Hydrobiologia

, Volume 569, Issue 1, pp 449–455 | Cite as

Influence of teleost abundance on the distribution and abundance of sharks in Florida Bay, USA

  • Leigh  G. Torres
  • Michael  R. Heithaus
  • Bryan Delius
Article

Abstract

Understanding the factors that influence the distribution and abundance of predators, including sharks, is important for predicting the impacts of human changes to the environment. Such studies are particularly important in Florida Bay, USA where there are planned large-scale changes to patterns of freshwater input from the Everglades ecosystem. Studies of many marine predators suggest that links between predator and prey habitat use may vary with spatial scale, but there have been few studies of the role of prey distribution in shaping habitat use and abundance of sharks. We used longline catches of sharks and trawls for potential teleost prey to determine the influence of teleost abundance on shark abundance at the scale of regions and habitats in Florida Bay. We found that shark catch per unit effort (CPUE) was not linked to CPUE ofteleosts at the scale of sampling sites, but shark CPUE was positively correlated with the mean CPUE for teleosts within a region. Although there does not appear to be a strong match between the abundance of teleosts and sharks at small spatial scales, regional shark abundance is likely driven, at least partially, by the availability of prey. Management strategies that influence teleost abundance will have cascading effects to higher trophic levels in Florida Bay.

Keywords

sharks habitat use spatial scale predator–prey interactions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

supp.pdf (17 kb)
Supplementary material

References

  1. Butler, M. J.,IV, Hunt, J. H., Herrnkind, W. F., Childress, M. J., Bertelsen, R., Sharp, W., Matthews, T., Field, J. M., Marshall, G. 1995Cascading disturbances in Florida Bay, USA: cyanobacteria blooms, sponge mortality, and implications for juvenile spiny lobster Panulirus argusMarine Ecology Progress Series129119125Google Scholar
  2. Fauchald, P. K., Erikstad, E., Skarsfjord, H. 2000Scale-dependent predator–prey interactions: the hierarchical spatial distribution of seabirds and preyEcology81773783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fretwell, S. D., Lucas, H. L.,Jr. 1970On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birdsActa Biotheoretica191636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guinet, C., Dubroca, L., Lea, M. A., Goldsworthy, S., Cherel, Y., Duhamel, G., Bonadonna, F., Donnay, J. P. 2001Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systemsMarine Ecology Progress Series219251264Google Scholar
  5. Heithaus, M. R. 2001The biology of tiger sharks, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Shark Bay, Western Australia: sex ratio, size distribution, diet, and seasonal changes in catch ratesEnvironmental Biology of Fishes612536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heithaus, M. R., Dill, L. M., Marshall, G. J., Buhleier, B. 2002Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystemMarine Biology140237248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heithaus, M. R. 2004

    Predator–prey interactions

    Carrier, J.C.Musick, J.A.Heithaus, M. R. eds. Biology of Sharks and their RelativesCRC PressBoca Raton487521
    Google Scholar
  8. Heithaus, M. R. 2005Habitat use and group size of pied cormorants (Phalacrocorax varius) in a seagrass ecosystem: possible effects of food abundance and predation riskMarine Biology1472735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heupel, M. R., Hueter, R. E. 2002Importance of prey density in relation to the movement patterns of juvenile blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) within a coastal nursery areaMarine and Freshwater Research53543550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hugie, D. M., Dill, L. M. 1994Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and preyJournal of Fish Biology45151169Google Scholar
  11. Light, S. S., Dineen, J. W. 1994

    Water control in the Everglades: a historical perspective

    Ogden, J. C. eds. Everglades: The Ecosystem and its RestorationSt. Lucie PressDelray Beach, Florida4784
    Google Scholar
  12. Matheson, R. E. J., Camp, D. K., Sogard, S. M., Bjorgo, K. A. 1999Changes in seagrass-associated fish and crustacean communities in Florida Bay mud banks: the effects of recent ecosystem changes?Estuaries22534551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McPherson, B. E. & R. B. Halley, 1996. The South Florida Environment – A Region under Stress. Circular 1134, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehlum, F., Hunt, G. L.,Jr., Klusek, Z., Decker, M. B. 1999Scale-dependent correlations between the abundance of Brünnich’s guillemots and their preyJournal of Animal Ecology686072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morrissey, J. F., Gruber, S. H. 1993Home range of juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostrisCopeia2425434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogden, J. C., Browder, J. A., Gentile, J. H., Gunderson, L. H., Fennema, R., Wang, J. 1999Environmental management scenarios: ecological implicationUrban Ecosystems3279303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Robblee, M. B., Barber, T. R., Carlson, P. R.,Jr., Durako, M., Fourqurean, J.W., Muehlstein, L. K., Porter, D., Yarbro, L. A., Zieman, R. T., Zieman, J. C. 1991Mass mortality of tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum in Florida Bay (USA)Marine Ecology Progress Series71297299Google Scholar
  18. Rudnick, D. T., Chen, Z., Childers, D. L., Boyer, J. N., Fontaine, T. D.,III 1999Phosphorus and nitrogen inputs to Florida Bay: the importance of the Everglades watershedEstuaries22398416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sih, A 1984The behavioral response race of predators and preyAmerican Naturalist123143150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simpfendorfer, C. A., Gotreid, A. B., McAuley, R. B. 2001Size, sex, and geographic variation in the diet of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, from Western Australian watersEnvironmental Biology of Fishes613746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sims, D. W., Quayle, V. A. 1998Selective foraging behaviour of basking sharks on zooplankton in a small-scale frontNature393460464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sogard, S. M., Powell, G. V. N., Holmquist, J. G. 1989Spatial distribution and trends in abundance of fishes residing in seagrass meadows on Florida Bay mudbanksBulletin of Marine Science44179199Google Scholar
  23. Thayer, G. W., Chester, A. J. 1989Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida BayBulletin of Marine Science44200219Google Scholar
  24. Thayer, G. W., Powell, G. V. N., Hoss, D. E. 1999Composition of larval, juvenile, and small adult fishes relative to changes in environmental conditions in Florida BayEstuaries22518533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weatherbee, W. M., Cortes, E. 2004

    Food consumption and feeding habits

    Carrier, J. C.Musick, J. A.Heithaus, M. R. eds. Biology of Sharks and their RelativesCRC PressBoca Raton225246
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leigh  G. Torres
    • 1
  • Michael  R. Heithaus
    • 2
  • Bryan Delius
    • 2
  1. 1.Duke University Marine LaboratoryBeaufortUSA
  2. 2.Marine Biology Program Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityNorth MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations