Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 563, Issue 1, pp 45–60 | Cite as

Different Surrounding Landscapes may Result in Different Fish Assemblages in East African Seagrass Beds

  • M. Dorenbosch
  • M. G. G. Grol
  • I. Nagelkerken
  • G. van der Velde
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Few studies have considered how seagrass fish assemblages are influenced by surrounding habitats. This information is needed for a better understanding of the connectivity between tropical coastal ecosystems. To study the effects of surrounding habitats on the composition, diversity and densities of coral reef fish species on seagrass beds, underwater visual census surveys were carried out in two seagrass habitat types at various locations along the coast of Zanzibar (Tanzania) in the western Indian Ocean. Fish assemblages of seagrass beds in a marine embayment with large areas of mangroves (bay seagrasses) situated 9 km away from coral reefs were compared with those of seagrass beds situated on the continental shelf adjacent to coral reefs (reef seagrasses). No differences in total fish density, total species richness or total juvenile fish density and species richness were observed between the two seagrass habitat types. However, at species level, nine species showed significantly higher densities in bay seagrasses, while eight other species showed significantly higher densities in reef seagrasses. Another four species were exclusively observed in bay seagrasses. Since seagrass complexity could not be related to these differences, it is suggested that the arrangement of seagrass beds in the surrounding landscape (i.e. the arrangement on the continental shelf adjacent to the coral reef, or the arrangement in an embayment with mangroves situated away from reefs) has a possible effect on the occurrence of various reef-associated fish species on seagrass beds. Fish migration from or to the seagrass beds and recruitment and settlement patterns of larvae possibly explain these observations. Juvenile fish densities were similar in the two types of seagrass habitats indicating that seagrass beds adjacent to coral reefs also function as important juvenile habitats, even though they may be subject to higher levels of predation. On the contrary, the density and species richness of adult fish was significantly higher on reef seagrasses than on bay seagrasses, indicating that proximity to the coral reef increases density of adult fish on reef seagrasses, and/or that ontogenetic shifts to the reef may reduce adult density on bay seagrasses.

Keywords

coral reef fishes seagrass beds mangroves nursery connectivity migration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atema J., Kingsford M. J. and Gerlach G. (2002). Larval reef fish could use odour for detection, retention and orientation to reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241: 151–160Google Scholar
  2. Baelde P. (1990). Differences in the structure of fish assemblages in Thalassia  testudinum beds in Guadeloupe, French West Indies and their ecological significance. Marine Biology 105: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker R. and Sheaves M. (2005). Redefining the piscivore assemblage of shallow estuarine nursery habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 291: 197–213Google Scholar
  4. Beck M. W., Heck K. L., Able K. W., Childers D. L., Eggleston D. B., Gillanders B. M., Halpern B., Hays C. G., Hoshino K., Minello T. J., Orth R. J., Sheridan P. F. and Weinstein M. P. (2001). The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51: 633–641Google Scholar
  5. Blaber S. J. M. (2000). Tropical Estuarine Fishes: Ecology, Exploitation and Conservation. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke N. C. (1995). Nocturnal foraging habitats of French and bluestriped grunts, Haemulon  flavolineatum and H. sciurus, at Tobacco Caye, Belize. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42: 365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cocheret de la Morinière E., Pollux B. J. A. and Nagelkerken I. (2002). Post-settlement life cycle migration patterns and habitat preferences of coral reef fish that use seagrass and mangrove habitats as nurseries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crook A. C. (1999). Quantitative evidence for assortative schooling in a coral reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 176: 17–23Google Scholar
  9. Dorenbosch, M., M. G. G. Grol, M. J. A. Christianen, I. Nagelkerken & G. van der  Velde, 2005. Indo-Pacific seagrass beds and mangroves contribute to fish density and diversity on adjacent coral reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 302: 63–67Google Scholar
  10. Dorenbosch M., M. C. van Riel, Nagelkerken I. and G. van der Velde (2004b). The relationship of reef fish densities to the proximity of mangrove and seagrass nurseries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60: 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorenbosch M., Verweij M. C., Nagelkerken I., G. van der Velde and Jiddawi N. S. (2004a). Homing and daytime tidal movements of juvenile snappers (Lutjanidae) between shallow-water nursery habitats in Zanzibar, western Indian Ocean. Environmental Biology of Fishes 70: 203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher R. and Bellwood D. R. (2003). Undisturbed swimming behaviour and nocturnal activity of coral reef fish larvae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 263: 177–188Google Scholar
  13. Froese, R. & D. Pauly, 2003. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication (www.fishbase.org) 24-6-03Google Scholar
  14. Gust N., Choat J. H. and Ackerman J. L. (2002). Demographic plasticity in tropical reef fishes. Marine Biology 140: 1039–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halpern B. S. (2004). Are mangroves a limiting resource for two coral reef fishes?. Marine Ecology Progress Series 272: 93–98Google Scholar
  16. Huxham M., Kimani E. N. and Augley J. (2004). Mangrove fish: a comparison of assemblage structure between forested and cleared habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60: 637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyndes G. A., Kendrick A. J., MacArthur L. D. and Stewart E. (2003). Differences in the species- and size-composition of fish assemblages in three distinct seagrass habitats with differing plant and meadow structure. Marine Biology 142: 1195–1206Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins G. P., Black K. P., Wheatley M. J. and Hatton D. N. (1997). Temporal and spatial variability in recruitment of a temperate, seagrass-associated fish is largely determined by physical processes in the pre- and post-settlement phases. Marine Ecology Progress Series 148: 23–35Google Scholar
  19. Jiddawi N. S. and Stanley R. D. (1997). Fisheries Stock Assessment in the Traditional Fishery Sector: The Information Needs. Canadian International Development Agency, Zanzibar, Tanzania Google Scholar
  20. Kanashiro K. (1998). Settlement and migration of early stage spangled emperor, Lethrinus  nebulosus (Pisces: Lethrinidae), in the coastal waters off Okinawa Island, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 64: 618–625Google Scholar
  21. Kimani E. N., Mwatha G. K., Wakwabi E. O., Ntiba J. M. and Okoth B. K. (1996). Fishes of a shallow tropical mangrove estuary, Gazi, Kenya. Marine and Freshwater Research 47: 857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kingsford M. J., Leis J. M., Shanks A., Lindeman K. C., Morgan S. G. and Pineda J. (2002). Sensory environments, larval abilities and local self-recruitment. Bulletin of Marine Science 70: 309–340Google Scholar
  23. Kiso K. and Mahyam M. I. (2003). Distribution and feeding habits of juvenile and young John’s snapper Lutjanus  johnii in the Matang mangrove estuary, west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Fisheries Science 69: 563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kochzius, M., 1997. Interrelation of ichthyofauna from a seagrass meadow and coral reef in the Philippines. Proceedings of the 5th Indo-Pacific Fisheries Conference, Noume´ a 1997, 517–535.Google Scholar
  25. Laroche J., Baran E. and Rasoanandrasana N. B. (1997). Temporal patterns in a fish assemblage of a semiarid mangrove zone in Madagascar. Journal of Fish Biology 51: 3–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lecchini D., Shima J., Banaigs B. and Galzin R. (2005). Larval sensory abilities and mechanisms of habitat selection of a coral reef fish during settlement. Oecologia 143: 326–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lugendo B. R., Pronker A., Cornelissen I., A. de Groene, Nagelkerken I., Dorenbosch M., G. van der Velde and Mgaya Y. (2005). Habitat utilisation by juveniles of commercially important fish species in a marine embayment in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Aquatic Living Resources 18: 149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McFarland W. N., Brothers E. B., Ogden J. C., Shulman M. J., Birmingham E. L. and Kotchian-Prentiss N. M. (1985). Recruitment patterns in young French grunts, Haemulon  flavolineatum (Family Haemulidae), at St Croix, Virgin Islands. Fisheries Bulletin 83: 413–426Google Scholar
  29. McAleece, N., 1997. Biodiversity Pro 2. World Wide Web electronic publication by the National History Museum London & The Scottisch Association of Marine Science (http://www.sams.ac.uk/activities/downloads/software/bdpro. zip)Google Scholar
  30. Mumby P. J., Edwards A. J., Ernesto Arias-Gonzalez J. E., Lindeman P. G., Gall A., Gorczynska M. I., Harborne A. R., Pescod C. L., Renken H., Wabnitz C. C. C. and Llewellyn G. (2004). Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature 427: 533–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagelkerken I., Dorenbosch M., Verberk W. C. E. P., Cocheret de la Morinière E. and G. van der Velde (2000a). Importance of shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay for juvenile coral reef fishes: patterns in biotope association, assemblage structure and spatial distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 202: 175–193Google Scholar
  32. Nagelkerken I., Dorenbosch M., Verberk W. C. E. P., Cocheret de la Morinière E. and G. van der Velde (2000b). Day–night shifts of fishes between shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay, with emphasis on the nocturnal feeding of Haemulidae and Lutjanidae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 194: 55–64Google Scholar
  33. Nagelkerken I., Kleijnen S., Klop T., R. A. C. J. van den Brand, Cocheret de la Morinière E. and G. van der Velde (2001). Dependence of Caribbean reef fishes on mangroves and seagrass beds as nursery biotopes: a comparison of fish faunas between bays with and without mangroves/seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 214: 225–235Google Scholar
  34. Nagelkerken I., Roberts C. M., G. van der Velde, Dorenbosch M., M. C. van Riel, Cocheret de la Morinière E. and Nienhuis P. H. (2002). How important are mangroves and seagrass beds for coral-reef fish? The nursery hypothesis tested on an island scale. Marine Ecology Progress Series 244: 299–305Google Scholar
  35. Nagelkerken I. and G. van der Velde (2002). Do non-estuarine mangroves harbour higher densities of juvenile fish than adjacent shallow-water and coral reef habitats in Curaçao (Netherlands Antilles)?. Marine Ecology Progress Series 245: 191–204Google Scholar
  36. Nakamura Y. and Sano M. (2004b). Comparison between community structures of fishes in Enhalus  acoroides- and Thalassia  hemprichii-dominated seagrass beds on fringing coral reefs in the Ryuku Islands, Japan. Ichthyological Research 51: 38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura Y. and Sano M. (2004a). Is there really lower predation risk for juvenile fishes in a seagrass bed compared with an adjacent coral area?. Bulletin of Marine Science 74: 477–482Google Scholar
  38. Nanami A., Nishihira M., Suzuki T. and Yokochi H. (2005). Species-specific habitat distribution of coral reef fish assemblages in relation to habitat characteristics in an Okinawan coral reef. Environmental Biology of Fishes 72: 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ogden J. C. and Buckman N. S. (1973). Movements, foraging groups and diurnal migrations of the striped parrotfish Scarus  croicensis Bloch (Scaridae). Ecology 54: 589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogden J. C. and Ehrlich P. R. (1977). The behaviour of heterotypic resting schools of juvenile grunts (Pomadasyidae). Marine Biology 42: 273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parrish J. D. (1989). Fish communities of interacting shallow-water habitats in tropical oceanic regions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58: 143–160Google Scholar
  42. Pollard D. A. (1984). A review of ecological studies on seagrass-fish communities, with particular reference to recent studies in Australia. Aquatic Botany 18: 3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Polunin N. V. C. and Roberts C. M. (2004). Greater biomass and value of target coral-reef fishes in two small Caribbean marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 100: 167–176 Google Scholar
  44. Quin T. P. and Kojis B. L. (1987). The influence of diel cycle, tidal direction and trawl alignment on beam trawl catches in an equatorial estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes 19: 297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Risk A. (1997). Effects of habitat on the settlement and post settlement success of the ocean surgeonfish Acanthurus bahianus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161: 51–59Google Scholar
  46. Sheaves M. (2001). Are there really few piscivorous fishes in shallow estuarine habitats?. Marine Ecology Progress Series 222: 279–290Google Scholar
  47. Shulman M. J. (1985). Recruitment of coral reef fishes: effects of distribution of predators and shelter. Ecology 66: 1056–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simpson S. D., Meekan M. G., McCauley R. D. and Jeffs A. (2004). Attraction of settlement-stage coral reef fishes to reef noise. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276: 263–268Google Scholar
  49. Sogard S. M., Powell G. V. N. and Holmquist J. G. (1987). Epibenthic fish communities on Florida Bay banks: relations with physical parameters and seagrass cover. Marine Ecology Progress Series 40: 25–39Google Scholar
  50. Sweatman H. (1988). Field evidence that settling coral reef fish larvae detect resident fishes using dissolved chemical cues. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 124: 163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sweatman H. and Robertson D. R. (1994). Grazing halos and predation on juvenile Caribbean surgeonfishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 111: 1–6Google Scholar
  52. ter Braak C. J. F. and Smilauer P. (1998). Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer power, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Thollot P. and Kulbicki M. (1988). Overlap between the fishfauna inventories of coral reefs, soft bottoms and mangroves in Saint–Vincent Bay (New Caledonia). Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium Australia 2: 613–618Google Scholar
  54. Wakwabi E. O. and Mees J. (1999). The epibenthos of the backwaters of a tropical mangrove creek (Tudor creek, Mombasa, Kenya). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49: 189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson R. A. and Quinn J. T. (1997). Performance of transect and point count underwater visual census methods. Ecological Modelling 104: 103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weinstein M. P. and Heck K. L. (1979). Ichthyofauna of seagrass meadows along the Caribbean coast of Panama and the Gulf of Mexico: composition, structure and community ecology. Marine Biology 50: 97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yáñez-Arancibia, A., A. L. Lara-Dominguez & J. W. Day, 1993.Interactions between mangrove and seagrass habitats mediated by estuarine nekton assemblages - coupling of primary and secondary production. Hydrobiologia 264: 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dorenbosch
    • 1
  • M. G. G. Grol
    • 1
  • I. Nagelkerken
    • 1
  • G. van der Velde
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Faculty of ScienceRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations