Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 579, Issue 1, pp 317–335 | Cite as

Genetic and morphologic variation of the Pecos assiminea, an endangered mollusk of the Rio Grande region, United States and Mexico (Caenogastropoda: Rissooidea: Assimineidae)

  • Robert Hershler
  • Hsiu-Ping Liu
  • B. K. Lang
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Assiminea pecos is an endangered species of amphibious gastropod that occupies four widely separated portions of the Rio Grande region in the southwestern United States (Pecos River basin) and northeastern Mexico (Cuatro Cienegas basin). Our statistical and discriminant function analyses of shell variation among the disjunct populations of this species indicate that Mexican specimens differ in their morphometry from those of the United States and can be diagnosed by several characters. We also analyzed variation in the mitochondrial genome by sequencing 658 bp of mitochondrial COI from populations of A. pecos, representatives of the other three North American species of Assiminea, and several outgroups. Our results indicated substantial divergence of the Mexican population of A. pecos, which was consistently depicted as a monophyletic unit nested within or sister to the shallowly structured group comprised of American members of this species. Consistent with our findings, we describe the Mexican population as a new species, which is provisionally placed in the large, worldwide genus Assiminea pending further study of the phylogentic relationships of the North American assimineids. Our molecular data suggest that the Rio Grande region assimineids, which are among the few inland members of the otherwise estuarine subfamily Assimineinae, diverged from coastal progenitors in the late Miocene, with subsequent Pleistocene vicariance of Mexican and American species perhaps associated with development of the modern, lower course of the Rio Grande.

Keywords

Assiminea Gastropoda North America Systematics Biogeography Conservation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The following individuals collected material used in this study and/or assisted with our fieldwork—N. Allan, L. L. Crisostomo, V. Gervasio, M. E. Gordon, T. Hyde, M. G. Kellogg, S. Knapp, J. J. Landye, A. L. Metcalf, L. Manning, F. G. Thompson, C.-l. Tsai, and S.-K. Wu. Scanning electron microscopy and shell measurements were performed by Y. Villacampa. K. Darrow and M. K. Ryan assisted with preparation of the map and specimen drawings, and D. Barrett kindly wrote a Perl Script that eased data file conversion. Tom Quinn (University of Denver) and Sara Oyler-McCance (United States Geological Survey) generously shared bench space and equipment in the Rocky Mountain Center for Conservation Genetics and Systematics. The first author’s fieldwork was supported, in part, by contract funds provided by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 2) and the State of New Mexico. Permission to collect on Nature Conservancy land in Texas was authorized by John Karges. This paper benefited from comments provided by Martin Haase and an anonymous reviewer.

References

  1. Abbott, R. T., 1958. The gastropod genus Assiminea in the Philippines. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 110: 213–278.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, R. T., 1974. American seashells. The marine Mollusca of the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts of North America. 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, J. M., E. López-Medrano, A. G. Navarro-Sigüenza, O. R. Rojas-Soto & K. E. Omland, 2003. Recent speciation in the Orchard Oriole group: divergence of Icterus spurius and Icterus spurius fuertesi. Auk 120: 848–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, S. S., 1947. A surprising molluscan discovery in Death Valley. Leaflets in Malacology 1: 5–8.Google Scholar
  5. Brewster-Wingard, G. L., T. M. Scott, L. E. Edwards, S. D. Weedman & K. R. Simmons, 1997. Reinterpretation of the peninsular Florida Oligocene: an integrated stratigraphic approach. Sedimentary Geology 108: 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucklin, A., 1992. Use of formalin-preserved samples for molecular analysis. Newsletter of Crustacean Molecular Techniques 2: 3.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, J. C., B. D. Stone, R. R. Shroba & D. P. Dethier, 2001. Episodic Pliocene and Pleistocene drainage integration along the Rio Grande through New Mexico. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 33: 357.Google Scholar
  8. Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz & R. Vrijenhoek, 1994. DNA primers for amplication of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fukuda, H. & T. Mitoki, 1996. A revision of the family Assimineidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neotaenioglossa) stored in the Yamaguchi Museum. Part 3, Subfamily Assimineinae (2) Angustassiminea and Pseudomphala. The Yuriyagai 4: 109–137.Google Scholar
  10. Fukuda, H. & W. F. Ponder, 2003. Australian freshwater assimineids, with a synopsis of the Recent genus-group taxa of the Assimineidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Rissooidea). Journal of Natural History 37: 1977–2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuda, H. & W. F. Ponder, 2005. A revision of the Australian taxa previously attributed to Assiminea buccinoides (Quoy & Gaimard) and Assiminea tasmanica Tenison-Woods (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Assimineidae). Invertebrate Systematics 19: 325–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Funk, D. J. & K. E. Omland, 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 34: 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galloway, W. E., 2005. Gulf of Mexico depositional record of Cenozoic North American drainage basin evolution. International Association of Sedimentology Special Publication 35: 409–423.Google Scholar
  14. Galloway, W. E., P. E. Ganey-Curry, X. Li & R. T. Buffler, 2000. Cenozoic depositional history of the Gulf of Mexico basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 84: 1743–1774.Google Scholar
  15. Hershler, R., 1989. Springsnails (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae) of Owens and Amargosa River (exclusive of Ash Meadows) drainages, Death Valley system, California-Nevada. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 102: 176–248.Google Scholar
  16. Hershler, R., 1998. A systematic review of the hydrobiid snails (Gastropoda: Rissooidea) of the Great Basin, western United States. Part I. Genus Pyrgulopsis. Veliger 41: 1–132.Google Scholar
  17. Hershler, R., H.-P. Liu & M. Mulvey, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships within the aquatic snail genus Tryonia: implications for biogeography of the North American Southwest. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 377–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hershler, R., H.-P. Liu, T. J. Frest & E. J. Johannes, 2006a. Extensive diversification of pebblesnails (Lithoglyphidae: Fluminicola) in the upper Sacramento River basin, northwestern United States. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Hershler, R., H.-P. Liu, T. J. Frest, E. J. Johannes & W. H. Clark, 2006b. Genetic structure of the western North American aquatic gastropod genus Taylorconcha and description of a second species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 72: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hosman, R. L., 1996. Regional stratigraphy and subsurface geology of Cenozoic deposits, Gulf Coastal Plain, South-Central United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1416: G1–G35.Google Scholar
  21. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist, 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kondo, B., J. M. Baker & K. E. Omland, 2004. Recent speciation between the Baltimore Oriole and the Black-backed Oriole. Condor 106: 674–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar, S., K. Tamura & M. Nei, 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, H.-P. & R. Hershler, 2005. Molecular systematics and radiation of western North American nymphophiline gastropods. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 284–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, H.-P., R. Hershler & K. Clift, 2003. Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal extensive cryptic diversity within a western American springsnail. Molecular Ecology 12: 2771–2782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mack, G. H., 1997. Neogene evolution of the Rio Grande, the axial river of the Rio Grande Rift, southwestern USA. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 29: 239.Google Scholar
  27. NatureServe, 2006. NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 4.7. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available from http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: May 18, 2006).
  28. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (NMDGF), 2004. Recovery and conservation plan for four invertebrate species: Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus desperatus), Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos), Koster’s springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), and Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis). New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Conservation Services Division, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
  29. Omland, K. E., J. M. Baker & J. L. Peters, 2006. Genetic signatures of intermediate divergence: population history of Old and New World Holarctic ravens (Corvus corax). Molecular Ecology 15: 795–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ponder, W. F. & R. G. DeKeyzer, 1998. Superfamily Rissooidea. In Beesley P. L., G. J. B. Ross, & A. Wells (eds), Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 5. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne: 745–766.Google Scholar
  31. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall, 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sites, J. W. Jr & J. C. Marshall, 2004. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swofford, D. L., 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Systat Software, Inc. (SSI), 2004. Systat® for Windows®. Richmond (CA).Google Scholar
  35. Tavare, S., 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17: 57–86.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, D. W., 1966. A remarkable snail fauna from Coahuila, México. Veliger 9: 152–228.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, D. W., 1985. Evolution of freshwater drainages and molluscs in western North America. In C. J. Smiley & A. J. Leviton (eds), Late Cenozoic history of the Pacific Northwest, interdisciplinary studies on the Clarkia fossil beds of northern Idaho. American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA: 265–321.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, D. W., 1987. Fresh-water molluscs from New Mexico and vicinity. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletin 116: 1–50.Google Scholar
  39. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione & J. D. Williams, 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Scientific Publication 26: 1–526.Google Scholar
  40. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2002. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; listing Roswell springsnail, Kosters’ tryonia, Pecos Assiminea, and Noel’s amphipod as endangered with critical habitat. Federal Register 67: 6459–6479.Google Scholar
  41. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2005. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; listing Roswell springsnail, Kosters’ springsnail, Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos Assiminea as endangered with critical habitat; final rule. Federal Register 70: 46304–46333.Google Scholar
  42. Wilke, T., 2003. Salenthydrobia gen. nov. (Rissooidea: Hydrobiidae): a potential relict of the Messinian salinity crisis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 137: 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Invertebrate ZoologySmithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.New Mexico Department of Game and FishSanta FeUSA

Personalised recommendations