Hydrobiologia

, Volume 565, Issue 1, pp 289–308

Redefinition and Elaboration of River Ecosystem Health: Perspective for River Management

  • P. Vugteveen
  • R. S. E. W. Leuven
  • M. A. J. Huijbregts
  • H. J. R. Lenders
Article

Abstract

This paper critically reviews developments in the conceptualization and elaboration of the River Ecosystem Health (REH) concept. Analysis of literature shows there is still no consistent meaning of the central concept Ecosystem Health, resulting in models (i.e. elaborations) that have unclear and insufficient conceptual grounds. Furthermore, a diverse terminology is associated with describing REH, resulting in confusion with other concepts. However, if the concept is to have merit and longevity in the field of river research and management, unambiguous definition of the conceptual meaning and operational domain are required. Therefore a redefinition is proposed, based on identified characteristics of health and derived from considering semantic and conceptual definitions. Based on this definition, REH has merit in a broader context of river system health that considers societal functioning next to ecological functioning. Assessment of health needs integration of measures of multiple, complementary attributes and analysis in a synthesized way. An assessment framework is proposed that assesses REH top-down as well as bottom up by combining indicators of system stress responses (i.e. condition) with indicators identifying the causative stress (i.e. stressor). The scope of REH is covered by using indicators of system activity, metabolism (vigour), resilience, structure and interactions between system components (organization). The variety of stress effects that the system may endure are covered by using biotic, chemical as well as physical stressors. Besides having a unique meaning, the REH metaphor has added value to river management by being able to mobilize scientists, practitioners and publics and seeing relationships at the level of values. It places humans at the centre of the river ecosystem, while seeking to ensure the durability of the ecosystem of which they are an integral part. Optimization of the indicator set, development of aggregation and classification methodologies, and implementation of the concept within differing international frames are considered main aims for future research.

Keywords

condition indicators ecological integrity ecosystem functioning ecosystem organization stressor indicators sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allesina, S., Ulanowicz, R. E. 2004Cycling in ecological networks: Finn’s index revisitedComputational Biology and Chemistry28227233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An, K. -G., Park, S. S., Shin, J. -Y. 2002An evaluation of a river health using the index of biological integrity along with relations to chemical and habitat conditionsEnvironment International28411420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council1992Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters, National Water Quality Management StrategyAustralian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation CouncilCanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayne, B. L. 1987The Effects of Stress and Pollution on Marine AnimalsPraegerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Belaousoff, S., Kevan, P. G. 2003Are there ecological foundations for ecosystem health?The Environmentalist23255263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. 2002Investing in river healthWater Science and Technology458590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bij de Vaate, A., Jazdzewski, K., Ketelaars, H. A. M., Gollasch, S., Velde, G. 2002Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in EuropeCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences5911591174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BKH, 1994. Chemische waterkwaliteitsindices: internationale inventarisatie van technieken en methodieken voor aggregatie en presentatie van chemische waterkwaliteitsgegevens. RO190101/5818L/R5. BKH Adviesbureau, Delft (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  9. Boon, P. J. 1998River restoration in five dimensionsAquatic conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems8257264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boon, P. J. 2000The development of integrated methods for assessing river condition valueHydrobiologia422/423413428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boulton, A. J. 1999An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and diagnosisFreshwater Biology41469479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brouwer, R., Georgiou, S., Turner, R. K. 2003Integrated assessment and sustainable water and wetland managementA review of concepts and methods. Integrated Assessment4172184Google Scholar
  13. Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A., Tozer, R. G. 1970A water quality index – do we dare?Water and Sewage Works117339343Google Scholar
  14. Bunn, S. E., Davies, P. M., Mosch, T. D. 1999Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradationFreshwater Biology41333345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callicot, J. B., Crowder, J. B., Mumford, K. 1999Current normative concepts in conservationConservation Biology132235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calow, P. 1995

    Ecosystem health – a critical analysis of concepts

    Rapport, D. J.Gaudet, C.Calow, P. eds. Evaluating and Monitoring the Health of Large-scale EcosystemsSpringer-VerlagBerlin3341
    Google Scholar
  17. Costanza, R., Patten, B. C. 1995Defining and predicting sustainabilityEcological Economics15193196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costanza, R., Mageau, M. 1999What is a healthy ecosystem?Aquatic Ecology33105115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costanza, R.Norton, B.Haskell, B. J. eds. 1992Ecosystem Health – New Goals for Environmental ManagementIsland PressWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., Belt, M. 1997The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capitalNature387253260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Couillard, D., Lefebvre, Y. 1985Analysis of water quality indicesJournal of Environmental Management21161179Google Scholar
  22. Davis, M. A., Slobodkin, L. B. 2004The science and values of restoration ecologyRestoration Ecology1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC, Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  24. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. U.S Environmental Protection Agency EPA/630/R-95/002F, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  25. Fairweather, P. G. 1999State of environment indicators of ‘river health’: exploring the metaphorFreshwater Biology41211220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forget, G., Lebel, J. 2001An ecosystem approach to human healthInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health7336Google Scholar
  27. Hart, B. T., Maher, B., Lawrence, I. 1999New generation water quality guidelines for ecosystem protectionFreshwater Biology41347359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, J. 2001The natural economyNature413463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hering, D., Moog, O., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P. F. M. 2004Overview and application of the AQEM assessment systemHydrobiologia516120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill, M. O. 1973Diversity and eveness: a unifying notation and its consequencesEcology54427432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hohls, D. R., 1996. National Biomonitoring Programme for Riverine Ecosystems: Framework Document for the Programme. NBP Report Series No. 1, Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  32. Holling, C. S. 1973Resilience and stability of ecological systemsAnnual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics4123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling, C. S. 1987Simplifying the complex: the paradigms of ecological function and structureEuropean Journal of Operational Restoration30139146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holling, C. S. 2001Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systemsEcosystems4390405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Innis, S. A., Naiman, R. J., Elliot, S. R. 2000Indicators and assessment methods for measuring the ecological integrity of semi-aquatic terrestrial environmentsHydrobiologia422/423111131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jørgensen, S. E. 1995Exergy and ecological buffer capacities as measures of ecosystem healthEcosystem Health1150160Google Scholar
  37. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bailey & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river floodplain systems. In Dodge, D. P. (ed.), Proceedings of the Internationals Large River Symposium (LARS). Canadian Special Publications of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.Google Scholar
  38. Karr, J. R. 1991Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource managementEcological Applications16684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karr, J. R. 1999Defining and measuring river healthFreshwater Biology41221234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klepper, O., Bakker, J., Traas, T. P., Meent, D. 1998Mapping the Potentially Affected Fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regionsJournal of Hazardous Materials61337344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuiper, J. 1998Landscape quality based upon diversity, coherence and continuity. Landscape planning at different planning-levels in the River area of the NetherlandsLandscape and Urban Planning4391104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lackey, R. T. 2001Values, policy, and ecosystem healthBioScience51437443Google Scholar
  43. Lenders, H. J. R., 2003. Environmental rehabilitation of the river landscape in the Netherlands. A blend of five dimensions. Ph.D.-thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  44. Lenders, H. J. R., Knippenberg, L. 2005The temporal and social dimensions of river rehabilitation: towards a multi-dimensional research perspectiveArchiv für Hydrobiologie (Large Rivers Supplement)155/15119131Google Scholar
  45. Leuven, R. S. E. W., Poudevigne, I. 2002Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessmentFreshwater Biology47845865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leuven, R. S. E. W., Haans, J. L. M., Hendriks, A. J., Lock, R. A. C., Wendelaar Bonga, S. E. 1998

    Assessing cumulative impacts of multiple stressors on river systems

    Nienhuis, P. H.Leuven, R. S. E. W.Ragas, A. M. J. eds. New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River BasinsBackhuys PublishersLeiden241259
    Google Scholar
  47. Leuven, R. S. E. W., Smits, A. J. M., Nienhuis, P. H. 2000

    From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin management

    Smits, A. J. M.Nienhuis, P. H.Leuven, R. S. E. W. eds. New Approaches to River ManagementBackhuys PublishersLeiden329347
    Google Scholar
  48. Maddock, I. 1999The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river healthFreshwater Biology41373391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mageau, M. T., Costanza, R., Ulanowicz, R. E. 1998Quantifying the trends expected in developing ecosystemsEcological Modelling112122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maher, W., Batley, G. E., Lawrence, I. 1999Assessing the health of sediment ecosystems: use of chemical measurementsFreshwater Biology41361372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. May, R. M. 1977Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable statesNature269471477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mekong River Commission, 2003. Annual Report. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh (available online www.mrcmekong.org).Google Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. L. 1997Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecologyJournal of the North American Benthological Society16439447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miltner, R. J., Rankin, E. T. 1998Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streamsFreshwater Biology40145158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moog, O., Chovanec, A. 2000Assessing the ecological integrity of rivers: walking the line among ecological, political and administrative interestsHydrobiologia422/42399109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Naveh, Z. 2001Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapesLandscape and Urban Planning57269284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nienhuis, P. H., Leuven, R. S. E. W. 1998

    Ecological concepts for the sustainable management of lowland river basins: a review

    Nienhuis, P. H.Leuven, R. S. E. W.Ragas, A. M. J. eds. New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River BasinsBackhuys PublishersLeiden733
    Google Scholar
  58. Norris, R. H., Thoms, M. C. 1999What is river health?Freshwater Biology41197209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norris, R. H., Hawkins, C. P. 2000Monitoring river healthHydrobiologia435517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oberdorff, T., Pont, D., Hugueny, B., Porcher, J. P. 2002Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of ‘river health’ in FranceFreshwater Biology4717201734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Odum, E. P. 1969The strategy of ecosystem developmentScience164262270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Odum, E. P. 1985Trends expected in stressed ecosystemsBioscience35419422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickett, J. P. eds. 2000The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language4Houghton Mifflin CompanyBostonGoogle Scholar
  64. Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, L. 2002The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphorEcosystems5110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pickett, S. T. A, Burch, W. R.,Jr, Foresman, T. W., Grove, J. M., Rowntree, R. 1997A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystemsUrban Ecosystems1185199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pimm, S. L. 1984The complexity and stability of ecosystemsNature307321326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D. 1995Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variabilityEcology76606627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pollard, P., Huxham, M. 1998The European Water Framework Directive: a new era in the management of aquatic ecosystem health?Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems8773792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Poudevigne, I., Alard, D., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Nienhuis, P. H. 2002A system approach to river restoration: a case study in the lower Seine valley, FranceRiver Research and Applications18239247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rankin, E. T. 1989The qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI): rationale, methods, and applicationDivision of Water Quality Planning & Assessment, Ecological Assessment SectionColumbusGoogle Scholar
  71. Rapport, D. J., Regier, H. A., Hutchinson, T. C. 1985Ecosystem behavior under stressAmerican Naturalist125617640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rapport, D. J., Costanza, R., McMichael, A. J. 1998aAssessing ecosystem health: challenges at the interface of social, natural and health sciencesTrends in Ecology and Evolution13397402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rapport, D. J., Gaudet, C., Karr, J. R., Baron, J. S., Bohlen, C., Jackson, W., Jones, B., Naiman, R. J., Norton, B., Pollock, M. M. 1998bEvaluating landscape health: interacting societal goals and biophysical processJournal of Environmental Management53115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rapport, D. J., Böhm, G., Buckingham, D., Cairns, J.,Jr., Costanza, R., Karr, J. R., Kruijf, H. A. M., Levins, R., McMichael, A. J., Nielsen, N. O., Whitford, W. G. 1999Ecosystem health: the concept, the ISEH, and the important tasks aheadEcosystem Health58290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., Braun, D. P. 1996A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystemsConservation Biology1011631174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., Braun, D. P. 1997How much water does a river need?Freshwater Biology37231249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ripl, W., Pokorný, J., Eiseltová, M., Ridgill, S. 1994A holistic approach to the structure and function of wetlands and their degradationInternational Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau Publication321635Google Scholar
  78. Rogers, K., Biggs, H. 1999Integrating indicators, endpoints and value systems in strategic management of the rivers of the Kruger National ParkFreshwater Biology41439451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simberloff, D. 1998Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era?Biological Conservation93247257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simpson, E. H. 1949Measurements of diversityNature163688Google Scholar
  81. Society for Ecological Restoration Science & Policy Working Group (SER), 2004. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration (available online www.ser.org).Google Scholar
  82. Tansley, A. G. 1935The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and termsEcology16284307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tennant, D. L. 1976Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resourcesFisheries1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tockner, K., Malard, F., Ward, J. V. 2000An extension of the flood pulse conceptHydrological Processes1428612883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Townsend, C. R., Riley, R. H. 1999Assessment of river health: accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological spaceFreshwater Biology41393405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Traas, T. P., Meent, D., Posthuma, L., Hamers, T. H. M., Kater, B. J., Zwart, D., Aldenberg, T. 2002

    Potentially affected fraction as measure of toxic pressure on ecosystems

    Posthuma, L.Suter, G. W.,IITrass , T. P. eds. Species Sensitivity Distributions in EcotoxicologyLewis PublishersBoca Raton315344
    Google Scholar
  87. Turner, M. G., Costanza, R., Sklar, F. H. 1989Methods to compare spatial patterns for landscape modelling and analysisEcological Modelling48118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ulanowicz, R. E. 1986Growth and development: ecosystems phenomenologySpringer-VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. Van der Velde, G., R. S. E. W. Leuven & I. Nagelkerken, 2004. Types of river ecosystems. 2.7.2.4. In Dooge, J. C. I. (ed.), Fresh Surface Water, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). EOLSS Publishers, Oxford (available online www.eolss.net).Google Scholar
  90. Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., Cushin, C. E. 1980The river continuum conceptCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences37130137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ward, J. V., Stanford, J. A. 1995The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers – regulated riversResearch and Management10159168Google Scholar
  92. Ward, J. V., Robinson, C. T., Tockner, K. 2002Applicability of ecological theory to riverine ecosystemsVerhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie26443450Google Scholar
  93. Wells, P. G. 2003Assessing health of the Bay of Fundy – concepts and frameworkMarine Pollution Bulletin4610591077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wichert, G. A., Rapport, D. J. 1998Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basinEnvironmental Management22425443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. World Commission on Environment and Development1987Our Common FutureOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  96. Xu, F. -L., Jørgensen, S. E., Tao, S. 1999Ecological indicators for assessing freshwater ecosystem healthEcological Modelling11677106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Xu, F. -L., Tao, S., Dawson, R. W., Li, P. -G., Cao, J. 2001Lake ecosystem health assessmentWater Research3531573167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Young, R. G., C. R. Townsend & C. D. Matthaei, 2004. Functional indicators of river ecosystem health – an interim guide for use in New Zealand. Report 870, Cawthron Institute, Nelson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vugteveen
    • 1
  • R. S. E. W. Leuven
    • 1
  • M. A. J. Huijbregts
    • 1
  • H. J. R. Lenders
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Studies, Institute for Wetland and Water Research, Faculty of ScienceRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations