Hydrobiologia

, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 3–8 | Cite as

An introduction to the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment (FADA) project

  • E. V. Balian
  • H. Segers
  • C. Lévêque
  • K. Martens
Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment

Abstract

The Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment (FADA) project aims at compiling an overview of genus- and species-level diversity of animals in the continental, aquatic ecosystems of the world. It is a collective effort of 163 experts, and presents 59 articles treating the diversity and endemism of different animal taxa, ranging from microscopic worms to mammals, at global and regional scales. Given their structural importance, an article on macrophytes is also added. Here, we give an overview of the project’s history, and outline the common framework of the various articles, as well as the conventions the experts agreed to adhere to in their treatises. Furthermore, we briefly introduce future prospects.

Keywords

Global biodiversity Endemism Metazoa Aquatic Non-marine Freshwater Review 

References

  1. Balian, E., H. Segers, C. Lévêque & K. Martens, 2007. Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment. http://www.Fada.Biodiversity.be (20 November 2007).
  2. Cox, C. B., 2001. The biogeographic regions reconsidered. Journal of Biogeography 28(4): 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Smet, W. H., 2002. A new record of Limnognathia maerski Kristensen & Funch, 2000 (Micrognathozoa) from the subantarctic Crozet Islands, with redescription of the trophi. Journal of Zoology, London 258: 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R. J. Naiman, A. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. J. Stiassny & C. A. Sullivan, 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Groombridge, B. & M. Jenkins, 1998. Freshwater Biodiversity: A Preliminary Global Assessment. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Groombridge, B. & M. Jenkins, 2000. Global Biodiversity. Earth’s Living Resources in the 21st Century. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. IUCN, 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (20 November 2007).
  8. Lévêque, C., E. V. Balian & K. Martens, 2005. An assessment of animal species diversity in continental water systems. Hydrobiologia 542: 39–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca & J. Kent, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Postel, S., & S. Carpenter, 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington D.C., U.S.A., 195–214.Google Scholar
  11. Postel, S. & B. Richter, 2003. Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Island Press, Washington D.C., U.S.A.Google Scholar
  12. Revenga, C. & Y. Kura, 2003. Status and Trends of Biodiversity of Inland Water Ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series 11.Google Scholar
  13. Segers, H., 2007. Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera) with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa 1564: 1–104.Google Scholar
  14. Wallace, A. R. 1876. The Geographical Distribution of Animals, 2 vol. Harper, New York, xxiii + 503, xi + 553 pp. (reprinted 1962, Hafner, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Balian
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Segers
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Lévêque
    • 3
  • K. Martens
    • 2
  1. 1.Belgian Biodiversity PlatformBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Freshwater BiologyRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural SciencesBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Antenne IRDMNHN-DMPAParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations