, Volume 553, Issue 1, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Relationship between Riparian Vegetation and Stream Benthic Communities at Three Spatial Scales

  • Sandra L. Rios
  • Robert C. Bailey
Primay Research Paper


We examined the influence of riparian vegetation on macroinvertebrate community structure in streams of the Upper Thames River watershed in southwestern Ontario. Thirty-three μ-basins (129–1458 ha) were used to identify land cover variables that influenced stream macroinvertebrates. Micro-basins represented the entire drainage area of study streams and were similar in stream order (first, second) and land cover (agricultural or forest; no urban). We described the structure and composition of riparian vegetation and benthic macroinvertebrate communities at the outflow reach. The nature of the land cover was quantified for the stream network buffer (30 m) and the whole μ-basin. The objective of this study was to measure the magnitude and nature of the relationship between the riparian vegetation and benthic macroinvertebrate community at the outflow reach, stream network buffer, and whole μ-basin scales. Taxon richness (including total number of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa) and Simpson’s diversity of the macroinvertebrate community all increased with increased tree cover in the riparian zone at the outflow reach scale. Simpson’s equitability was lower with greater agricultural land cover in the stream network buffer. No relationship between the macroinvertebrate community and land cover was found at the whole μ-basin scale. Analysis of the influence of land cover on stream communities within a spatial hierarchy is important for understanding the interactions of stream ecosystems with their adjacent landscapes.


macroinvertebrate community structure riparian vegetation spatial scales micro-basins 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abell, R., D. M. Olson, E. Dinerstein & P. T. Hurley, 2000. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J. D., Erickson, D. L., Fay, J. 1997The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scalesFreshwater Biology37149161Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, R. C., Norris, R. H., Reynoldson, T. B. 2003Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems: Using the Reference Condition ApproachKluwer AcademicBostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, D. R., Farmer, M. E. D. 1997The effects of conservation tillage practices on benthic invertebrate communities in headwater streams in southwestern Ontario, CanadaEnvironmental Pollution96207215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchert, G. P., Rajora, O. P., Hood, J. V., Dancik, B. P. 1997Effects of harvesting on genetic diversity in old growth eastern white pine in Ontario, CanadaConservation Biology11747758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunn, S. E., Davies, P. M., Mosisch, T. D. 1999Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradationFreshwater Biology41333345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carothers, S. W., 1977. Importance, preservation, and management of riparian habitat: an overview. In USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM, Importance, Preservation, and Management of Riparian Habitat Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins CO, 43: 2–4.Google Scholar
  8. Clausen, J. C., Guillard, K., Sigmund, C. M., Martin Dors, K. 2000Ecosystem restoration: water quality changes from riparian buffer restoration in ConnecticutJournal of Environmental Quality2917511761Google Scholar
  9. Collinge, S. K., Forman, R. T. T. 1998A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grassland insectsOikos826284Google Scholar
  10. Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., Cummins, K. W. 1991An ecosystem perspective of riparian zonesBioScience41540551Google Scholar
  11. Harriman, R., Likens, G. E., Hultberg, H., Neal, C. 1994Influence of management practices in catchments on freshwater acidification: Afforestation in the United Kingdom and North AmericaSteinberg, C. E. W.Wright, R. F. eds. Acidification of Freshwater Ecosystems: Implications for the FutureJohn Wiley SonsChichester, UK83101Google Scholar
  12. Hauer, F. R. & G. A. Lamberti, (eds), 1996. Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Methods in Stream Ecology. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, C. P., Vinson, M. R. 2000Weak correspondence between landscape classification and stream invertebrate assemblages: implications for bioassessmentJournal of the North American Benthological Society19501517Google Scholar
  14. Heino, J., Muotka, T., Paavola, R., Hämäläinen, H., Koskenniemi, E. 2002Correspondence between regional delineations and spatial patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages of boreal headwater streamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society21397413Google Scholar
  15. Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1988Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family level biotic indexJournal of the North American Benthological Society76568Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, L. B., Gage, S. H. 1997Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystemsFreshwater Biology37113132Google Scholar
  17. Lenat, D. R., Crawford, J. K. 1994Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina piedmont streamsHydrobiologia294185199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marchant, R. 1989A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebratesBulletin of the Australian Society for Limnology124952Google Scholar
  19. Naiman, R. J., Decamps, H., Pollock, M. 1993The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversityEcological Applications2209212Google Scholar
  20. Norris, R. H., Thoms, M. C. 1999What is river health?Freshwater Biology41197209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne, L. L., Kovacic, D. A. 1993Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream managementFreshwater Biology29243258Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, M., Norris, R. H. 1996The effect of habitat-specific samplings on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive modelFreshwater Biology36419436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poff, N. L. 1997Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecologyJournal of the North American Benthological Society16391409Google Scholar
  24. Reynoldson, T. B., Norris, R. H., Resh, V. H., Day, K. E., Rosenberg, D. M. 1997The reference condition: assessing water quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebratesJournal of North American Benthological Society16833452Google Scholar
  25. Richards, C., Host, G. E., Arthur, J. W. 1993Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchmentFreshwater Biology29285294Google Scholar
  26. Richards, C., Johnson, L. B., Host, G. E. 1996Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biotaCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences53295311Google Scholar
  27. Roth, N. E., Allan, J. D., Erickson, D. L. 1996Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scalesLandscape Ecology11141156Google Scholar
  28. Rowe, L. K., Taylor, C. H. 1994Hydrology and related changes after harvesting native forest catchments and establishing Pinus radiata plantations. Part 3. Stream temperaturesHydrological Processes8299310Google Scholar
  29. Sandin, L., Johnson, R. K. 2000Ecoregions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of Swedish streamsJournal of North American Benthological Society19462474Google Scholar
  30. Sponseller, R. A., Benfield, E. F., Valett, H. M. 2001Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communitiesFreshwater Biology4614091424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens, M. H. H., Cummins, K. W. 1999Effects of Long-Term Disturbance on Riparian Vegetation and In-Stream CharacteristicsJournal of Freshwater Ecology14117Google Scholar
  32. Stewart, P. M., Butcher, J. T., Swinford, T. O. 2000Land use, habitat, and water quality effects on macroinvertebrate communities in three catchments of a Lake Michigan associated marsh systemAquatic Ecosystem Health and Management3179189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tate, C. M., Heinly, J. S. 1995The ordination of benthic invertebrates communities in the South Platte River Basin in relation to environmental factorsFreshwater Biology33439454Google Scholar
  34. UTRCA - The Upper Thames River Authority, 2001. Report Cards.Google Scholar
  35. Verry, E. S., James, W., Hornbeck, C., Dolloff, C. A. 2000Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United StatesLewis PublishersBoca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, L., Lyons, J., Rasmussen, P., Seelbach, P., Simon, T., Wiley,  M., Kanehl, P., Baker, E., Niemela, S., Stewart, P. M. 2003Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, USACanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences60491505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weigel, B. M. 2003Development of stream macroinvertebrate models that predict catchment and local stressors in WisconsinJournal of the North American Benthological Society22123142Google Scholar
  38. Weigel, B. M., Lyons, J., Paine, L. K., Dodson, S. I., Undersander, D. J. 2000Using stream macroinvertebrates to compare riparian land use practices on cattle farms in southwestern WisconsinJournal of Freshwater Ecology1593106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations