, Volume 643, Issue 1, pp 51–54 | Cite as

Food quantity shapes life history and survival strategies in Daphnia magna (Cladocera)

  • Barbara Pietrzak
  • Małgorzata Grzesiuk
  • Anna Bednarska


Life history and demographic responses to different food regimes were investigated in three clones of Daphnia magna. Green alga Scenedesmus obliquus served as food source and was given in five amounts, which covered the range from near threshold to excess food concentrations, from 0.05 through 0.15, 0.5, 1.5 to 4.5 mg C l−1. The animals were kept under given food regime from first instar until their natural death. Food regime had a significant effect on Daphnia survival, which was shortest under the highest food regime. However, the response in expected reproduction of an individual differed between clones, with one benefiting more from higher food supply than the others. Life history trade-offs were seen as shortened lifespan versus higher investments in early reproduction.


Lifespan Life history Food regime Daphnia 



We want to thank Joanna Pijanowska and Cristian Gudasz, and the two anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments, which helped to improve the manuscript. This study was supported by Polish Committee for Scientific Research grant N304 005 32/0647.


  1. Arnold, D. E., 1971. Ingestion, assimilation, survival, and reproduction by Daphnia pulex fed seven species of blue-green algae. Limnology & Oceanography 16: 906–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dudycha, J. L., 2001. The senescence of Daphnia from risky and safe habitats. Ecology Letters 4: 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dudycha, J. L., 2003. A multi-environment comparison of senescence in sister species of Daphnia. Oecologia 135: 555–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Giebelhausen, B. & W. Lampert, 2001. Temperature reaction norms of Daphnia magna: the effect of food concentration. Freshwater Biology 46: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glazier, D. S. & P. Calow, 1992. Energy allocation rules in Daphnia magna: clonal and age differences in the effects of food limitation. Oecologia 90: 540–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gliwicz, Z. M., 1990. Food thresholds and body size in cladocerans. Nature 343: 638–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holliday, R., 1989. Food, reproduction and longevity: is the extended lifespan of calorie-restricted animals an evolutionary adaptation? BioEssays 10: 125–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lampert, W., 1978. A field study on the dependence of the fecundity of Daphnia spec. on food concentration. Oecologia 36: 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lynch, M., 1989. The life history consequences of resource depression in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 70: 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynch, M. & R. Ennis, 1983. Resource availability, maternal effects, and longevity. Experimental Gerontology 18: 147–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Martínez-Jerónimo, F., R. Villasenor, G. Rios & F. Espinosa, 1994. Effect of food type and concentration on the survival, longevity, and reproduction of Daphnia magna. Hydrobiologia 287: 207–214.Google Scholar
  12. Masoro, E. J., 2005. Overview of caloric restriction and ageing. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126(9 (Spec. Iss.)): 913–922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Masoro, E. J. & S. N. Austad, 1996. The evolution of the antiaging action of dietary restriction: a hypothesis. Journals of Gerontology – Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 51: B387–B391.Google Scholar
  14. McCauley, E., W. W. Murdoch & R. M. Nisbet, 1990. Growth, reproduction, and mortality of Daphnia pulex Leydig: life at low food. Functional Ecology 4: 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muñoz-Mejía, G. & F. Martínez-Jerónimo, 2007. Impact of algae and their concentrations on the reproduction and longevity of cladocerans. Annales de Limnologie 43: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orcutt Jr., J. D. & K. G. Porter, 1984. The synergistic effects of temperature and food concentration of life history parameters of Daphnia. Oecologia 63: 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter, K. G., J. D. Orcutt Jr & J. Gerritsen, 1983. Functional response and fitness in a generalist filter feeder Daphnia magna (Cladocera: Crustacea). Ecology 64: 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rice, W. R., 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shanley, D. P. & T. B. L. Kirkwood, 2000. Calorie restriction and aging: a life-history analysis. Evolution 54: 740–750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sinclair, D. A., 2005. Toward a unified theory of caloric restriction and longevity regulation. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126(9 (Spec. Iss.)): 987–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stearns, S. C., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  22. Vijverberg, 1976. The effect of food quantity and quality on the growth, birth-rate and longevity of Daphnia hyalina Leydig. Hydrobiologia 51: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weider, L. J., 1993. Niche breadth and life history variation in a hybrid Daphnia complex. Ecology 74: 935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zehnder, A. & P. R. Gorham, 1960. Factors influencing the growth of Microcytis aeruginosa Kütz. emend. Elenkin. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 6: 645–660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Pietrzak
    • 1
  • Małgorzata Grzesiuk
    • 1
  • Anna Bednarska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations