, Volume 553, Issue 1, pp 143–152

Community Structure of In-Stream Bryophytes in English and Welsh Rivers

Primary Research Paper


Information on the distribution of bryophytes in mainland British rivers was collected as part of the Joint Nature Conservancy Council (JNCC) survey of in-stream macrophyte distribution between 1978 and 1997. A sub-set of sites (1604) containing the 50 most common bryophytes was analysed. The commonest of these 50 species were Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides. The majority of species encountered are not considered to be truly aquatic. Detrended Correspondence Analysis of community structure revealed a continuum of variation in assemblages across sites rather than distinct groupings of bryophytes. Canonical Correspondence Analysis was used to analyse a sub-set of sites (625) for which water chemistry were available to test the influence of environmental variables on the distribution of bryophytes. The analysis suggested the strongest environmental gradient was the transition from lowland systems on chalk geology to steeply sloping, high altitude systems with resistant geology. Mapping CCA axis 1 scores on to a map of England and Wales suggested a geographic trend in bryophyte species distribution with community structure undergoing a transition from the upland regions and the western seaboard to the south east of England. Stepwise regression analysis confirmed the importance of the upland lowland trend, showing that substrate size, altitude of source, distance to source and altitude were important predictors of species richness (p < 0.0001, adjusted R2 = 0.30).


bryophytes geology upland lowland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., Smith, V. H. 1998Nonpoint source pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogenEcological Applications8559568Google Scholar
  2. Dawson, F. H., J. R. Newman, M. J. Gravelle, K. J. Rouen & P. Henville, 1999. Assessment of the trophic status of rivers using macrophytes. Evaluation of the Mean Trophic Rank. In R&D Technical Report E39: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  3. Demars, B. O. L., Harper, D. M. 1998The aquatic macrophytes of an English lowland river system: assessing response to nutrient enrichmentHydrobiologia3847588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Downes, B. J., Entwisle, T. J., Reich, P. 2003Effects of flow regulation on disturbance frequencies and in- channel bryophytes and macroalgae in some upland streamsRiver Research and Applications192742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grime, J. P., Rincon, E. R., Wickerson, B. E. 1990Bryophytes and Plant Strategy TheoryBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society104175186Google Scholar
  6. Haslam, S. M., 1978. River Plants: The Macrophytic Vegetation of Watercourses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, M. O. & F. D. Lozano, 1994. A numerical analysis of the distribution of liverworts in Great Britain. In Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland: Harley Books.Google Scholar
  8. Hill, M. O., C. D. Preston & A. J. E. Smith, 1991. Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Harley Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, M. O., C. D. Preston & A. J. E. Smith, 1992. Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Harley Books.Google Scholar
  10. Hill, M. O., C. D. Preston & A. J. E. Smith, 1994. Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Harley Books.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, N. T. H. 1999British river macrophytes - perceptions and uses in the 20th centuryAquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems9535539Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, N. T. H., Boon, P. J., Rowell, T. A. 1998A revised classification system for British rivers based on their aquatic plant communitiesAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems8555578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mainstone, C. P., Parr, W. 2002Phosphorus in Rivers - ecology and managementThe Science of the Total Environment2822547Google Scholar
  14. Miles, C. J., Longton, R. E. 1992Deposition of moss spores in relation to distance from parent gametophytesJournal of Bryology17355368Google Scholar
  15. Minitab., 2004. Minitab 14.12.0 Release 14 Statistical software. Minitab Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Muotka, T., Virtanen, R. 1995The stream as a habitat templet for bryophytes - species distributions along gradients in disturbance and substratum heterogeneityFreshwater Biology33141160Google Scholar
  17. Newman, J. & F. Dawson, 1996. Guidance on interpretation of the Mean Trophic Rank System for Assessment of trophic status of rivers using macrophytes. Use of the MTR for purposes of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. In Environment Agency R&D Progress Report E1/i694/03, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Paton, A. J., 1999. The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles. Harley Books.Google Scholar
  19. Reynolds, B., Lowe, J. A. H., Smith, R. I., Norris, D. A., Fowler, D., Bell, S. A., Stevens, P. A., Ormerod, S. J. 1999Acid deposition in Wales: the results of the 1995 Welsh Acid Waters SurveyEnvironmental Pollution105251266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Satake, K., Nishikawa, M., Shibata, K. 1989Distribution of aquatic Bryophytes in relation to water chemistry of the acid river Akagawa, JapanArchiv Fur Hydrobiologie116299311Google Scholar
  21. Shaw , A. J. & B. Goffinet, 2000. Bryophyte Biology Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Slack, N. G., Glime, J. M. 1985Niche relationships of mountain stream BryophytesBryologist88718Google Scholar
  23. Stoneburner, A., Lane, D. M., Anderson, L. E. 1992Spore dispersal distances in Atrichum undulatum (Polytrichaceae)Bryologist95324328Google Scholar
  24. Suren, A. M. 1996Bryophyte distribution patterns in relation to macro, meso, and micro-scale variables in South Island streamsNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research30495517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suren, A. M., Duncan, M. J. 1999Rolling stones and mosses: effect of substrate stability on bryophyte communities in streamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society18457467Google Scholar
  26. Suren, A. M., Ormerod, S. J. 1998Aquatic bryophytes in Himalayan streams: testing a distribution model in a highly heterogeneous environmentFreshwater Biology40697716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1997, 1998. Canoco for Windows. Wageningen.Google Scholar
  28. ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Smilauer, 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s guide to Canoco for Windows. Ithaca: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
  29. Thiebaut, G., Vanderpoorten, A., Guerold, F., Boudot, J. P., Muller, S. 1998Bryological patterns and streamwater acidification in the Vosges Mountains (NE France): An analysis tool for the survey of acidification processesChemosphere3612751289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tremp, H. & A. Kohler, 1993. Wassermoose als Versauerungindikatoren. Praxiesorientierte Bioinkationsverfahren mit Wassermoosen zur Überwachung des Saurezustandes von Pufferschwachen Fliessgewässern. In Projekt Angewandte Okologie, Landesanstalt fur Umweltschultz Baden- Wurt-temberg. 1–125.Google Scholar
  31. Vanderpoorten, A., Klein, J. P. 1999aVariations of aquatic bryophyte assemblages in the Rhine Rift related to water quality. 2. The waterfalls of the Vosges and the Black ForestJournal of Bryology21109115Google Scholar
  32. Vanderpoorten, A., Klein, J. P. 1999bA comparative study of the hydrophyte flora from the Alpine Rhine. to the Middle Rhine Application to the conservation of the Upper Rhine aquatic ecosystemsBiological Conservation87163172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vanderpoorten, A., Klein, J. P. 2000Aquatic bryophyte assemblages along a gradient of regulation in the river RhineHydrobiologia4101116Google Scholar
  34. Wright, J. F., Blackburn, J. H., Gunn, R. J. M., Furse, M. T., Armitage, P. D., Winder, J. M., Symes, K. L., Moss, D. 1996Macroinvertebrate frequency data for the RIVPACS III sites in Great Britain and their use in conservation evaluationAquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems6141167Google Scholar
  35. Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T., Moss, D. 1998River classification␣using invertebrates: RIVPACS applicationsAquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems8617631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wright, J. F., Moss, D., Armitage, P. D., Furse, M. T. 1984A preliminary classification of running-water sites in great-Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental dataFreshwater Biology14221256Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyWinfrith Technology CentreDorchesterUK

Personalised recommendations