Hydrobiologia

, 638:21

Foraging patterns and kleptoparasitism among three sympatric cormorants (Phalacrocorax spp.) from the Delhi region, North India

Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Cormorants, described as ‘foot-propelled pursuit divers’, constitute an important component of aquatic food webs and exhibit unique foraging behaviour patterns, which can be properly understood through a comparative study. Since, after a foraging dive they surface to ingest the prey, the intensity of kleptoparasitic attacks on the surface can have a major impact upon the net energetic gain for each individual. Inspite of the fact that cormorants and their habitats are severely threatened in India, their foraging behaviour has not been adequately studied. Such considerations prompted us to undertake field studies on three sympatric cormorants (Phalacrocorax spp.) at 60 different sites in the Delhi region of North India, during 2004–2007. By means of video photography, some key foraging parameters including group size, prey size and patterns of kleptoparasitic attacks were quantified. Along a loose body size gradient, we observed significant differences among the three species with respect to not only their preference for wetland size but also prey size. The frequency of a kleptoparasitic attacks depended upon the group size and foraging behaviour of each species. It was observed that several foraging bouts were abruptly terminated due to human disturbances, mostly at sites lying outside the protected areas. This observation points towards the need to conserve small waterbodies in the countryside, currently threatened by pollution and urbanization, for the benefit of a variety of waterbirds including cormorants.

Keywords

Phalacrocorax Foraging behaviour Body size Prey size Group size Kleptoparasitism India 

References

  1. Ali, S. & S. D. Ripley, 1987. Compact Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, J., 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BirdLife International, 2001. Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book. BirdLife International, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, C. R., 1988. Enhanced foraging efficiency through information centers: a benefit of coloniality in cliff swallows. Ecology 69: 602–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, P. J. & D. R. Jones, 1997. The physiology of diving of birds and mammals. Physiological Review 77: 837–899.Google Scholar
  6. Dorfman, E. J. & M. J. Kingsford, 2001. Environmental determinants of distribution and foraging behaviour of cormorants (Phalacrocorax spp.) in temperate estuarine habitats. Marine Biology 138: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fonteneau, F., J. Paillissonn & L. Marion, 2009. Relationships between bird morphology and prey selection in two sympatric Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo subspecies during winter. Ibis 151: 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganguli, U., 1975. A Guide to the Birds of the Delhi Area. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  9. Google Earth, 2009. Google Earth Software. [Downloaded on 20 March 2009. http://earth.google.com].
  10. Grémillet, D., C. Chauvin, R. P. Wilson, Y. Le Maho & S. Wanless, 2005. Unusual feather structure allows partial plumage wettability in diving Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo. Journal of Avian Biology 36: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphries, P., G. A. Hyndes & I. C. Potter, 1992. Comparisons between the diets of distant Taxa (Teleost and Cormorant) in an Australian Estuary. Estuaries 15: 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam, M. Z. & A. R. Rahmani, 2004. Important Birds Area in India: Priority Sites for Conservation. Bombay Natural History Society and BirdLife International, Mumbai and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Kalam, A. & A. J. Urfi, 2008. Foraging behaviour and prey size of the painted stork. Journal of Zoology (London) 274: 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muir, G. B. F., 1916. Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and fishing eagle (Haliaëtus leucoryphus). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 24: 598.Google Scholar
  15. Mukherjee, A. & C. K. Borad, 2001. Effects of waterbirds on water quality. Hydrobiologia 464: 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orta, J., 1992. Family Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants). In del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott & J. Sargatal (eds), Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks Lynx Edicions. Barcelona, Spain: 326–353.Google Scholar
  17. Punta, G. E., J. R. C. Saravia & P. M. Yorio, 1993. The diet and foraging behaviour of two Patagonian Cormorants. Marine Ornithology 21: 27–36.Google Scholar
  18. Rodgers, A. W. & H. S. Panwar, 1988. Planning a protected area network in India 1. The Report, Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, R. K., 1976. Notes on the behavior of captive Great Cormorants. Wilson Bulletin 88: 143–145.Google Scholar
  20. Urfi, A. J., 1995. Wetlands of ornithological significance in the Delhi region. Oriental Bird Club Bulletin 22: 38–41.Google Scholar
  21. Urfi, A. J., 2003. The birds of Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, Delhi, India. Forktail 19: 39–50.Google Scholar
  22. Urfi, A. J. & A. Kalam, 2006. Sexual size dimorphism and mating pattern in the painted stork (Mycteria leucocephala). Waterbirds 29: 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Urfi, A. J. & M. Mahendiran, 2005. A review of cormorants in India and a note on the cormorant colonies in the heronries of the Delhi Zoo. Cormorant Research Group Bulletin 6: 39–43.Google Scholar
  24. Voslamber, B., M. Platteeuw & M. R. Van Eerden, 1995. Solitary foraging in sand pits by breeding cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis: does specialised knowledge about fishing sites and fish behaviour pay off? Ardea 83: 213–222.Google Scholar
  25. Wanless, S. & M. P. Harris, 1991. Diving patterns of full-grown and juvenile Rock Shags. Condor 93: 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiens, J. A. & J. T. Rotenberry, 1980. Patterns of morphology and ecology in grassland and shrubsteppe bird population. Ecological Monograph 50: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations