Hydrobiologia

, Volume 572, Issue 1, pp 71–87

Benthic Metabolism as an Indicator of Stream Ecosystem Health

  • Christine S. Fellows
  • Joanne E. Clapcott
  • James W. Udy
  • Stuart E. Bunn
  • Bronwyn D. Harch
  • Michael J. Smith
  • Peter M. Davies
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-9001-6

Cite this article as:
Fellows, C.S., Clapcott, J.E., Udy, J.W. et al. Hydrobiologia (2006) 572: 71. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-9001-6

Abstract

We tested direct and indirect measures of benthic metabolism as indicators of stream ecosystem health across a known agricultural land-use disturbance gradient in southeast Queensland, Australia. Gross primary production (GPP) and respiration (R24) in benthic chambers in cobble and sediment habitats, algal biomass (as chlorophyll a) from cobbles and sediment cores, algal biomass accrual on artificial substrates and stable carbon isotope ratios of aquatic plants and benthic sediments were measured at 53 stream sites, ranging from undisturbed subtropical rainforest to catchments where improved pasture and intensive cropping are major land-uses. Rates of benthic GPP and R24 varied by more than two orders of magnitude across the study gradient. Generalised linear regression modelling explained 80% or more of the variation in these two indicators when sediment and cobble substrate dominated sites were considered separately, and both catchment and reach scale descriptors of the disturbance gradient were important in explaining this variation. Model fits were poor for net daily benthic metabolism (NDM) and production to respiration ratio (P/R). Algal biomass accrual on artificial substrate and stable carbon isotope ratios of aquatic plants and benthic sediment were the best of the indirect indicators, with regression model R2 values of 50% or greater. Model fits were poor for algal biomass on natural substrates for cobble sites and all sites. None of these indirect measures of benthic metabolism was a good surrogate for measured GPP. Direct measures of benthic metabolism, GPP and R24, and several indirect measures were good indicators of stream ecosystem health and are recommended in assessing process-related responses to riparian and catchment land use change and the success of ecosystem rehabilitation actions.

Keywords

primary production respiration stable isotopes chlorophyll catchment disturbance 

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine S. Fellows
    • 1
  • Joanne E. Clapcott
    • 1
    • 4
  • James W. Udy
    • 1
    • 5
  • Stuart E. Bunn
    • 1
  • Bronwyn D. Harch
    • 2
  • Michael J. Smith
    • 1
  • Peter M. Davies
    • 3
  1. 1.Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine LandscapesGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Mathematical and Information SciencesSt. LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource ManagementThe University of Western AustraliaAlbanyAustralia
  4. 4.School of ZoologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  5. 5.Centre for Water StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations