, Volume 595, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Global diversity of rotifers (Rotifera) in freshwater

  • Hendrik SegersEmail author


Rotifera is a Phylum of primary freshwater Metazoa containing two major groups: the heterogonic Monogononta and the exclusively parthenogenetic Bdelloidea. Monogononta contains 1,570 species-level taxa, of which a majority (1,488) are free-living fresh or inland water taxa. Bdelloidea contains 461 “species,” only one of which is marine, but with many limnoterrestrial representatives or animals of unknown ecology. Actual numbers may be much higher, considering the occurrence of cryptic speciation in Monogononta and the unsatisfactory nature of taxonomic knowledge. Rotifers, mostly monogononts, occur in all types of water bodies, worldwide. They are particularly diverse in the littoral zone of stagnant waterbodies with soft, slightly acidic water and under oligo- to mesotrophic conditions. The rotifer record is highest in the Northern hemisphere, which may be due to the concentration of studies in those regions. Diversity is highest in the (sub)tropics; hotspots are northeast North America, tropical South America, Southeast Asia, Australia, and Lake Baikal, endemicity is low in Africa (including Madagascar), Europe, the Indian subcontinent, and Antarctica. Although the lack of fossil evidence and of molecular phylogenetic studies are major hindrances, contrasting hypotheses on the origin and evolutionary history of Brachionus, Macrochaetus, and Trichocerca are presented.


Monogononta Bdelloidea Freshwater Biodiversity Zoogeography Review 


  1. Beres, K. A., R. L. Wallace & H. H. Segers, 2005. Rotifers and Hubbell’s unified neutral theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Natural Resource Modeling 18(3): 363–376.Google Scholar
  2. Ciros-Pérez, J., A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2001. On the taxonomy of three sympatric sibling species of the Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) complex from Spain, with the description of B. ibericus n. sp. Journal of Plankton Research 23: 1311–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dartnall, H. J. G., 2005. Are Antarctic planktonic rotifers anthropogenic introductions? Quekett Journal of Microscopy 40: 137–143.Google Scholar
  4. De Meester, L., A. Gómez, B. Okamura & K. Schwenk, 2002. The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23: 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Ridder, M., 1981. Some considerations on the geographical distribution of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 85: 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Ridder, M., 1986. Annotated checklist of non-marine Rotifera from African inland waters. Koninklijk Museum voor Miden Afrika, Tervuren, Zoologische Documentatie 21: 123 pp.Google Scholar
  7. De Ridder, M., 1991. Additions to the “Annotated checklist of non-marine rotifers from African inland waters”. Revue d’Hydrobiologie tropicale 24(1): 25–46.Google Scholar
  8. De Ridder, M., 1994. Additions II to the “Annotated checklist of non-marine rotifers from African inland waters”. Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea 61: 99–153.Google Scholar
  9. De Ridder, M. & H. Segers, 1997. Rotifera Monogononta in six zoogeographical regions after publications between 1960 and 1992. Studiedocumenten van het Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen 88: 481 pp.Google Scholar
  10. De Smet, W. H., 1996. Rotifera 4: The Proalidae (Monogononta). In Nogrady T., & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the World 9. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. De Smet, W. H. & R. Pourriot, 1997. Rotifera 5: The Dicranophoridae (Monogononta) and the Ituridae (Monogononta). In Nogrady T., & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 12. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Dumont, H. J., 1980. Workshop on taxonomy and Biogeography. Hydrobiologia 73: 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumont, H. J., 1983. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumont, H. & H. Segers, 1996. Estimating lacustrine zooplankton species richness and complementarity. Hydrobiologia 341: 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenchel, T. & B. J. Finlay, 2004. The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54: 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fontaneto, D., W. H. De Smet & C. Ricci, 2006. Rotifers in saltwater environments, re-evaluation of an inconspicuous taxon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86: 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giri, F. & S. José de Paggi, 2006. Geometric morphometric and biometric analysis for the systematic elucidation of Brachionus caudatus Barrois and Daday, 1894 (Rotifera Monogononta Brachionidae) forms. Zoologischer Anzeiger 244: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giribet, G., D. L. Distel, M. Polz, W. Sterrer & W. C. Wheeler, 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rRNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology 49: 539–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez, A., M. Serra, G. R. Carvalho & D. H. Lunt, 2002. Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution 56: 1431–1445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, J. J., 1972. Latitudinal variation in associations of planktonic Rotifera. Journal of Zoology, London 167: 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harring, H. K. & F. J. Myers, 1928. The rotifer fauna of Wisconsin. IV. The Dicranophorinae. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 23: 667–808.Google Scholar
  22. Hay, W. W., R. M. DeConto, C. N. Wold, K. M. Wilson, S. Voigt, M. Schulz, A. R. Wold, W.-C. Dullo, A. B. Ronov, A. N. Balukhovsky & E. Söding, 1999. Alternative global Cretaceous paleogeography. In: Barrera, E. & C. C. Johnson (eds), Evolution of the Cretaceous ocean-climate system. Geological Society of America Special Paper 332: 1–47.Google Scholar
  23. Hubbell, S. P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology 32. Princeton University press, Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Jersabek, C. D., 2003. Freshwater Rotifera (Monogononta) from Hawai’i—a preliminary checklist. In: Evenhuis, N. L. & L. G. Eldredge (eds), Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2001–2002—Part II: Notes. Bishop Museum occasional papers 74: 46–72.Google Scholar
  25. Mark Welch, D. B., 2000. Evidence from a protein-coding gene that acanthocephalans are rotifers. Invertebrate Biology 119: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myers, F. J., 1942. The rotatorian fauna of the Pocono Plateau and environs. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 44: 251–285, 3 plates.Google Scholar
  27. Nogrady, T., R. Pourriot & H. Segers, 1995. Rotifera 3: The Notommatidae and The Scaridiidae. In Nogrady T. & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 8. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  28. Nogrady, T., & H. Segers (eds), 2002. Rotifera 6; The Asplanchnidae, Gastropodidae, Lindiidae, Microcodinidae, Synchaetidae, Trochosphaeridae. In Dumont, H. J. (ed.), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 18. Backhuys Publishers BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Pejler, B., 1977. On the global distribution of the family Brachionidae (Rotatoria). Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Beihefte 8: 212–220.Google Scholar
  30. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1989. Problems in taxonomy of rotifers, exemplified by the Filinia longiseta – terminalis complex. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ricci, C., R. Shiel, D. Fontaneto & G. Melone, 2003. Bdelloid rotifers recorded from Australia with description of Philodinavus aussiensis n.sp. Zoologischer Anzeiger 242: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Segers, H., 1995a. Rotifera 2. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). In Nogrady T. & H.J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 6. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  33. Segers, H., 1995b. World records of Lecanidae (Rotifera: Monogononta). Studiedocumenten van het Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen 81: 114 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Segers, H., 1996. The biogeography of littoral Lecane Rotifera. Hydrobiologia 323: 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Segers, H., 2001. Zoogeography of the Southeast Asian Rotifera. Hydrobiologia 446/447: 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Segers, H., 2003. A biogeographical analysis of rotifers of the genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 (Trichocercidae, Monogononta, Rotifera), with notes on taxonomy. Hydrobiologia 500: 113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Segers, H., 2007. A global checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera). Zootaxa 1564: 1–104.Google Scholar
  38. Snell, T. W., 1989. Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sørensen, M. V. & G. Giribet, 2006. A modern approach to rotiferan phylogeny: Combining morphological and molecular data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 585–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wallace, R. L., T. W. Snell, C. Ricci, & T. Nogrady, 2006. Rotifera vol. 1: biology, ecology and systematics (2nd edition). In Segers H., & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, 23. Kenobi Productions, Gent, Belgium and Backhuys Academic Publishing BV. The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Freshwater LaboratoryRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural SciencesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations