, Volume 560, Issue 1, pp 133–143 | Cite as

Organic Nitrogen Retention in the Atchafalaya River Swamp

Primary Research Paper


Freshwater diversions from the lower Mississippi River into the region’s wetlands have been considered an alternative means for reducing nitrogen loading. The Atchafalaya River Swamp, the largest freshwater swamp in North America, carries the entire discharge of the Red River and 30% of the discharge of the Mississippi River, but it is largely unknown how much nitrogen actually can be retained from the overflowing waters of the Mississippi–Atchafalaya River system. Nitrogen discharge from the upper Mississippi River Basin has been implicated as the major cause for the hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, which threatens not only the aquatic ecosystem health, but also Louisiana’s fishery industry, among other problems. This study was conducted to determine the change in organic nitrogen mass as water flows through the Atchafalaya River Swamp and into the Gulf of Mexico. By utilizing the river’s long-term discharge and water quality data (1978–2002), monthly and annual organic nitrogen fluxes were quantified, and their relationships with the basin’s hydrologic conditions were investigated. A total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) mass input–output balance between the upstream (Simmesport) and downstream (Morgan City and Wax Lake Outlet) locations was established to examine the organic nitrogen removal potential for this large swamp. The results showed that on average, TKN input into the Atchafalaya was 200 323 tons year−1 and TKN output leaving the basin was 145 917 tons year−1, resulting in a 27% removal rate of organic nitrogen. Monthly TKN input and output in the basin were highest from March to June (input vs. output: 25 000 vs. 18 000 tons month−1) and lowest from August to November (8000 vs. 6000 tons month−1). There was a large variation in both annual and inter-annual organic nitrogen removals. The variability was positively correlated with the amount of inflow water at Simmesport, suggesting that regulating the river’s inflow at the Old River flood control structures may help reduce nitrogen loading of the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico. Furthermore, the in-stream loss of organic nitrogen indicates that previous studies may have overestimated nitrogen discharge from the Mississippi–Atchafalaya River system.


eutrophication hypoxia nitrogen retention total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) fish kill Mississippi-Atchafalaya Gulf of Mexico 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arheimer, B., Wittgren, H. B. 1994Modelling the effects of wetlands on regional nitrogen transportAmbio23378386Google Scholar
  2. Boesch, D. F. 2002Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystemsEstuaries25886900Google Scholar
  3. Demas, C. R., S. R. Brazelton & N. J. Powell, 2002. The Atchafalaya Basin – river of trees. U.S. Geological Survey, Fact Sheet FS-021-02Google Scholar
  4. Devito, K. J., Dillon, P. J., Lazerte, B. D. 1989Phosphorus and nitrogen retention in 5 precambrian shield wetlandsBiogeochemistry8185204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donner, S. D., M. T. Coe, J. D. Lenters, T. E. Twine & J. A. Foley, 2002. Modeling the impact of hydrological changes on nitrate transport in the Mississippi River Basin from 1955 to 1994. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(3): Art. No. 1043Google Scholar
  6. Donner, S. D., C. J. Kucharik & M. Oppenheimer, 2004. The influence of climate on in-stream removal of nitrogen. Geophysical Research Letters (20): Art. No. L20509Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, D. D., 1996. Trends in nutrient inflows to the Gulf of Mexico from streams draining the conterminous United States, 1972–93. USGS Water-Resources Investigation Report 96-4113Google Scholar
  8. Goolsby, D. A., W. A. Battaglin, G. B. Lawrence, R. S. Artz, B. T. Aulenbach & R. P. Hooper, 1999. Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi–Atchafalaya Basin: Topic 3 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Silver Spring (MD): NOAA Coastal Ocean Office. Decision Analysis Series no. 17Google Scholar
  9. Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., Aulenbach, B. T., Hooper, R. P. 2001Nitrogen input to the Gulf of MexicoJournal of Environmental Quality30329336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kadlec, R. H., Knight, R. L. 1996Treatment WetlandsLewis PublishersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Knight, D. H., Fahey, T. J., Running, S. W. 1985Factors affecting water and nutrient outflow from lodgepole pine forests in WyomingEcological Monographs552948Google Scholar
  12. Knight, R. L., R. W. Ruble, R. H. Kadlec & S. C. Reed, 1993. Database: North American wetlands for water quality treatment. Phase II report. U.S. EPAGoogle Scholar
  13. Knight, R. L. 1994Treatment wetlands database now availableWater Environment & Technology63133Google Scholar
  14. LDEQ, 2000. Louisiana’s Nonpoint Source Management Plan. Volume 6, State of Louisiana Water Quality Management Plan. Baton Rouge, LouisianaGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitsch, W. J., 1999. Hypoxia solution through wetland restoration in America’s breadbasket. National Wetlands Newsletter 21(6): 9–10, 14Google Scholar
  16. Mitsch, W. J., J. W. Day Jr., J. W. Gilliam, P. M. Groffman, D. L. Hey, G. W. Randall & N. Wang, 1999. Reducing nutrient loads, especially nitrate-nitrogen, to surface water, ground water & the Gulf of Mexico – Identifies and evaluates methods to reduce nutrient loads to surface water, ground water & the Gulf of Mexico. Topic 5 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Silver Spring, Maryland. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program, Decision Analysis Series No. 19Google Scholar
  17. Mitsch, W. J., Day, J. W.,Jr., Gilliam, J. W., Groffman, P. M., Hey, D. L., Randall, G. W., Wang, N. M. 2001Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problemBioscience51373388Google Scholar
  18. Mitsch, W. J. & J. G. Gosselink, 2000. Wetlands, 3rd edn. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, K. E., Touchet, B. A., White, A. G., Daigle, J. J., Clark, H. L. 1977Soil survey of St. Martin Parish, LouisianaUSDA Soil Conservation ServiceWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Nixon, S. W. & V. Lee, 1986. Wetlands and water quality: a regional review of recent research in the United States on the role of freshwater and saltwater wetlands as sources, sinks & transformers of nitrogen, phosphorus & various heavy metals. U.S. Army Eng. Waterways Experiment Station. Technical Report Y-86-2Google Scholar
  21. Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Justic, D., Dortch, Q., Wiseman, W. J.,Jr., Sen Gupta, B. K. 1996Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelfEstuaries19386407Google Scholar
  22. Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Wiseman, W. J.,Jr., Dortch, Q. 1998Consequences of the 1993 Mississippi River Flood in the Gulf of MexicoRegulated Rivers: Research & Management14161177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rabalais, N. N.Turner, R. E. eds. 2001Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems. Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58American Geophysical UnionWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Scavia, D. 2002Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi riverBioscience52129142Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute, 1996. SAS/STAT user’s guide, Version 6.12, 4th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Soranno, P. A., Hubler, S. L, Carpenter, S. R., Lathrop, R. C. 1996Phosphorus loads to surface waters: a simple model to account for spatial pattern of land useEcological Applications6865878Google Scholar
  27. Turner, R. E. 1999. Nitrogen losses in water flowing through Louisiana swamps, In Rozas, L. P., J. A. Nyman, C. E. Proffitt, N. N. Rabalais, D. J. Reed & R. E. Turner (eds), Natural System Function and Response to Human Influence. Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant Publication, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 145–154Google Scholar
  28. USDA, 1987. Fram drainage in the United States: History, status & prospects. Economic Res. Serv. Misc Publ. no. 1455. USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Leeden, F., Troise, F. L., Dodd, D. K. 1990The Water EncyclopediaLewis PublishersChelsea, MIGoogle Scholar
  30. Watson, J. T., Reed, S. C., Kadlec, R. H., Knight, R. L., Whitehouse, A. E. 1989

    Performance expectations and loading rates for constructed wetlands

    Hammer, D. A. eds. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentLewis PublishersChelsea, MI319351
    Google Scholar
  31. Xu, Y. J., 2004. Surface water and sediment inflow and outflow for the Atchafalaya River Basin. In Proc 2004 AWRA Annual Conf., CM ROM, S.J. Nix, ed. Middleburg VA: AWRAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Renewable Natural ResourcesLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations