, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 225–230 | Cite as

Global diversity of cumaceans & tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Cumacea & Tanaidacea) in freshwater

  • D. JaumeEmail author
  • G. A. Boxshall
Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment


Cumacea and Tanaidacea are marginal groups in continental waters. Although many euryhaline species from both groups are found in estuaries and coastal lagoons, most occur only temporarily in non-marine habitats, appearing unable to form stable populations there. A total of 21 genuinely non-marine cumaceans are known, mostly concentrated in the Ponto-Caspian region, and only four tanaids have been reported from non-marine environments. Most non-marine cumaceans (19 species) belong in the Pseudocumatidae and appear restricted to the Caspian Sea (with salinity up to 13‰) and its peripheral fluvial basins, including the northern, lower salinity zones of the Black Sea (Sea of Azov). There are nine Ponto-Caspian genera, all endemic to the region. Only two other taxa (in the family Nannastacidae) occur in areas free of any marine–water influence, in river basins in North and South America. Both seem able to survive in waters of raised salinity of the lower reaches of these fluvial systems; but neither has been recorded in full salinity marine environments. The only non-marine tanaidacean thus far known lives in a slightly brackish inland spring in Northern Australia. The genus includes a second species, from a brackish-water lake at the Bismarck Archipelago, tentatively included here as non-marine also. Two additional species of tanaidaceans have been reported from non-marine habitats but both also occur in the sea.


Freshwater Global assessment Species richness Peracarida Crustacea 



This is a contribution to Spanish MEC project CGL2005-02217/ BOS.


  1. Antsulevich, A. E., 2005. First finding of Cumacea crustaceans in the Gulf of Finland. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta: Seriia 3—Biologiia 1: 84–87 (in Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
  2. Băcescu, M., 1992. Cumacea II. Crustaceorum Catalogus 8: 175–468.Google Scholar
  3. Băcescu, M. & I. Petrescu, 1999. Ordre des Cumacés (Cumacea Krøyer, 1846). In Forest, J. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie. Tome VII (Fascicule III A), Crustacés Péracarides. Mémoires de l’Institut Océanographique, Monaco 19: 391–428.Google Scholar
  4. Czerniavsky, V., 1868. Materialia ad zoographiam Ponticam comparatum. Transactions of the first meeting of Russian naturalists in Saint Petersburg, 1868: 19–136, 8 pls.Google Scholar
  5. Derzhavin, A., 1912. Neue Cumaceen aus dem Kaspischen Meer. Zoologischer Anzeiger 39: 273–284.Google Scholar
  6. Dumont, H. J., 2000. Endemism in the Ponto-Caspian Fauna, with special emphasis on the Onychopoda (Crustacea). Advances in Ecological Research 31: 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, N. S. & W. D. Burbanck, 1959. Almyracuma proximoculi gen. et spec. nov. (Crustacea, Cumacea) from brackish water of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin 116: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K., 1972. Notes about the tanaidacean fauna (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of the Kirmadec Trench. Complex Research of the Nature of the Ocean. Publications Moscow University 3: 257–258.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen, K. & T. Hansknecht, 2004. A new genus and species of freshwater tanaidacean Pseudohalmyrapseudes aquadulcis (Apseudomorpha: Parapseudidae), from Northern Territory, Australia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 24: 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F. D. & N. N. Romanova, 1973. A new genus of Cumacea from the Caspian Sea. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 52: 429–432.Google Scholar
  11. Roccatagliata, D., 1981. Claudicuma platensis gen. et sp. nov. (Crustacea, Cumacea) de la ribera argentina del Río de la Plata. Physis (Buenos Aires) 39: 79–87.Google Scholar
  12. Roccatagliata, D., 1991. Claudicuma platense Roccatagliata, 1981 (Cumacea): a new reproductive pattern. Journal of Crustacean Biology 11: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sars, G. O., 1894. Crustacea Caspia, part II. Cumacea. Bulletin de l’Academie Impériale des Sciences de St Petersburg 16: 297–338.Google Scholar
  14. Sars, G. O., 1897. On some additional Crustacea from the Caspian Sea. Annuaire du Musée Zoologique de l’Académie Imperiale des Sciences. St Petersburg 1897: 1–73, 8 pls.Google Scholar
  15. Sars, G. O., 1914. Report on the Cumacea of the Caspian Expedition 1904. Trudy Kaspiĭskoĭ Ékspeditzī 1904 ghoda. 4: 1–34 (in Russian), 1–32 (in English), 12 pls.Google Scholar
  16. Shiino, S. M., 1965. Tanaidacea from the Bismarck Archipelago. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjøbenhavn 128: 177–203.Google Scholar
  17. Simpson, K. W., J. P. Fagnani, D. M. DeNicola & R. W. Bode, 1985. Widespread distribution of some estuarine crustaceans (Cyathura polita, Chiridotea almyra, Almyracuma proximoculi) in the limnetic zone of the Lower Hudson River, New York. Estuaries 8: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sowinski, W., 1893. Report on the Crustacea collected by Dr. Ostroumow in the Sea of Azov. Zapiski Kievskago Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei 14: 289–405, (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios AvanzadosEsporlesSpain
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyThe Natural History MuseumLondonUK

Personalised recommendations