Hydrobiologia

, Volume 570, Issue 1, pp 183–188

Risk assessment method for submerged weeds in New Zealand hydroelectric lakes

Article

Abstract

The latent potential for problematic weed growth in a hydro-lake is proportional to water level fluctuation, water clarity, lake shape, littoral gradient and exposure to wave action. These five factors were used to assess a score for measuring the latent potential for weed impact and each factor was allocated a score of 1–5, with a theoretical maximum of 25. Any hydro-lake scoring above 15 could be expected to present potential inconvenience to power generation, given the presence of suitable submerged weed species. Assessment of potential impact arising from weed invasion must firstly determine what species are already established, and whether it is possible for a weed species of greater potential impact to be introduced. The risk of this occurring is dependent upon a number of factors, including public accessibility, proximity to sources of those species and the desirability of the waterbody to potential weed vectors. Once these factors are quantified, appropriate surveillance strategies in high-risk hydro-lakes may then be developed.

Keywords

aquatic plants weed potential risk assessment weed management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, M. M., Hamad, A., Springuel, I. V., Murphy, K. J. 1995Environmental factors affecting submerged macrophyte communities in regulated waterbodies in EgyptArchiv Fur Hydrobiologie133107128Google Scholar
  2. Clayton, J. S. 1982Effects of fluctuations in water level and growth of Lagarosiphon major on the aquatic vascular plants in Lake Rotorua 1973–80New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research168994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clayton, J. S. 1996Aquatic weeds and their control in New Zealand LakesLake and Reservoir Management12477486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Champion, P. D., Clayton, J. S. 2001

    A weed risk assessment model for aquatic weeds in New Zealand

    Groves, R. H.Panetta, F. D.Virtue, J. G. eds. Weed Risk AssessmentCSIRO PublicationsMelbourne244
    Google Scholar
  5. Haramoto, T., Ikusima, I. 1988Life cycle of Egeria densa Planch., an aquatic plant naturalized in JapanAquatic Botany30389403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howard-Williams, C., Davies, J. 1998The invasion of Lake Taupo by the submerged water weed Lagarosiphon major and its impact on the native floraNew. Zealand Journal of Ecology111319Google Scholar
  7. Howard-Williams, C., J. S. Clayton, B. T. Coffey & I. M. Johnstone, 1987. Macrophyte invasions. In Viner A. B. (ed.), Inland Waters of New Zealand. DSIR Bulletin 241, 319 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnstone, I. M., Coffey, B. T., Howard-Williams, C. 1987The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case studyJournal of Environmental Management20263279Google Scholar
  9. Spencer, W. E., Wetzel, R. G. 1993Acclimation of photosynthesis and dark respiration of a submersed angiosperm beneath ice in a temperate lakePlant Physiology101985991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Springuel, I., Murphy, K. J. 1991Euhydrophyte communities of the River Nile and its impoundments in Egyptian NubiaHydrobiologia2183547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Widgery, D. E., 1967. Water weeds versus water power. In Chapman V. J. & C. A. Bell (eds), Rotorua and Waikato Water Weeds. University of Auckland, 76 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations