekerkhove, L. Johansson, K. Muylaert, J. M. Conde-Porcuna, K. Van, C. der Gucht, T. Perez-Martinez, K. Lauridsen, G. Schwenk, W. Zwart, J. Rommens, E. Lopez-Ramos, W. Jeppesen, L. Vyverman, L. Brendonck & De Meester, 2005. Multi-group biodiversity in shallow lakes along gradients of phosphorus and water plant cover. Ecology 86: 1905–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Declerck, S., M. Vanderstukken, A. Pals, K. Muylaert & L. de Meester, 2007. Plankton biodiversity along a gradient of productivity and its mediation by macrophytes. Ecology 88: 2199–2210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodson, S. I. & R. A. Lillie, 2001. Zooplankton communities of restored depressional wetlands in Wisconsin, USA. Wetlands 21: 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodson, S. I., W. R. Everhart, A. K. Jandl & S. J. Krauskopf, 2007. Effect of watershed land use and lake age on zooplankton species richness. Hydrobiologia 579: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald, D. B., R. D. Vinebrooke, R. S. Anderson, J. Syrgiannis & M. D. Graham, 2001. Recovery of zooplankton assemblages in mountain lakes from the effects of introduced sport fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1822–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dussart, B. H., 1967. Les copépodes des eaux continentales d’Europe occidentale. Tome I: Calanoïds et Harpacticoïdes. N. Boubée & Cie, Paris: 500 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Dussart, B. H., 1969. Les copépodes des eaux continentales d′Europe occidentale. Tome II: Cyclopoïdes et Biologie. N. Boubée & Cie, Paris: 292 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Einsle, U., 1993. Crustacea: Copepoda: Calanoida und Cyclopoida. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Enggass, P. M., 1968. Land reclamation and resettlement in Guadalquivir Delta – Las Marismas. Economic Geography 44: 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Espinar, J. L. & L. Serrano, 2009. A quantitative hydrogeomorphic approach to the classification of temporary wetlands in the Doñana Nacional Park (SW Spain). Aquatic Ecology 43: 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fahd, K., L. Serrano & J. Toja, 2000. Crustacean and rotifer composition of temporary ponds in the Doñana National Park (SW Spain) during floods. Hydrobiologia 436: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fahd, K., M. Florencio, C. Keller & L. Serrano, 2007. The effect of the sampling scale on zooplankton community assessment and its implications for the conservation of temporary ponds in south-west Spain. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 17: 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fahd, K., A. Arechederra, M. Florencio, D. León & L. Serrano, 2009. Copepods and branchiopods of temporary ponds in the Doñana Natural Area (SW Spain): a four-decade record (1964–2007). Hydrobiologia 643: 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frisch, D. & A. J. Green, 2007. Copepods come in first: rapid colonization of mew temporary ponds. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, Archiv für Hydrobiologie 168: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frisch, D., E. Moreno-Ostos & A. J. Green, 2006. Species richness and distribution of copepods and cladocerans and their relation to hydroperiod and other environmental variables in Doñana, south-west Spain. Hydrobiologia 556: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frisch, D., A. J. Green & J. Figuerola, 2007. High dispersal capacity of a broad spectrum of aquatic invertebrates via waterbirds. Aquatic Sciences 69: 568–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frisch, D., A. Arechederra & A. J. Green, 2009. Recolonisation potential of zooplankton propagule banks in natural and agriculturally modified section of a semiarid temporary stream (Doñana, Southwest Spain). Hydrobiologia 624: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frost, T. M., J. M. Fischer, J. L. Klug, S. E. Arnott & P. K. Montz, 2006. Trajectories of zooplankton recovery in the little rock lake whole-lake acidification experiment. Ecological Applications 16: 353–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fussmann, G., 1996. The importance of crustacean zooplankton in structuring rotifer and phytoplankton communities: An enclosure study. Journal of Plankton Research 18: 1897–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. García-Berthou, E., D. Boix & M. Clavero, 2007. Non-indigenous animal species naturalized in Iberian inland waters. In Gherardi, F. (ed.). Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution and Threats. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  36. García-Novo, F. & C. Marín, (eds) 2006. Doñana, Water and Biosphere. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.Google Scholar
  37. Gray, D. K. & S. E. Arnott, 2009. Recovery of acid damaged zooplankton communities: measurement, extent, and limiting factors. Environmental Reviews 17: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Green, A. J., M. El Hamzaoui, M. A. El Agbani & J. Franchimont, 2002. The conservation status of Moroccan wetlands with particular reference to waterbirds and to changes since 1978. Biological Conservation 104: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grillas, P., P. Gauthier, N. Yavercovski & C. Perennou, 2004. Mediterranean Temporary Pools. Issues Relating to Conservation, Functioning and Management. Station biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles.Google Scholar
  40. Herzig, A. & W. Koste, 1989. The development of Hexarthra spp. in a shallow alkaline lake. Hydrobiologia 186: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins, M., 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302: 1175–1177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jenkins, D. G. & A. L. Buikema Jr. 1998. Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function. Ecological Monographs 68: 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, M. Meerhoff, T. L. Lauridsen & J. P. Jensen, 2007. Shallow lake restoration by nutrient loading reduction – some recent findings and challenges ahead. Hydrobiologia 584: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kloskowski, J., A. J. Green, M. Polak, J. Bustamante & J. Krogulec, 2009. Complementary use of natural and artificial wetlands by waterbirds wintering in Doñana, south-west Spain. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 815–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knapp, R. A. & O. Sarnelle, 2008. Recovery after local extinction: factors affecting re-establishment of alpine lake zooplankton. Ecological Applications 18: 1850–1859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kohout, L. & J. Fott, 2006. Restoration of zooplankton in a small acidified mountain lake (Plesne Lake, Bohemian Forest) by reintroduction of key species. Biologia 61: S477–S483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas begründet von Max Voigt (in German). Mononongonta. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. Legendre, P. & E. D. Gallagher, 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Legendre, P., D. Borcard & P. R. Peres-Neto, 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecological Monographs 75: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lepš, J. & P. Šmilauer, 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Louette, G. & L. De Meester, 2005. High dispersal capacity of cladoceran zooplankton in newly founded communities. Ecology 86: 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Louette, G., L. De Meester & S. Declerck, 2008. Assembly of zooplankton communities in newly created ponds. Freshwater Biology 53: 2309–2320.Google Scholar
  53. Moss, B., D. Hering, A. J. Green, A. Aidoud, E. Becares, M. Beklioglu, H. Bennion, D. Boix, L. Carvalho, B. Clement, T. Davidson, S. Declerck, M. Dobson, E. van Donk, B. Dudley, H. Feuchtmayr, N. Friberg, G. Grenouillet, H. Hillebrand, A. Hobaek, K. Irvine, E. Jeppesen, R. Johnson, I. Jones, M. Kernan, T. L. Lauridsen, M. Manca, M. Meerhoff, J. Olafsson, S. Ormerod, E. Papastergiadou, W. E. Penning, R. Ptacnik, X. Quintana, L. Sandin, M. Seferlis, G. Simpson, C. Triga, A. M. Verschoor, P. F. M. Verdonschot & G. A. Weyhenmeyer, 2009. Climate change and the future of freshwater biodiversity in Europe: a primer for policy-makers. Freshwater Reviews 2: 103–130.Google Scholar
  54. Oertli, B., R. Céréghino, A. Hull & R. Miracle, 2009. Pond conservation: from science to practice. Hydrobiologia 634: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rendón, M. A., A. J. Green, E. Aguilera & P. Almaraza, 2008. Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south-west Spain. Biological Conservation 141: 1371–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodriguez-Perez, H., M. Florencio, C. Gomez-Rodriguez, A. J. Green, C. Diaz-Paniagua & L. Serrano, 2009. Monitoring the invasion of the aquatic bug Trichocorixa verticalis verticalis (Hemiptera: Corixidae) in the wetlands of Doñana National Park (SW Spain). Hydrobiologia 634: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Romo, S., M. R. Miracle, M. J. Villena, J. Rueda, C. Ferriol & E. Vicente, 2004. Mesocosm experiments on nutrient and fish effects on shallow lake food webs in a Mediterranean climate. Freshwater Biology 49: 1593–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Santamaría, L., A. J. Green, R. Diaz-Delgado, M. A. Bravo & E. M. Castellanos, 2006. Caracoles, a new laboratory for science and wetland restoration. In García-Novo, F. & C. Marín (eds), Doñana, Water and Biosphere. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid: 325–327.Google Scholar
  59. Schell, J. M., C. J. Santos-Flores, P. E. Allen, B. M. Hunker, S. Kloehn, A. Michelson, R. A. Lillie & S. I. Dodson, 2001. Physical–chemical influences on vernal zooplankton community structure in small lakes and wetlands of Wisconsin, USA. Hydrobiologia 445: 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Serrano, L., M. Reina, G. Martín, I. Reyes, A. Arechederra, D. León & J. Toja, 2006. The aquatic systems of Doñana (SW Spain): watersheds and frontiers. Limnetica 25: 11–32.Google Scholar
  61. Starkweather, P. L., 2005. Susceptibility of ephemeral pool Hexarthra to predation by the fairy shrimp Branchinecta mackini: can predation drive local extinction? Hydrobiologia 546: 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taggart, M. A., J. Figuerola, A. J. Green, R. Mateo, C. Deacon, D. Osborn & A. A. Meharg, 2006. After the Aznalcollar mine spill: Arsenic, zinc, selenium, lead and copper levels in the livers and bones of five waterfowl species. Environmental Research 100: 349–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vanschoenwinkel, B., S. Gielen, H. Vandewaerde, M. Seaman & L. Brendonck, 2008. Relative importance of different dispersal vectors for small aquatic invertebrates in a rock pool metacommunity. Ecography 31: 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, P., M. Whitfield & J. Biggs, 2008. How can we make new ponds biodiverse? A case study monitored over 7 years. Hydrobiologia 597: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yan, N. D., R. Girard, J. H. Heneberry, W. B. Keller, J. M. Gunn & P. J. Dillon, 2004. Recovery of copepod, but not cladoceran, zooplankton from severe and chronic effects of multiple stressors. Ecology Letters 7: 452–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Badosa
    • 1
  • Dagmar Frisch
    • 1
  • Arantza Arechederra
    • 1
  • Laura Serrano
    • 2
  • Andy J. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Wetland EcologyDoñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC)SevillaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Plant Biology and EcologyUniversity of SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations