, Volume 569, Issue 1, pp 5–22 | Cite as

Characteristics of surface-water flows in the ridge and slough landscape of Everglades National Park: implications for particulate transport

  • Lynn Leonard
  • Alexander Croft
  • Daniel Childers
  • Sherry Mitchell-Bruker
  • Helena Solo-Gabriele
  • Michael Ross


Over the last one hundred years, compartmentalization and water management activities have reduced water flow to the ridge and slough landscape of the Everglades. As a result, the once corrugated landscape has become topographically and vegetationally uniform. The focus of this study was to quantify variation in surface flow in the ridge and slough landscape and to relate flow conditions to particulate transport and deposition. Over the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 wet seasons, surface velocities and particulate accumulation were measured in upper Shark River Slough in Everglades National Park. Landscape characteristics such as elevation, plant density and biomass also were examined to determine their impact on flow characteristics and material transport. The results of this study demonstrate that the release of water during the wet season not only increases water levels, but also increased flow speeds and particulate transport and availability. Further, flow speeds were positively and significantly correlated with water level thereby enhancing particulate transport in sloughs relative to ridges especially during peak flow periods. Our results also indicate that the distribution of biomass in the water column, including floating plants and periphyton, affects velocity magnitude and shape of vertical profiles, especially in the sloughs where Utricularia spp. and periphyton mats are more abundant. Plot clearing experiments suggest that the presence of surface periphyton and Utricularia exert greater control over flow characteristics than the identity (i.e., sawgrass or spike rush) or density of emergent macrophytes, two parameters frequently incorporated into models describing flow through vegetated canopies. Based on these results, we suggest that future modeling efforts must take the presence of floating biomass, such as Utricularia, and presence of periphyton into consideration when describing particulate transport.


flow slough Everglades hydrodynamics spike rush sawgrass 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bazante, J. H. M., H. Solo-Gabriele, M. Ross, D. Childers, S. Mitchell-Bruker & L. Leonard, 2003. Water velocity and suspended solids concentrations in the proximity of tree islands in Everglades National Park. Proceedings of the Joint Conference on the Science and Restoration of the Greater Everglades and Florida Bay Ecosystem, “From Kissimmee to the Keys”. April 13–18, 2003. Palm Harbor, Florida, 19–20.Google Scholar
  2. Childers, D. L., J. N. Boyer, S. E. Davis III, C. J. Madden, D. T. Rudnick & F. H. Sklar, 2005. Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentration patterns in the oligotrophic “upside down” estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnology and Oceanography 51(1, part2): 602-616.Google Scholar
  3. Chimney, M. J., Goforth, G. 2001Environmental impacts to the Everglades ecosystem: a historical perspective and restoration strategiesWater Science and Technology4493100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Christiansen, T., Wiberg, P. L., Milligan, T. G. 2000Flow and sediment transport on a tidal salt marsh surfaceEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science50315331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvey, J. W., Saiers, J. E., Newlin, J. T. 2005Solute transport and storage mechanisms in wetlands of the Everglades, south FloridaWater Resources Research41114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jadhav, R. S., Buchberger, S. G. 1995Effects of vegetation on flow through free water surface wetlandsEcological Engineering5481496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kundu, P. K. 1990Fluid MechanicsAcademic PressSan DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Kushlan, J. A. 1993Freshwater wetlandsDennison, M. S.Berry, J. F. eds. Wetlands: Guide to Science, Law, and TechnologyNoyes PublicationsPark Ridge, NJ74127Google Scholar
  9. Lee, J. K., Roig, L. C., Jenter, H. L., Visser, H. M. 2004Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida EvergladesEcological Engineering22237248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leonard, L. A. 1997Controls of sediment transport and deposition in an incised mainland marsh basin, southeastern North CarolinaWetlands17263274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leonard, L. A., Hine, A. C., Luther, M. E. 1995Surficial sediment transport and deposition processes in a Juncus roemerianus marsh, West-central FloridaJournal of Coastal Research11322336Google Scholar
  12. Leonard, L. A., Luther, M. E. 1995Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopiesLimnology and Oceanography4014741484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonard, L. A., Reed, D. J. 2002Hydrodynamics and sediment transport through tidal marsh canopiesJournal of Coastal Research SI36459469Google Scholar
  14. Light, S.S, Dineen, J. W. 1994Water control in the Everglades: A historical perspectiveDavis, S. M.Ogden, J. C. eds. Everglades: The Ecosysten and its RestorationSt Lucie PressDelray Beach, FL4784Google Scholar
  15. Loveless, C. M. 1959A study of the vegetation in the Florida EvergladesEcology4019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell-Bruker, S., Bazante, J., Childers, D., Leonard, L., Ross, M., Solo-Gabriele, H., Snow, R., Stothoff, S. 2005Effect of Hydrology on Everglades Ridge and Slough CommunityReport to Everglades National ParkHomestead, FLGoogle Scholar
  17. Nepf, H. M. 1999Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetationWater Resources Research35479489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nepf, H. M., Sullivan, J. A., Zavistoski, R. A. 1997A model for diffusion within emergent vegetationLimnology and Oceanography4217351745Google Scholar
  19. Neumeier, U., Ciavola, P. 2004Flow resistance and associated sedimentary processes in a Spartina maritima salt marshJournal of Coastal Research20435447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saiers, J. E., Harvey, J. W., Mylon, S. E. 2003Surface-water transport of suspended matter through wetland vegetation of the Florida EvergladesGeophysical Research Letters3015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Science Coordination Team (SCT), 2003. The Role of Flow in the Everglades Ridge and Slough Landscape. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Working Group. Approved by the SCT: January 14, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Shelton, M. L. 1990Surface-water flow to Everglades National ParkGeographical Review80355369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi, Z., Pethick, J. S., Pye, K. 1995Flow structure in and above the various heights of a saltmarsh canopy: a laboratory flume studyJournal of Coastal Research1112041209Google Scholar
  24. Stern, D. A., Khanbilvardi, R., Alair, J. C., Richardson, W. 2001Description of flow through a natural wetland using dye tracer testsEcological Engineering18173184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stumpf, R. P. 1983The process of sedimentation on the surface of a salt marshEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science17495508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabb, D. 1990Hydroperiod Conditions of Key Environmental Indicators of Everglades National Park and Adjacent East Everglades Area as Guide to Selection of an Optimum Water Plan for Everglades National Park, FloridaTropical BioIndustries, Inc.MiamiGoogle Scholar
  27. Vermaat, J. E., Santamaria, L., Roos, P. J. 2000Water flow across and sediment trapping by submerged macrophyte beds of contrasting growth formArchiv für Hydrobiologie148549562Google Scholar
  28. Wood, A., 2005. Dynamics of detrital particulate organic material in the ridge and slough landscape of the Everglades. Masters Thesis, Florida International University.Google Scholar
  29. Wu, F. C., Shen, H. W., Chou, Y. J. 1999Variation of roughness for unsubmerged and submerged vegetationJournal of Hydraulic Engineering125934942CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn Leonard
    • 1
  • Alexander Croft
    • 1
  • Daniel Childers
    • 2
  • Sherry Mitchell-Bruker
    • 3
  • Helena Solo-Gabriele
    • 4
  • Michael Ross
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Marine ScienceUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Everglades National ParkHomesteadUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations