, Volume 555, Issue 1, pp 309–320 | Cite as

Assessing the Sensitivity of Seabed Species and Biotopes – The Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN)



Science-based approaches to support the conservation of marine biodiversity have been developed in recent years. They include measures of ‘rarity’, ‘diversity’, ‘importance’, biological indicators of water ‘quality’ and measures of ‘sensitivity’. Identifying the sensitivity of species and biotopes, the main topic of this contribution, relies on accessing and interpreting available scientific data in a structured way and then making use of information technology to disseminate suitably presented information to decision makers. The Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) has achieved that research for a range of environmentally critical species and biotopes over the past four years and has published the reviews on the MarLIN Web site (www.marlin.ac.uk). Now, by linking the sensitivity database and databases of survey information, sensitivity mapping approaches using GIS are being developed. The methods used to assess sensitivity are described and the approach is advocated for wider application in Europe.

Key words:

biotopes conservation GIS management sensitivity species 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borja, A., Muxika, I., Franco, J. 2003The application of a marine biotic index to different impact sources affecting soft-bottom benthic communities along European coastsMarine Pollution Bulletin46835845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies C. E. & D. Moss, 2002. EUNIS Habitat Classification. Final Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, European Environment Agency. February 2002. 125ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Gundlach, E. R., Hayes, M. O. 1978Classification of coastal environments in terms of potential vulnerability to oil spill damageMarine Technology Society Journal121827Google Scholar
  4. Hiscock, K. 1997“Use available data”Marine Pollution Bulletin347477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hiscock, K., Elliott, M., Laffoley, D., Rogers, S. 2003Data use and information creation: challenges for marine scientists and for managersMarine Pollution Bulletin46534541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laffoley D. d’A., D. W. Connor, M. L. Tasker & T. Bines, 2000. Nationally important seascapes, habitats and species. A recommended approach to their identification, conservation and protection. Prepared for the DETR Working Group on the Review of Marine Nature Conservation by English Nature and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Peterborough, English Nature Research Report 392, 17 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Sanderson, W. 1996Rarity of marine benthic species in Great Britain: development and application of assessment criteriaAquatic Conservation6245256Google Scholar
  8. Tyler-Walters H., K. Hiscock, D. B. Lear & A. Jackson, 2001. Identifying species and ecosystem sensitivities. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN), Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth. Contract CW0826 Google Scholar
  9. Warwick, R.M., Clarke, K. R. 2001Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of speciesOceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review39207231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN)Marine Biological Association of the UKPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations