Hydrobiologia

, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 61–66 | Cite as

Global diversity of nemerteans (Nemertea) in freshwater

Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment

Abstract

Most ribborn worms (phylum Nemertea) are marine and only 22 of the currently named around 1,200 species are known from freshwater habitats (mainly lakes/ponds). They are all free-living benthic forms found in all continents except Antarctica. The vast majority of species have been recorded from the Palearctic region, but this may reflect sampling efforts rather than biogeography.

Keywords

Ribbon worms Freshwater Diversity Phylogeny 

References

  1. Dawydoff, C., 1937. Une Métanémerte nouvelle, appartenant á un groupe purement marin, provenant du Grand Lac du Cambodge. Compte rendu hebdomadaire de Séances de l′Academie des Sciences, Paris 204: 804–806.Google Scholar
  2. Gibson, R., 1995. Nemertean genera and species of the world: An annotated checklist of original names and description citations, synonyms, current taxonomic status, habitats and recorded zoogeographic distribution. Journal of Natural History 29: 271–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson, R. & J. Moore, 1976. Freshwater nemerteans. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 177–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gibson, R. & J. Moore, 1978. Freshwater nemerteans: New records of Prostoma and a description of Prostoma canadiensis sp. nov. Zoologischer Anzeiger 201: 77–85.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson, R. & J. Moore, 1989. Functional requirements for the invasion of land and freshwater habitats by nemertean worms. Journal of Zoology, London 219: 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giribet, G. G., D. L. Distel, M. Polz, W. Sterrer & W. C. Wheeler, 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes and Chaetognatha: A combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology 49: 539–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1985. The evolution and comparative physiology of terrestrial and freshwater nemerteans. Biological Reviews 60: 257–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1988. Further studies on the evolution of land and freshwater nemerteans: Generic relationships among the paramonostiliferous taxa. Journal of Zoology, London 216: 1–20.Google Scholar
  9. Norenburg, J. L. & S. A. Stricker, 2002. Phylum Nemertea. In Young, C., M. Sewell & M. Rice (eds), Atlas of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. Academic Press, 163–177.Google Scholar
  10. Strand, M. & P. Sundberg, 2005a. Delimiting species in the hoplonemertean genus Tetrastemma (phylum Nemertea): Morphology is not concordant with phylogeny as evidenced from mtDNA sequences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 86: 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Strand, M. & P. Sundberg, 2005b. Genus Tetrastemma Ehrenberg, 1831 (phylum Nemertea)—a natural group? Phylogenetic relationships inferred from partial 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 144–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sundberg, P., 1989. Phylogeny and cladistic classification of the paramonostiliferous family Plectonemertidae (phylum Nemertea). Cladistics 5: 87–100.Google Scholar
  13. Sundberg, P., J. M. Turbeville & S. Lindh, 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among higher nemertean (Nemertea) taxa inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thollesson, M. & J. L. Norenburg, 2003. Ribbon worm relationships: A phylogeny of the phylum Nemertea. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London. Series B. 270: 407–415.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyGöteborg UniversityGoteborgSweden
  2. 2.School of Biological and Earth SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations