, Volume 602, Issue 1, pp 87–98

Impact of glass eel fishery on by-catch fish species: a quantitative assessment



The present study evaluated the effect of the glass eel fishery on by-catch ichthyofauna in the Ebro River delta by investigating the primary responsible factors of discard mortality, in order to assess the adequacy of fishing and sorting procedures, and assess the ecological impact of this traditional activity. Results revealed that glass eel fishery had a negative impact on by-catch ichthyofauna mainly composed of mugilid fry and small-size estuarine species. Data showed that between 10 and 69% of incidental species died as a consequence of glass eel capture and sorting procedures. Differences in by-catch fish mortality rates depended on the glass eel sorting time, the total weight of catch, the discard ratio, by-catch fish size, and by-catch fish species composition. The total weight of the catch and the discard ratio were two of the main parameters affecting discarded fish mortality, since both had a direct effect on the period of time required for glass eel sorting during which by-catch fish were exposed to air and suffered from very aggressive sorting procedures that caused severe external and internal injuries. By-catch fish measuring less than 40 mm LT were more susceptible to glass eel fishery procedures than those larger (>60 mm LT), independent of the species considered or their stage of development. This fishery, similar to other ones, should strive to minimization the amount of discards and the mortality of discarded fish, by improving the selectivity of the fish trap and developing new sorting and selection procedures.


Glass eel fishery By-catch Discard mortality Ebro River delta Anguilla anguilla Grey mullet fry 


  1. Alverson, D. L., M. H. Freeberg, J. G. Pope & S. A. Murawski, 1994. A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 339. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  2. American Fisheries Society, 1992. Investigation and valuation of fish kills. AFS Special Publication 24, AS. Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  3. Cardona, L., P. Royo & X. Torras, 2001. Effects of leaping grey mullet Liza saliens (Osteichthyes, Mugilidae) in the macrophyte beds of oligohaline Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Hydrobiologia 462: 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castelnaud, G., 2002. Caractéristiques de la pêcherie civellière du golfe de Gascogne. Contrat européen n° 99/023. IFREMER, CEMAGREF, Groupement de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  5. Castelnaud, G., D. Guerault, Y. Desaunay & P. Elie, 1994. Yield and abundance of the glass eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) at the beginning of the nineties. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 335: 263–287.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, V., S. Guenette, J. J. Heymans, C. J. Esaters, R. Watson, D. Zeller & D. Pauly, 2003. Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes. Fish and Fisheries 4: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, M. W., 2002. Key principles for understanding fish bycatch discard mortality. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1834–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M. W., 2005. Behaviour impairment in captured and released sablefish: ecological consequences and possible substitute measures for delayed discard mortality. Journal of Fish Biology 66: 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, M. W., B. L. Olla & C. B. Schreck, 2001. Stress induced by hooking, net towing, elevated sea water temperature and air in sablefish: lack of concordance between mortality and physiological measures of stress. Journal of Fish Biology 58: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, M. W. & S. J. Parker, 2004. Fish size and exposure to air: potential effects on behavioural impairment and mortality rates in discarded fish. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dekker, W., 2002. Slipping through our hands, Population dynamics of the European eel. Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Dekker, W., 2003. On the distribution of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and its fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dekker, W. (ed.), 2005. Report of the Workshop on National Data Collection for the European Eel, 6–8 September 2005, Sånga Säby, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. Demestre, M., A. Roig, A. de Sostoa & F. J. de Sostoa, 1977. Contribution to the study of the continental ichthyofauna of the Ebre Delta (NE of Iberian Peninsula). Treballs de l’Institut Català d’Història Natural 8: 145–226.Google Scholar
  15. Doadrio, I. (ed.), 2002. Atlas y libro rojo de los peces continentales de España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.Google Scholar
  16. EIFAC/ICES, 2003. Report of the Thirteenth Session of the Joint EIFAC/ICES Working Group on Eels. EIFAC Occasional Paper. No. 36. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  17. Fernández, V. & A. Pech, 2000. L’angula al delta de l’Ebre. Revista Catalunya Rural i Agrària 65: 22–23.Google Scholar
  18. Gisbert, E., L. Cardona & F. Castelló, 1995. Evidence of competition between Mediterranean mullet fry. Journal of Fish Biology 47: 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guerault, D., Y. Desaunay, P. Bellois & P. Grellier, 1989. The Glass-eel Fishery in the Loire Estuary (1987): estimate of by-catches and effects on resources. EIFAC Working Party on Eel, Porto.Google Scholar
  20. MacDonald, D. S., J. G. Pope, N. Daanand & J. D. Reynolds, 1994. Impact of fishing on non-target species. Report to the Commission of the European Communities. MAFF Directorate of Fisheries, R.l.V.O and The University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  21. Moriarty, C. & W. Dekker (eds.), 1997. Management of the European Eel. Fisheries Bulletin (Dublin) 15: 1–110.Google Scholar
  22. Pauly, D., M. L. Palomares, R. Froese, P. Saa, M. Vakily, D. Preikshot & S. Wallace, 2001. Fishing down Canadian aquatic food webs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rincón, P. A., A. M. Correas, F. Morcillo, P. Risuen & J. Lobon-Cervia, 2002. Interaction between the introduced eastern mosquitofish and two autochthonous Spanish toothcarps. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 1560–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ringuet, S., F. Muto & C. Raymakers, 2002. Eel: their harvest and trade in Europe and Asia. Traffic Bulletin 19: 1–27.Google Scholar
  25. Robin, J. P., 1990. By-catch of juvenile flounder, Platichthys flesus L. 1758, in the glass-eel fishery of the Loire Estuary, France. Aquatic Living Resources 3: 75–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sangster, G. I., K. Lehman & M. Breen, 1996. Commercial fishing experiments to assess the survival of haddock and whiting after escape from four sizes of diamond mesh cod-ends. Fisheries Research 25: 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SigmaStat, 2004. User’s Manual SigmaStat, Statistical Software, Version 3.10 for Windows, Systat Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Co, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Wirth, T. & L. Bernatchez, 2003. Decline of North Atlantic eels: a fatal synergy? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unitat de Cultius Experimentals (UCE), Centre d’AqüiculturaInstitut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries (IRTA)Sant Carles de la RapitaSpain
  2. 2.Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries (IRTA)Sant Carles de la RapitaSpain

Personalised recommendations