Hydrobiologia

, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 167–176 | Cite as

Global diversity of large branchiopods (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in freshwater

  • Luc Brendonck
  • D. Christopher Rogers
  • Jorgen Olesen
  • Stephen Weeks
  • Walter R. Hoeh
FRESHWATER ANIMAL DIVERSITY ASSESSMENT

Abstract

With about 500 known species worldwide, the large brachiopods are a relatively small group of primitive crustaceans. With few exceptions they live in temporary aquatic systems that are most abundant in arid and semi arid areas. As many regions remain unexplored and as especially the number of species in clam shrimps and tadpole shrimps is underestimated due to difficult identification, the species list will increase with future surveys. The Branchiopoda are monophyletic, but inter-ordinal relationships, as well as many evolutionary relationships at lower taxonomic levels are still unclear. Ongoing molecular studies will more accurately depict species diversity and phylogenetic patterns. With the exception of some anostracan families, most families are not restricted to the northern or southern hemisphere or specific zoogeographical regions. Large branchiopods are used for the assessment of the quality and function of temporary wetlands. Due to the reduction in number and quality of temporary wetlands, several species became endangered and are red listed by the IUCN.

Keywords

Large branchiopod diversity Anostraca Spinicaudata Laevicaudata Cyclestherida Notostraca Temporary pools 

Supplementary material

10750_2007_9119_MOESM1_ESM.doc (108 kb)
(DOC 107 kb)
10750_2007_9119_MOESM2_ESM.doc (48 kb)
(DOC 47 kb)

References

  1. Bauder, E. T., 1986. San Diego vernal pools: Recent and projected losses; their condition; and threats to their existence, 1979–1990. Report prepared for Endangered Plant Project, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Belk, D., 1982. Branchiopoda. In Parker, S. P. (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, 174–180.Google Scholar
  3. Belk, D., 1989. Identifying species in the conchostracan genus Eulimnadia by egg shell morphology. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9(1): 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belk, D., 1991. Anostracan mating behavior: A case of scramble-competition polygyny. In Bauer, R. T. & J. W. Martin (eds), Crustacean Sexual Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, 111–125.Google Scholar
  5. Belk, D., 1995. Uncovering the Laurasian roots of Eubranchipus. Hydrobiologia 298: 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, D., 1998. Global status and trends in ephemeral pool invertebrate conservation: implications for California fairy shrimp. In Witham, C. W., & E. T. Bauder (eds), 147–150.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, D. & J. Brtek, 1995. Checklist of the Anostraca. Hydrobiologia 298: 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belk, D. & J. Brtek, 1997. Supplement to ‘checklist of the Anostraca’. Hydrobiologia 359: 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boudrias, M. A. & J. Pires, 2002. Unusual sensory setae of the raptorial Branchinecta gigas (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Hydrobiologia 486: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braband, A. R., R. Hiesel & G. Scholtz, (2002). Phylogenetic relationships within the phyllopoda (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 229–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brendonck, L., 1989. A review of the phyllopods (Crustacea: Anostraca, Notostraca, Conchostraca) of the Belgian fauna. Verhandelingen van het symposium “Invertebraten van België” 1989: 129–135.Google Scholar
  12. Brendonck, L., 1993a. Feeding in the fairy shrimp Streptocephalus proboscideus (Frauenfeld) (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). I. Aspects of the feeding biology. Journal of Crustacean Biology 13: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brendonck, L., 1993b. Feeding in the fairy shrimp Streptocephalus proboscideus (Frauenfeld) (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). II. Influence of environmental conditions on feeding rate. Journal of Crustacean Biology 13: 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brendonck, L., 1995. An updated diagnosis of the branchiopodid genera (Branchiopoda: Anostraca, Branchipodidae) with reflections on the genus concept by Dubois (1988) and the importance of genital morphology in anostracan taxonomy. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 107(2): 149–186.Google Scholar
  15. Brendonck, L., 1996. Diapause, quiescence, hatching requirements: What we can learn from large freshwater branchiopods (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca, Notostraca, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 320: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brendonck, L. & D. Belk, 1997. On potentials and relevance of the use of copulatory structures in anostracan taxonomy. Hydrobiologia 359: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brendonck, L. & A. Coomans, 1994a. Egg morphology in African Streptocephalidae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Part 1: South of Zambezi and Kunene rivers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie/Suppl. 99 (Monographische Beiträge) 3: 313–334.Google Scholar
  18. Brendonck, L. & A. Coomans, 1994b. Egg morphology in African Streptocephalidae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Part 2: North of Zambezi and Kunene rivers, and Madagascar. Archiv für Hydrobiologie/Suppl. 99 (Monographische Beiträge) 3: 335–356.Google Scholar
  19. Brendonck, L. & G. Persoone, 1993. Biological/ecological characteristics of large freshwater branchiopods from endorheic regions and consequences for their use in cyst-based toxicity tests. In Soares, A. M. V. M. & P. Calow (eds), Progress in Standardization of Aquatic Toxicity Tests, Chapt. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 7–35.Google Scholar
  20. Brendonck, L. & W. D. Williams, 2000. Biodiversity in wetlands of dry regions (drylands). In Gopal, B., W. J. Junk & J. A. Davis (eds), Biodiversity in Wetlands: Assessment, Function and Conservation, Vol. 1. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 181–194.Google Scholar
  21. Brendonck, L., M. Hamer & A. Thiery, 1992. The occurrence of tetrahedral eggs in the Streptocephalidae (Crustacea:Branchiopoda:Anostraca) with descriptions of a new subgenus: Parastreptocephalus and a new species: Streptocephalus (Parastreptocephalus)zuluensis Brendonck and Hamer. Journal of Crustacean Biology 12: 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brendonck, L., B. J. Riddoch, V. Van de Weghe & T. Van Dooren, 1998. The maintenance of egg banks in very short-lived pools—a case study with anostracans (Branchiopoda). In Brendonck, L., L. De Meester & N. G. Hairston Jr. (eds), Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Crustacean Diapause. Archiv für Hydrobiologie (Special issues) 52: 141–161.Google Scholar
  23. Colburn, E. A., 2004. Vernal Pools. Natural History and Conservation. McNaughton & Gunn, Inc., Saline, MI.Google Scholar
  24. Daniels, S. R., M. Hamer & D. C. Rogers, 2004. Molecular evidence suggests an ancient radiation for the fairy shrimp genus Streptocephalus (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Waard, J. R., V. Sacherova, M. E. A. Cristescu, E. Remigio, T. Crease & P. D. N. Hebert, 2006. Probing the relationships of the branchiopod crustaceans. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duff, R. J., W. R. Hoeh, D. G. Cook & S. C. Weeks, 2004. Isolation and characterization of thirteen polymorphic microsatellite loci from the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea: Spinicaudata). Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dumont, H. J. & S. Negrea, 2002. Introduction to the Class Branchiopoda. Guides to the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World. Backhuys, Leiden.Google Scholar
  28. Eder, E. & W. Hödl, 2002. Large freshwater branchiopods in Austria: Diversity, threats, conservational status. In Escobar-Briones E. & F. Alvarez (eds), Modern Approaches to the Study of Crustacea. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 281–289.Google Scholar
  29. Ellner, S. & N.G. Hairston Jr., 1994. Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment. The American Naturalists 143: 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fryer, G., 1987. A new classification of the branchiopod Crustacea. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grigarick, A. A., W. H. Lange & D. C. Finfrock, 1961. Control of the tadpole shrimp, Triops longicaudatus, in California rice fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 54: 36–40.Google Scholar
  32. Hamer, M., L. Brendonck, A. Coomans & C. C. Appleton, 1994a. A review of African Streptocephalidae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Part 1: South of Zambezi and Kunene rivers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 3: 235–277.Google Scholar
  33. Hamer, M., L. Brendonck, A. Coomans & C. C. Appleton, 1994b. A review of African Streptocephalidae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Part 2: North of Zambezi and Kunene rivers, and Madagascar. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 3: 279–311.Google Scholar
  34. Hildrew, A. G., 1985. A quantitative study of the life history of a fairy shrimp (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) in relation to the temporary nature of its habitat, a Kenyan rainpool. The Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoeh, W. R., N. D. Smallwood, D. M. Senyo, E. G. Chapman & S. C. Weeks, 2006. Evaluating the monophyly of Eulimnadia and the Limnadiinae (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata) using DNA sequences. Journal of Crustacean Biology 26(2): 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Union of Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2000, 2000. IUCN red list of threatened species, compiled by Craig Hilton-Taylor. IUCN – The World Conservation Union Species Survival Commission.Google Scholar
  37. King, J. L. & R. Hanner, 1998. Cryptic species in a “living fossil” lineage: taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lepidurus (Crustacea: Notostraca) in North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 23–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linder, F., 1941. Contributions to the morphology and the taxonomy of the Branchiopoda Anostraca. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala, 10: 101–302.Google Scholar
  39. Linder, F., 1952. Contributions to the morphology and taxonomy of the Branchiopoda, Notostraca, with special reference to the North American species. Proceedings United States National Museum 102: 1–69.Google Scholar
  40. Longhurst, A. R., 1955. A review of the Notostraca. Bulletin (British Alabama Museum of Natural History, Zoology) 3: 3–57.Google Scholar
  41. Maeda-Martinez, A. M., D. Belk, H. Obregon-Barboza & H. J. Dumont, 1995a. Diagnosis and phylogeny of the New World Streptocephalidae (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Hydrobiologia 298: 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maeda-Martinez, A. M., D. Belk, H. Obregon-Barboza & H. J. Dumont, 1995b. A contribution to the systematics of the Streptocephalidae (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Hydrobiologia 298: 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maeda-Martínez, A. M., H. Obregón-Barboza, H. García-Velazco & G. Murugan, 2000. A proposal on the phylogeny and the historical biogeography of the tadpole shrimp Triops. Anostracan News 8: 1–4.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, J. W., 1989. Eulimnadia belki, a new clam shrimp from Cozumel, Mexico (Conchostraca: Limnadiidae), with a review of Central and South American species of the genus Eulimnadia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9: 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, J. W., 1992. Branchiopoda. In Harrison, F. W. & A. G. Humes (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Crustacea, Vol. 9. Wiley-Liss, New York, 25–224.Google Scholar
  46. Martin, J. W. & D. Belk, 1989. Eulimnadia ovilunata and E. ovisimilis, new species of clam shrimps (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) from South America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 102(4): 894–900.Google Scholar
  47. Martin, J. W. & C. Cash-Clark, 1995. The external morphology of the onychopod “cladoceran” genus Bythotrephes (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Onychopoda, Cercopagididae), with notes on the morphology and phylogeny of the order Onychopoda. Zoologica Scripta 24: 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin, J. W. & G. E. Davis, 2001 An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea Natural History. Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  49. Mura, G., 1986. SEM morphological survey on the egg shell in the italian Anostracans (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Hydrobiologia 134: 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murugan, G., A. M. Maeda-Martínez, H. Obregón-Barboza & N. Y. Hernández-Saavedra, 2002. Molecular characterization of the tadpole shrimp Triops (Branchiopoda: Notostraca) from the Baja California Peninsula, México: New insights on species diversity and phylogeny of the genus. Studies on Large Branchiopod Biology, Hydrobiologia 486: 101–113.Google Scholar
  51. Obregón-Barboza, H., A. M. Maeda-Martínez & G. Murugan, 2001. Reproduction, molting, and growth of two Mexican uniparental forms of the tadpole shrimp Triops (Branchiopoda: Notostraca), under a recirculating culture system. Hydrobiologia 462: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olesen, J., (1998). A phylogenetic analysis of the Conchostraca and Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Diplostraca). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 491–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Remigio, E. A. & P. D. N. Hebert, 2000. Affinities among anostracan (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) families inferred from phylogenetic analyses of multiple gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution 17: 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Remigio, E. A., P. D. N. Hebert & A. Savage, 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and remarkable radiation in Parartemia (Crustacea:Anostraca), the endemic brine shrimp of Australia: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 74: 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Remigio, E. A., B. V. Timms & P. D. N. Hebert, 2003. Phylogenetic systematics of the Australian fairy shrimp genus Branchinella based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23: 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, D. C., 1998. Aquatic macroinvertebrate occurrences and population trends in constructed and natural vernal pools in Folsom, California. In Witham, C. W., E. T. Bauder, D. Belk, W. R. Ferrin Jr. & R. Orduff (eds), Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems—Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA, 224–235.Google Scholar
  57. Rogers, D. C., 2001. Revision of the Nearctic Lepidurus (Notostraca). Journal of Crustacean Biology 21: 991–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers, D. C., 2002a. Amplexial morphology of selected Anostraca. Hydrobiologia 486: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers, D. C., 2002b. A morphological re-evaluation of the anostracan families Linderiellidae and Polyartemiidae, with a redescription of the linderiellid Dexteria floridana (Dexter 1956) (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Hydrobiologia 486: 56–61.Google Scholar
  60. Rogers, D. C., D. Quinney, J. Weaver & J. Olesen, 2006. A new giant species of predatory fairy shrimp from Idaho (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 26: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rogers, D. C., 2006. A genus level revision of the Thamnocephalidae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Zootaxa (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Sanoamuang, L. A., G. Murugan, P. H. H. Weekers & H. J. Dumont, 2000. Streptocephalus sirindhornae, new species of freshwater fairy shrimp (Anostraca) from Thailand. Journal of Crustacean Biology 20: 599–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sassaman, C., 1995. Sex determination and evolution of unisexuality in the Conchostraca. Hydrobiologia 298: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sassaman, C. & S. Weeks, 1993. Sex determination in the conchostracan Eulimnadia texana. The American Naturalist 141: 314–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sassaman, C., M. A. Simovich & M. Fugate, 1997. Reproductive isolation and genetic differentiation in North American species of Triops (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Notostraca). Hydrobiologia 359: 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scanabissi, F., M. Cesari, S. K. Reed & S. C. Weeks, 2006. Ultrastructure of the male gonad and male gametogenesis in Eulimnadia texana (Packard, 1871) (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata). Invertebrate Biology 125: 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spears, T. & L. G. Abele, 2000. Branchiopod monophyly and interordinal phyogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal RNA. Journal of Crustacean Biology 20(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stenderup, J. T., J. Olesen & H. Glenner, 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Branchiopoda (Crustacea)-Multiple approaches suggest a ‘diplostracan’ ancestry of the Notostraca. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 182–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Suno-Uchi, N., F. Sasaki, S. Chiba & M. Kawata, 1997. Morphological stasis and phylogenetic relationships in tadpole shrimps, Triops (Crustacea: Notostraca). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Takahashi, F., 1977. Pioneer life of the tadpole shrimps, Triops spp. (Notostraca: Triopsidae). Applied Journal of Entomolgy and Zoology 12: 104–117.Google Scholar
  71. Tietze, N. S. & M. S. Mulla, 1991. Biological control of Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) by the tadpole shrimp, Triops longicaudataus (Notostraca: Triopsidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 28: 24–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Walossek, D., (1993). The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils and Strata 32: 1–202.Google Scholar
  73. Weekers, P. H. H., G. Murugan, J. Vanfleteren, D. Belk & H. J. Dumont, 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) inferred from SSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 535–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weeks, S. C., R. T. Posgai, M. Cesari & F. Scanabissi, 2005. Androdioecy inferred in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia agassizii (Spinicaudata: Limnadiidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 25: 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weeks, S. C., C. Benvenuto & S. K. Reed, 2006a. When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weeks, S. C., T. F. Sanderson, S. K. Reed, M. Zofkova, B. Knott, U. Balaraman, G. Pereira, D. M. Senyo & W. R. Hoeh, 2006b. Ancient androdioecy in the freshwater crustacean Eulimnadia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273: 725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc Brendonck
    • 1
  • D. Christopher Rogers
    • 2
  • Jorgen Olesen
    • 3
  • Stephen Weeks
    • 4
  • Walter R. Hoeh
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratory of Aquatic EcologyKULeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.EcoAnalysts, Inc.WoodlandUSA
  3. 3.Zoological MuseumUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark
  4. 4.Integrated Bioscience Program, Department of BiologyThe University of AkronAkronUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biological SciencesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations