Global diversity of mysids (Crustacea-Mysida) in freshwater
In this article we present a biogeographical assessment of species diversity within the Mysida (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida) from inland waters. Inland species represent 6.7% (72 species) of mysid diversity. These species represent three of the four families within the Mysida (Lepidomysidae, Stygiomysidae, and Mysidae) and are concentrated in the Palaearctic and Neotropical regions. The inland mysid species distributional patterns can be explained by four main groups representing different freshwater invasion routes: (1) Subterranean Tethyan relicts (24 spp.); (2) Autochthonous Ponto-Caspian endemics (20 spp.); (3) Mysis spp. ‘Glacial Relicts’ (8 spp.); and (4) Euryhaline estuarine species (20 spp.). The center of inland mysid species diversity is the Ponto-Caspian region, containing 24 species, a large portion of which are the results of a radiation in the genus Paramysis.
KeywordsInland fauna Freshwater biology Mysid Diversity
We thank R. Väinölä for advice concerning the Ponto-Caspian mysid fauna and for the helpful suggestions of one anonymous reviewer. T. bowmani and A. almyra images by E. Peebles from ‘Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans’ are courtesy of the American Fisheries Society. This work was supported by NSF grant DEB-0206537.
- Audzijonytë, A., 2006. Diversity and zoogeography of continental mysid crustaceans. Walter and Andrée de Nottbeck Foundation Scientific Reports 28: 1–46.Google Scholar
- Audzijonytë, A. & R. Väinölä, 2005. Diversity and distributions of circumpolar fresh- and brackish-water Mysis (Crustacea: Mysida): descriptions of M. relicta Lovén, 1862, M. salemaai n. sp., M. segerstralei n. sp. and M. diluviana n. sp., based on molecular and morphological characters. Hydrobiologia 544: 89–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banarescu P., 1991. Zoogeography of Fresh Waters, Vol. 2. Distribution and Dispersal of Freshwater Animals in North American and Eurasia. Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
- Boxshall, G. A. & D. Jaume, 2000. Discoveries of cave misophrioids (Crustacea: Copepoda) shed new light on the origin of anchialine faunas. Zoologischer Anzeiger 239: 1–19.Google Scholar
- Ketelaars, H. A. M., F. E. Lambregts-van de Clundert, C. J. Carpentier, A. J. Wagenvoort & W. Hoogenboezem, 1999. Ecological effects of the mass occurrence of the Ponto-Caspian invader, Hemimysis anomala GO Sars, 1907 (Crustacea: Mysidacea), in a freshwater storage reservoir in the Netherlands, with notes on its autecology and new records. Hydrobiologia 394: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, J. W. & G. E. Davis, 2001. An updated classification of the recent crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 39: 1–124.Google Scholar
- Meland, K. & E. Willassen, 2007. The disunity of “Mysidacea” (Crustacea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.009
- Northcote, T. G., 1991. Success, problems, and control of introduced mysid populations in lakes and reservoirs. American Fisheries Society Symposium 9: 5–16.Google Scholar
- Wittmann K. J., 1999. Global biodiversity in Mysidacea, with notes on the effects of human impact. In Schram F. R. & J. C. von Vaupel Klein (eds), Crustaceans and the Biodiversity Crisis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Crustacean Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 20–24, 1998, Vol. I. Brill NV, Leiden: 511–525.Google Scholar