Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 542, Issue 1, pp 103–111 | Cite as

Consumptive and non-consumptive effects of turbellarian (Mesostoma sp.) predation on anostracans

  • Els R. M. De. Roeck
  • Tom Artois
  • Luc Brendonck
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

We assessed the predatory impact of Mesostoma sp. (Rhabditophora) on hatching and survival of Branchipodopsis wolfi (Anostraca) under laboratory conditions. The hatching percentages of resting eggs of B. wolfi were negatively influenced to a significant degree by the presence of Mesostoma sp. or the medium in which the worms were kept before, but only when prey and predator originated from the same pool. This relationship was also not observed when eggs of the American anostracan Thamnocephalus platyurus were exposed to the Turbellaria from Botswana. There was, however, no indication of predation of B. wolfi eggs by Mesostoma sp., either by eating them totally or by sucking them out. When the same number of anostracans of different ages was offered simultaneously to Mesostoma sp., the 1- and 3-day-old specimens were eaten significantly faster than the 5-day-old juveniles and the adult B. wolfi. We conclude that Mesostoma sp. has a potentially strong influence on the population dynamics and life history characteristics of B. wolfi in temporary aquatic systems. Additionally, the feeding behaviour of Mesostoma sp. was described and the ultra structure of its rostral area was investigated.

Keywords

large branchiopods turbellarians predation temporary pools resting eggs hatching characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P.A. 2000The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidenceAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics3179105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. 1980The feeding behaviour of Bdellocephala punctata, a freshwater tricladOikos3527Google Scholar
  3. Binckley, C.A., W.J., Resetarits 2003Functional equivalence of non-lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvaeOikos102623629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaustein, L. 1990Evidence for predatory flatworms as organisers of zooplankton and mosquito community structure in rice fieldsHydrobiologia199179191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaustein, L. 1997Non consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: can eggs detect predators?Oecologia110212217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaustein, L., Dumont, H.J. 1990Typhloplanid flatworms (Mesostoma and related genera): Mechanisms of predation and evidence that they structure aquatic invertebrate communitiesHydrobiologia1986177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaustein, L., Kotler, B.P., Ward, D. 1995Direct and indirect effects of a predatory backswimmer (Notonecta maculata) on community structure of desert temporary poolsEcological Entomology20311318Google Scholar
  8. Boersma, M., De Meester, L., Spaak, P. 1999Environmental stress and local adaptation in Daphnia Magna Limnology and Oceanography44393402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brendonck, L., Coomans, A. 1994Egg morphology in African Streptocephalidae (Crustacea Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Part 1: South of Zambezi and Kunene riversArchives für Hydrobiology3313334Google Scholar
  10. Brendonck, L., Riddoch, B.J. 2000Egg bank dynamics in anostracan desert rock pool populations (Crustacea: Branchiopoda)Archives für Hydrobiology1487184Google Scholar
  11. Brendonck, L., Riddoch, B.J. 2001Hatching characteristics of the fairy shrimp Branchipodopsis wolfi in relation to the stochastic nature of its habitat, desert rock poolsVerhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie2739313935Google Scholar
  12. Brendonck, L., Riddoch, B.J., Weghe, V., T. Van, Doornen 1998The maintenance of egg banks in very short-lived pools – a case study with anostracans (Branchiopoda)Archives für Hydrobiology52141161Google Scholar
  13. Brendonck, L., Michels, E., De Meester, L., Riddoch, B.J. 2002Temporary pools are not enemy freeHydrobiologia486147159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, J.L., Dodson, S.I. 1965Predation, body size and composition of planktonScience1502835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cáceres, , C.E. Hairston, N.G. 1998Benthic pelagic coupling in planktonic crustaceans: the role of the benthosArchives für Hydrobiology52163174Google Scholar
  16. Cash, K.J., Wrona, F.J., Scrimgeour, G.J. 1995The effect of group size on per capita ingestion in flatwormsFreshwater Biology34477483Google Scholar
  17. Chesson, J. 1983The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging modelsEcology6412971304Google Scholar
  18. Dodson, S.I. 1988The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator avoidance behaviour in Daphnia Limnology and Oceanography3314311439Google Scholar
  19. Dumont, H.J., Carels, I. 1987Flatworm predator (Mesostoma cf. lingua) releases a toxin to catch planktonic prey (Daphnia magna)Limnology and Oceanography32699702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dumont Nandini, H.J.S., Sarma, S.S.S. 2002Cyst ornamentation in aquatic invertebrates: a defence against egg-predationHydrobiologia486161167Google Scholar
  21. Dumont, H.J., Schorreels, S. 1990A laboratory study of the feeding of Mesostoma lingua (Schmidt) (Turbellaria: Neorhabdocoela) on Daphnia magna Straus at four different temperaturesHydrobiologia1987989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fryer, G. 1986Enemy free space: a new name for an ancient ecological conceptBiological Journal of the Linnean Society27287292Google Scholar
  23. Kerfoot W.C. and Lynch M. (1987). Branchiopod communities: associations with planktivorous fish in space and time. In W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih (eds), Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press, New England.Google Scholar
  24. Kolasa, J. 1984Predation on mosquitoes by juveniles of Mesostoma spp. (Turbellaria)Freshwater Invertebrate Biology34246Google Scholar
  25. Kolasa J., (2001). Flatworms: Turbellaria and Nemertea. In Throp H.J. and Covich A.P. (eds), Ecology and classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, 155–180Google Scholar
  26. Knight, T.M., Miller, T.E. 2004Local adaptation within a population of Hydrocotyle Bonariensis Evolutionary Ecology Research6103114Google Scholar
  27. Lass, S., Spaak, P. 2003Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a reviewHydrobiologia491221239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacIsaac, H., Hutchinson, T. 1984The influence of benthic tundra pond vegetation and prey behavior on zooplankton predation by the flatworm Mesostoma lingua Canadian Journal of Zoology6316171621Google Scholar
  29. Maeda-Martínez, A.M., Belk, D., Obregón-Barboza, H., Dumont, H.J. 1997Large branchiopod assemblages common to Mexico and the United StatesHydrobiologia3594562Google Scholar
  30. Marcus, N.H. 1990Calanoid copepod, cladoceran, and rotifer eggs in sea-bottom sediments of Northern Californian coastal waters – identification, occurrence and hatchingMarine Biology105413418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ogren, R.E. 1995Predation behavior of land planariansHydrobiologia305105111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Onbé, , T.,  1978Sugar flotation method for sorting the resting eggs of marine cladocerans and copepods from sea-bottom sedimentBulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries441411Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S., Hebert, P. 1982A laboratory study of the feeding behavior of the rhabdocoel Mesostoma ehrenbergii on pond CladoceraCanadian Journal of Zoology6013051307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz, S., Hebert, P. 1986Prey preference and utilization by Mesostoma lingua (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela) at a low arctic siteHydrobiologia135251257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sih, A., Moore, R.D. 1993Delayed hatching of salamander eggs in response to enhanced larval predation riskAmerican Naturalist142947960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sih, A., Crowley, P., Mcpeek, M., Petranka, J., Strohmeier, K. 1985Predation, competition, and prey communities – a review of field experimentsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics16269311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spencer, M., Blaustein, L. 2001Hatching responses of temporary pool invertebrates to signals of environmental qualityIsrael Journal of Zoology47397417Google Scholar
  38. Weber, A. 2003More than one ‘fish kairomone’? Perch and stickleback kairomones affect Daphnia life history traits differentlyHydrobiologia498143150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, D.D. 1987The Ecology of Temporary WatersCroom HelmLondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Wrona, F.J., Koopowitz, H. 1998Behavior of the Rhabdocoel flatworm Mesostoma ehrenbergii in prey capture and feedingHydrobiologia3833540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, J.O. 1977An ecological study of Phaenocora unipunctata (Örsted) (Turbellaria; Rhabdocoela): predator–prey interrelationshipsHydrobiologia60145149Google Scholar
  42. Zaret T.M., (1980). The effect of prey motion on planktivore choice. In Kerfoot W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press New England: 594–603.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Els R. M. De. Roeck
    • 1
  • Tom Artois
    • 1
  • Luc Brendonck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyKULeuvenLeurenBelgium

Personalised recommendations