Hydrobiologia

, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 231–240 | Cite as

Global diversity of Isopod crustaceans (Crustacea; Isopoda) in freshwater

Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment

Abstract

The isopod crustaceans are diverse both morphologically and in described species numbers. Nearly 950 described species (∼9% of all isopods) live in continental waters, and possibly 1,400 species remain undescribed. The high frequency of cryptic species suggests that these figures are underestimates. Several major freshwater taxa have ancient biogeographic patterns dating from the division of the continents into Laurasia (Asellidae, Stenasellidae) and Gondwana (Phreatoicidea, Protojaniridae and Heterias). The suborder Asellota has the most described freshwater species, mostly in the families Asellidae and Stenasellidae. The suborder Phreatoicidea has the largest number of endemic genera. Other primary freshwater taxa have small numbers of described species, although more species are being discovered, especially in the southern hemisphere. The Oniscidea, although primarily terrestrial, has a small number of freshwater species. A diverse group of more derived isopods, the ‘Flabellifera’ sensu lato has regionally important species richness, such as in the Amazon River. These taxa are transitional between marine and freshwater realms and represent multiple colonisations of continental habitats. Most species of freshwater isopods species and many genera are narrow range endemics. This endemism ensures that human demand for fresh water will place these isopods at an increasing risk of extinction, as has already happened in a few documented cases.

Keywords

Isopoda Crustacea Gondwana Laurasia Diversity feeding Reproduction Habits Fresh water Classification 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Argano, R., 1977. Asellota del messico meridionale e Guatemala (Crustacea, Isopoda). problemi attuali di scienza e di cultura. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Quaderno N. 171: 101–124.Google Scholar
  2. Banarescu, P. 1990. Zoogeography of Fresh Waters. General Distribution and Dispersal of Freshwater Animals, Vol. 1. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany: 511.Google Scholar
  3. Baratti, M., M. Bazzicalupo, C. de Filippo & G. Messana, 1999. Detection of genetic variability in stygobitic isopods using RAPD markers. Crustaceana (Leiden) 72: 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, T. E., R. Prins & J. Arenas, 1987. The occurrence of the freshwater isopod Heterias (Fritzianira) exul in the Lakes region of Chile, with notes on the genus Heterias (Asellota: Janiridae). Hydrobiologia 146: 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt, A. & G. C. B. Poore, 2003. Higher classification of the flabelliferan and related Isopoda based on a reappraisal of relationships. Invertebrate Systematics 17: 893–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusca, R. C. & G. D. F. Wilson, 1991. A phylogenetic analysis of the Isopoda with some classificatory recommendations. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 31: 143–204.Google Scholar
  7. Coineau, J.-P., J.-P. Henry, G. Magniez & I. Negoescu, 1994. Isopoda aquatica. In Juberthie C. & V. Decu (eds), Encyclopaedia Biospeologica. Société de Biospéologie Bucarest, 1, 123–140.Google Scholar
  8. Gouws, G., B. A. Stewart & S. R. Daniels, 2004. Cryptic species within the freshwater isopod Mesamphisopus capensis (Phreatoicidea: Amphisopodidae) in the Western Cape, South Africa: allozyme and 12S rRNA sequence data and morphometric evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gouws, G., B. A. Stewart & C. A. Matthee, 2005. Lack of taxonomic differentiation in an apparently widespread freshwater isopod morphotype (Phreatoicidea : Mesamphisopidae : Mesamphisopus) from South Africa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 289–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guinot, D., G. D. F. Wilson & F. R. Schram, 2005. Jurassic isopod (Malacostraca: Peracarida) from Ranville, Normandy, France. Journal of Paleontology 79: 954–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henry, J.-P. & G. Magniez, 1995. Nouvelles données sur les Asellidae épigés d’Extrême-Orient (Crustacea, Isopoda, Asellota). Contributions To Zoology (Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde) 65: 101–122.Google Scholar
  12. Jaume, D., 2001. A new atlantasellid isopod (Asellota : Aselloidea) from the flooded coastal karst of the Dominican Republic (Hispaniola): evidence for an exopod on a thoracic limb and biogeographical implications. Journal of Zoology 255: 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, W. S., M. Stevens & L. Watling, 2001. Reproduction and Development of Marine Peracaridans. Advances in Marine Biology 39: 105–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keable, S. J. & G. D. F. Wilson, 2006. New species of Pygolabis Wilson, 2003 (Isopoda, Tainisopidae) from Western Australia. Zootaxa Zootaxa 1116: 1–27.Google Scholar
  15. Kensley, B. F., M. Schotte & S. Shilling, 2005. World list of marine, freshwater and terrestrial Crustacea Isopoda. National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution: Washington D.C., USA. HTTP://www.nmnh.si.edu/iz/isopod/index.html; accessed 08 September 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Ketmaier, V., 2002. Isolation by distance, gene flow and phylogeography in the Proasellus coxalis-group (Crustacea, Isopoda) in Central Italy: allozyme data. Aquatic Sciences 64: 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ketmaier, V., R. Argano & A. Caccone, 2003. Phylogeography and molecular rates of subterranean aquatic Stenasellid Isopods with a peri-Tyrrhenian distribution. Molecular Ecology 12: 547–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, J. J. & T. E. Bowman, 1981. The subterranean asellids (Caecidotea) of Illinois (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 335: 1–66.Google Scholar
  19. Magniez, G., 1974. Données faunistiques et ecologiques sur les Stenasellidae. International Journal of Speleology 6: 1–180.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholls, G. E., 1944. The Phreatoicoidea. Part II. The Phreatoicidae. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 1943: 1–156.Google Scholar
  21. Sars, G. O. 1897. Isopoda. In Crustacea of Norway, part V, VI, Idotheidae, Arcturidae, Asellidae, Ianiridae, Munnidae. Bergen Museum, Norway: 81–116.Google Scholar
  22. Tabacaru, I., 1999. L’adaptation a la vie aquatique d’un remarquable trichoniscide cavernicole, Cantabroniscus primitivus Vandel, et le probleme de la monophylie des isopods terrestres. Travaux del’Institut Speologie “Emile Racovitsa” 37–38: 115–132.Google Scholar
  23. Tabacaru, I. & D. L. Danielopol, 1999. Contribution a la connaissance de la phylogénie des Isopoda (Crustacea). Vie et Milieu 49: 163–176.Google Scholar
  24. Taiti, S. & W. F. Humphreys, 2001. New aquatic Oniscidea (Crustacea: Isopoda) from groundwater calcretes of Western Australia. Records of the Western Australia Museum, Supplement 64: 133–151.Google Scholar
  25. Turk, S., B. Sket & S. Sarbu, 1996. Comparison between some epigean and hypogean populations of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae). Hydrobiologia 337: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verovnik, R., B. Sket, S. Prevorcnik & P. Trontelj, 2003. Random amplified polymorphic DNA diversity among surface and subterranean populations of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Genetica 119: 155–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wägele, J. W., 1983. On the origin of the Microcerberidae (Crustacea: Isopoda). Zeitschrift fuer Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 21: 249–262.Google Scholar
  28. Wägele, J. W., 1989. Evolution und phylogenetisches System der Isopoda. Stand der Forschung und neue Erkenntnisse. Zoologica 140: 1–262.Google Scholar
  29. Wägele, J.-W., N. J. Voelz & J. V. McArthur, 1995. Older than the Atlantic Ocean: Discovery of a fresh-water Microcerberus (Isopoda) in North America and erection of Coxicerberus, new genus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 15: 733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, G. D. F., 1987. The road to the Janiroidea: Comparative morphology and evolution of the asellote isopod crustaceans. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 25: 257–280.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, G. D. F., 1991. Functional morphology and evolution of isopod genitalia. In: Bauer R. T. & J. W. Martin (eds), Crustacean Sexual Biology. Columbia University Press, New York/Oxford: 228–245.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, G. D. F., 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of the isopod family Janiridae (Crustacea). Invertebrate Taxonomy 8: 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, G. D. F., 1996. Of uropods and isopod crustacean trees: A comparison of “groundpattern” and cladistic methods. Vie et Milieu 46: 139–153.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, G. D. F., 1999. Some of the deep-sea fauna is ancient. Crustaceana (Leiden) 72: 1020–1030.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, G. D. F., 2003. A new genus of Tainisopidae fam. nov. (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Pilbara, Western Australia. Zootaxa 245: 1–20.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, G. D. F. & G. D. Edgecombe, 2003. The Triassic isopod Protamphisopus wianamattensis (Chilton) and comparison with extant taxa (Crustacea, Phreatoicidea). Journal of Paleontology 77: 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, G. D. F. & G. D. Fenwick, 1999. Taxonomy and ecology of Phreatoicus typicus Chilton, 1883 (Crustacea, Isopoda, Phreatoicidae). Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand 29: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, G. D. F. & R. T. Johnson, 1999. Ancient endemism among freshwater isopods (Crustacea, Phreatoicidea). In: Ponder W. F. & D. Lunney (eds), The Other 99%. The conservation and Biodiversity of Invertebrates. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mossman: 264–268.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, G. D. F. & J.-W. Wägele, 1994. A systematic review of the family Janiridae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellota). Invertebrate Taxonomy 8: 683–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zimmer, M., 2002. Nutrition in terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea): an evolutionary-ecological approach. Biological Reviews 77: 455–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zimmer, M. & S. Bartholme, 2003. Bacterial endosymbionts in Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda) and Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda) and their contribution to digestion. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 2208–2213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Invertebrate ZoologyAustralian MuseumSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations