Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 647, Issue 1, pp 63–70 | Cite as

Changes in the macrobenthic community structure following the introduction of the invasive algae Didymosphenia geminata in the Matapedia River (Québec, Canada)

  • Carole-Anne GillisEmail author
  • Mireille Chalifour
ECOSYSTEM STUDIES OF THE ST LAWRENCE RIVER

Abstract

In July 2006, blooms of Didymosphenia geminata (didymo) were, for the first time, officially observed and identified in the Matapedia River, an Atlantic salmon river of the Gaspesie peninsula (Québec, Canada). This invasive diatom can form thick and extensive benthic layers in stable flow and oligotrophic rivers. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of didymo on the macrobenthic community structure of the Matapedia River. Macrobenthic samples were obtained in 2006, upstream of the blooms and, at the same sampling sites a year later, when they were affected by didymo. The Causapscal River remained free of didymo blooms for both years; therefore, this tributary is considered as a control site. Results show a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the community distribution before and after didymo presence in two of the three sites. Significant data show an increase Chironomidae proportions in all the sites (P = 0.011). Significantly higher benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) densities were also observed in 2007 (P < 0.001). Simpson’s Evenness Index and total family richness was not significantly different when comparing pre- and post-incursion data (P = 0.90 and P = 0.83, respectively). Nevertheless, it is concluded that the presence of didymo has an effect on the base of the aquatic food web of the Matapedia River. This study is the first to assess the effect of this invasive alga on BMIs in Eastern Canada.

Keywords

Didymosphenia geminata Freshwater invertebrates Community structure EPT Invasive species Stalked diatom Periphyton 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the Matapedia River Watershed Council team for their effectiveness in assessing the presence of D. geminata in 2006. Thanks are due to Kayla Giroux, Alain Caron, Robert Chabot, Normand Bergeron, Nicolas Galmiche, Sara Frey and Sarah Brin Clément for their insights and comments. Université du Québec à Rimouski, and the Matapedia River Watershed Council provided facilities and equipments.

References

  1. Biggs, J. F. B., 2000. New Zealand Periphyton Guideline: Detecting, Monitoring and Management Enrichment of streams. Prepared for Ministry for the Environment: 124 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Bothwell, M. L. & S. A. Spaulding, 2008. Synopsis. The 2007 International Workshop on Didymosphenia geminata. In Bothwell, M. L. & S. A. Spaulding (eds), Proceedings of the 2007 International Workshop on Didymosphenia geminata. Canadian Technical Report on Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2795: xiii–xxi.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, M. L., 2005. Organism Impact Assessment (OIA) for Potential Impacts of Didymosphenia geminata. All Oceans Ecology, Melbourne: 92 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Jones, C., K. M. Somers, B. Craig & T. B. Reynoldson, 2005. Ontario Benthos Biomonitoring Network Protocol Manual. Ontario Ministry of Environment, Ontario: 111 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Kawecka, B. & J. Sanecki, 2003. Didymosphenia geminata in running waters of southern Poland – symptoms of change in water quality? Hydrobiologia 495: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keeley, E. R. & J. W. A. Grant, 1997. Allometry of diet selectivity in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1894–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kilroy, C., 2004. A New Alien Diatom, Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) Schmidt: Its Biology, Distribution, Effects and Potential Risks for New Zealand Fresh Waters. Environment Southland, NIWA Client Report: 40 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Kilroy, C., B. J. F. Biggs, N. Blair, P. Lambert, B. Jarvie, K. L. Dey, K. Robinson & D. Smale, 2006. Ecological Studies on Didymosphenia geminata. NIWA Client Report: 79 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Kirkwood, A., T. Shea, J. J. Leland & E. McCauley, 2007. Didymosphenia geminata in two Alberta headwater rivers: an emerging invasive species that challenges conventional views on algal bloom development. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 1703–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Larned, S., D. Arscott, N. Blair, B. Jarvie, D. Jellyman, K. Lister, J. Nagels, M. Schallenberg, S. Sutherland, K. Vopel & B. Wilcock, 2007. Ecological Studies of Didymosphenia geminata in New Zealand: Habitat and Ecosystem Effects 2006-2007. NIWA Client Report CHC2007-070, NIWA Project: MAF07507.Google Scholar
  11. Larson, A. M., 2007. Interim Report: Effects of Nuisance Blooms of Didymosphenia geminata on Benthic Community Composition in Rapid Creek. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources: 30 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Mookerji, N., Z. Weng & A. Mazumder, 2004. Food partitioning between coexisting Atlantic salmon and brook trout in the Sainte-Marguerite River ecosystem, Québec, The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Journal of Fish Biology 64: 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1975. The diatoms of United States, Vol. 2, Part 1. Monograph 13. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Pelletier, L. & J. Moisan, 2006. Surveillance biologique des cours d’eau peu profonds à l’aide des macroinvertébrés benthiques. Manuel de terrain et de laboratoire (Version 1.0), Approche monohabitat, Ministère du Développement Durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs: 63 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Rice, S. P., T. Buffin-Bélanger, J. Lancaster & I. Reid, 2008. Movements of a macroinvertebrate (Potamophylax latipennis) across a gravel-bed substrate: effects of local hydraulics and micro-topography under increasing discharge. In Habersack, H., H. Piegay & M. Rinaldi (eds), Gravel-Bed Rivers VI: From Process Understanding to River Restoration, Chapter 24. Elsevier: 637–659Google Scholar
  16. Shearer, K. A., J. Hay & J. W. Hayes, 2007. Invertebrate Drift and Trout Growth Potential in Didymo (Didymosphenia geminata) Affected Reaches of the Mararoa and Oreti Rivers: April & August 2006. Prepared for MAF Biosecurity New Zealand. Cawthron Report No. 1214: 73 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Shelby, E. L., 2006. An Assessment and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities Associated with the Appearance of Didymosphenia geminata in the White River Below Bull Shoals Dam. Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality: 42 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Sherbot, D. M. J. & M. L. Bothwell, 1993. Didymosphenia geminata (Gomphonemaceae). A Preview of the Ecology of D. geminata and the Physicochemical Characteristics of Endemic Catchments on Vancouver Island. NHRI Contribution No. 93005. National Hydrology Research Institute, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  19. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural Resources (SDDENR), 2005. Standard Operating Procedures for Field Samplers, Volume II, Biological and Habitat Sampling. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Water Resources Assistance Program.Google Scholar
  20. Spaulding, S. & L. Elwell, 2007. Increase in Nuisance Blooms and Geographic Expansion of the Freshwater Diatom Didymosphenia geminata. Environmental Protection Agency and the Federation of Fly Fishers Montana: 33 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Whoriskey, F., 2008. Of didymo, Atlantic salmon and the management of fear. In Bothwell, M. L. & S. A. Spaulding (eds), Proceedings of the 2007 International Workshop on Didymosphenia geminata. Canadian Technical Report on Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2795: xi–xii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université du Québec à RimouskiRimouskiCanada
  2. 2.Matapedia River Watershed CouncilCausapscalCanada

Personalised recommendations