Hydrobiologia

, Volume 563, Issue 1, pp 109–123

The Distribution of Benthic and Hyporheic Macroinvertebrates from the Heads and Tails of Riffles

  • John Davy-Bowker
  • Wayne Sweeting
  • Nicole Wright
  • Ralph T. Clarke
  • Sean Arnott
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

The spatial distribution of benthic (up to 0.05 m depth) and hyporheic (0.25 and 0.5 m depth) macroinvertebrates from downwelling zones at the heads of riffles and upwelling zones at the tails of riffles was examined in two studies on a 4th order chalk stream in Dorset, England. In the first study, differences in benthic and hyporheic macroinvertebrate community composition between the head and tail of a single riffle were investigated. In the second study, a replicated design involving eight riffles was used to compare benthic and hyporheic macroinvertebrate community composition both between heads and tails of the same riffles and between riffles. In the first (single riffle) study there were significantly higher mean numbers of benthic invertebrates and families at the riffle head (715 individuals and 13.8 families per 0.0225 m2) compared to the tail (192 individuals and 8.7 families). ANOSIM analysis also showed that the community structure of head and tail benthic samples was significantly different. In the second (replicated riffle) study, there were also significantly more benthic invertebrates at riffle heads (\(\bar{x}\) = 594 per 0.0225 m2) compared to tails (\(\bar{x}\) = 417 per 0.0225 m2), although this was not the case for families, and community structure also differed significantly between riffle heads and tails. In contrast, in the hyporheic zone, there were no significant differences between the total numbers of invertebrates in the riffle heads and tails, or between riffles, although a significant difference in family richness between riffle head and tail samples was identified in the first study. Community analysis revealed progressively poorer separation of riffle head and tail samples at 0.25 m and 0.5 m hyporheic depths. Whilst being able to identify clear differences in benthic communities from riffles heads and tails, the physically heterogeneous nature of the riffle habitats studied made it difficult to account for the consistent differences in macroinvertebrate communities observed with the physical variables measured.

Keywords

macroinvertebrates benthic hyporheic riffle upwelling downwelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beisel J.-N., Usseglio-Polatera P., Thomas S. and Moreteau J.-C. (1998). Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389: 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bencala K. E. (1993). A perspective on stream catchment connections. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bou C. and Rouch R. (1967). Un nouveau champ de recherches sur la faune aquatique souterainne. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences Paris 265: 369–370Google Scholar
  4. Boulton A. J. (1993). Stream ecology and surface–hyporheic hydrologic exchange: implications, techniques and limitations. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 44: 553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulton A. J., Dole-Olivier M.-J. and Marmonier P. (2003). Optimizing a sampling strategy for assessing hyporheic invertebrate biodiversity using the Bou-Rouch method: within-site replication and sample volume. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 156: 431–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulton A. J., Dole-Olivier M.-J. and Marmonier P. (2004). Effects of sample volume and taxonomic resolution on assessment of hyporheic assemblage composition sampled using a Bou-Rouch pump. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 159: 327–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton A. J. and Foster J. G. (1998). Effects of buried leaf litter and vertical hydrologic exchange on hyporheic water chemistry and fauna in a gravel-bed river in northern New South Wales, Australia. Freshwater Biology 40: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulton A. J. and Stanley E. H. (1995). Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream. II. Faunal dynamics. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 134: 27–52Google Scholar
  9. Bray J. R. and Curtis J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of the southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunke M. and Gonser T. (1997). The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claret C., Marmonier P., Boissier J. M., Fontvieille D. and Blanc P. (1997). Nutrient transfer between parafluvial interstitial water and river water: influence of gravel bar heterogeneity. Freshwater Biology 37: 657–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke K. R. and Gorley R. N. (2001). PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman R. L. and Dahm C. N. (1990). Stream geomorphology: effects on periphyton standing crop and primary production. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9: 293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dent L. C., Grimm N. B. and Fisher S. G. (2001). Multiscale effects of surface–subsurface exchange on stream water nutrient concentrations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 162–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dole-Olivier M.-J. and Marmonier P. (1992). Patch distribution of interstitial communities: prevailing factors. Freshwater Biology 27: 177–191Google Scholar
  16. Dunne T. and Leopold L. B. (1978). Water in Environmental Planning. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans E. C. and Petts G. E. (1997). Hyporheic temperature patterns within riffles. Hydrological Sciences-Journal-des Sciences Hydrologiques 42: 199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Findlay S. (1995). Importance of surface–subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: the hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography 40: 159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fortner S. L. and White D. S. (1988). Interstitial water patterns: a factor influencing the distributions of some lotic aquatic vascular macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 31: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franken R. J. M., Storey R. G. and Williams D. D. (2001). Biological, chemical and physical characteristics of down-welling and up-welling zones in the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Hydrobiologia 444: 183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser B. G. and Williams D. D. (1997). Accuracy and precision in sampling hyporheic fauna. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1135–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimm N. B. and Fisher S. G. (1984). Exchange between interstitial and surface water: implications for stream metabolism and nutrient cycling. Hydrobiologia 111: 219–228Google Scholar
  23. Grimm N. B., Valett H. M., Stanley E. H. and Fisher S. G. (1991). Contribution of the hyporheic zone to stability of an arid-land stream. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 1595–1599Google Scholar
  24. Hendricks S. P. (1993). Microbial ecology of the hyporheic zone: a perspective integrating hydrology and biology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 6: 85–91Google Scholar
  25. Hendricks S. P. (1996). Bacterial biomass, activity and production within the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 136: 467–487Google Scholar
  26. Huggenberger P., Hoehn E., Beschta R. and Woessner W. (1998). Abiotic aspects of channels and floodplains in riparian ecology. Freshwater Biology 40: 407–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones J. B., Fisher S. G. and Grimm N. B. (1995a). Vertical hydrological exchange and ecosystem metabolism in a Sonoran Desert Stream. Ecology 76: 942–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones J. B., Fisher S. G. and Grimm N. B. (1995b). Nitrification in the hyporheic zone of a desert stream ecosystem. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14: 249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maddock I. P., Petts G. E., Evans E. C. and Greenwood M. T. (1996). Assessing river–aquifer interactions within the hyporheic zone. In: Brown, A. G. (eds) Geomorphology and Groundwater, pp 53–74. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  30. Malard F., Ferreira D., Dolédec S. and Ward J. V. (2003). Influence of groundwater upwelling on the distribution of the hyporheos in a headwater river flood plain. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 157: 89–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murray-Bligh J. A. D., Furse M. T., Jones F. H., Gunn R. J. M., Dines R. A. and Wright J. F. (1997). Procedure for collecting and analysing macro-invertebrate samples for RIVPACS. Institute of Freshwater Ecology, & Environment Agency, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Olsen D. A. and Townsend C. R. (2003). Hyporheic community composition in a gravel-bed stream: the influence of vertical hydrological exchange, sediment structure and physicohemistry. Freshwater Biology 48: 1363–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer M. A. (1993). Experimentation in the hyporheic zone: challenges and prospectus. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pepin D. M. and Hauer F. R. (2002). Benthic responses to groundwater–surface water exchange in 2 alluvial rivers in northwestern Montana. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 370–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plenet S., Gibert J. and Marmonier P. (1995). Biotic and abiotic interactions between surface and interstitial systems in rivers. Ecography 18: 296–309Google Scholar
  36. Quinn J. M. and Hickey C. W. (1994). Hydraulic parameters and benthic invertebrate distributions in two gravel-bed New Zealand rivers. Freshwater Biology 32: 489–500Google Scholar
  37. Resh V. H. (2001). Interstitial invertebrate assemblages associated with small-scale subsurface flowpaths in perennial and intermittent California streams. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 150: 629–640Google Scholar
  38. Savant S. A., Reible D. D. and Thibodeaux L. J. (1987). Convective transport within stable river sediments. Water Research 23: 1763–1768Google Scholar
  39. Scarsbrook M. R. and Halliday J. (2002). Detecting patterns in hyporheic community structure: does sampling method alter the story?. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 36: 443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sear D. A., Armitage P. D. and Dawson F. H. (1999). Groundwater dominated rivers. Hydrological Processes 13: 255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanford J. A. and Ward J. V. (1988). The hyporheic habitat of river ecosystems. Nature 355: 64–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanley E. H. and Boulton A. J. (1995). Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream. I. Hydrologic and chemical dynamics. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 134: 1–26Google Scholar
  43. Strahler A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow, V. T. (eds) Handbook of Applied Hydrology, pp 4–39. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Sterba O., Uvira V., Mathur P. and Rulik M. (1992). Variations in the hyporheic zone through a riffle in the R. Morava, Czechoslovakia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 7: 31–43Google Scholar
  45. Thibodeaux L. J. and Boyle J. D. (1987). Bedform-generated convective transport in bottom sediment. Nature 325: 341–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Triska F. J., Kennedy V. C., Avanzino R. J., Zellweger G. W. and Bencala K. E. (1989). Retention and transport of nutrients in a third-order stream in northwestern California: hyporheic processes. Ecology 70: 1893–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valett H. M. (1993). Surface–hyporheic interactions in a Sonoran Desert stream: hydrologic exchange and diel periodicity. Hydrobiologia 259: 133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valett H. M., Fisher S. G., Grimm N. B. and Camill P. (1994). Vertical hydrological exchange and stability of a desert stream ecosystem. Ecology 75: 548–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valett H. M., Fisher S. G. and Stanley E. H. (1990). Physical and chemical characteristics of the hyporheic zone of a Sonoran Desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9: 201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vaux W. G. (1968). Intragravel flow and interchange of water in a streambed. Fishery Bulletin 66: 479–489Google Scholar
  51. White D. S., Elzinga C. H. and Hendricks S. P. (1987). Temperature patterns within the hyporheic zone of a northern Michigan river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 6: 85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Davy-Bowker
    • 1
  • Wayne Sweeting
    • 2
  • Nicole Wright
    • 3
  • Ralph T. Clarke
    • 1
  • Sean Arnott
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & HydrologyWinfrith Technology CentreDorchester, DorsetUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of WalesBangor, GwyneddUK
  3. 3.Department of GeographySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations