Hydrobiologia

, Volume 542, Issue 1, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Some aspects of water filtering activity of filter-feeders

Article

Abstract

On the basis of the previous publications, our new data and the existing scientific literature, we have formulated some fundamental principles that characterize the pivotal roles of the biodiversity of filter-feeders in ecosystems. Among those roles are: (1) the role of ecological repair of water quality, (2) the role of contributing to reliability and stability of the functioning of the ecosystem, (3) the role of contributing to creation of habitat heterogeneity, (4) the role of contributing to acceleration of migration of chemical elements. It is an important feature of the biomachinery of filter-feeders that it removes from water various particles of a very broad range of sizes. Another important principle is that the amount of the organic matter filtered out of water is larger than the amount assimilated so that a significant part of the removed material serves no useful function to the organism of the filter-feeder, but serves a beneficial function to some other species and to the ecosystem as a whole. The new experiments by the author additionally demonstrated a vulnerability of the filtration activity of filter feeders (e.g., bivalves and rotifers) to some xenobiotics (tetradecyltrymethylammonium bromide, heavy metals and some others). The inhibition of the filtration activity of filter-feeders may lead to the situation previously described as that of an ecological bomb of the second type.

Keywords

filter-feeders water purification bivalves pollution filtering activity 

Abbreviations

AFDW

ash-free dry weight

LD

liquid detergent

SD

synthetic detergent (laundry detergent in the form of powder)

SDS

sodium dodecyl sulphate

TDTMA

tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achituv, Y., Pedrotti, ML. 1999Costs and gains of porcelain crab suspension feeding in different flow conditionsMarine Ecology Progress Series184161169Google Scholar
  2. Alimov, A.F. 1981Functional Ecology of Freshwater Bivalves (Funktzionalnaja Ekologija Presnovodnykh Dvustvorchatykh Molluskov)Nauka pressLeningrad248Google Scholar
  3. Asmus, R.M., Asmus, H. 1991Mussel beds: limiting or promoting phytoplankton?Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology148215232Google Scholar
  4. Bacher, C. 1989Capacité trophique du bassin de Marennes-Oléron: couplage d’un modele de transport particulaire et d’un modele de croissance de l’huitre Crassosrea gigasAquatic Living Resources48199214Google Scholar
  5. Ball, B., Raine, R., Douglas, D. 1997Phytoplankton and particulate matter in Carlingford Lough, Ireland: an assessment of food availability and the impact of bivalve cultureEstuaries20430440Google Scholar
  6. Bern, L. 1987Zooplankton grazing on [methyl-3H]thymidine-labelled natural particle assemblages: determination of filtering rates and food selectivityFreshwater Biology17151159Google Scholar
  7. Cloern, J. 1982Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in South San francisco Bay?Marine Ecology Progress Series9191202Google Scholar
  8. Dame, R., Bushek, D., Prins, T. 2001Benthic suspension feeders as determinants of ecosystem structure and function in shallow coastal watersEcological Studies1511137Google Scholar
  9. Dame, R., Dankers, N., Prins, T., Jongsma, H., Smaal, A. 1991The influence of mussel beds on nutrients in the Western Wadden Sea and Eastern Scheldt estuariesEstuaries14130138Google Scholar
  10. Dame, R., Zingmark, R., Stevenson, H., Nelson, D. 1980

    Filter feeding coupling between the water column and benthic systems

    Kennedy, V. eds. Estuarine PerspectivesAcademic PressNew York521526
    Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B., Stuart, V., Villiers, M. 1989The filtration activity of a serpulid polychaete population (Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel) and its effects on water quality in a coastal marinaEstuary Coast Shelf Science29613620Google Scholar
  12. Donkin, P., Widdows, J., Evans, SV., Staff, F., Yan, T. 1997Effects of neurotoxic pesticides on the feeding rate of marine mussels Mytilus edulisPesticide Science49196209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frost, T. 1978Impact of the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris on a Sphagnum bog-pondVerhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie2023682371Google Scholar
  14. Frost, T. 1980Clearance rate determination for the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris: effects of temperature, particle type and concentration, and sponge sizeArchiv für Hydrobiologie90330356Google Scholar
  15. Gutelmaher, B.L. 1986Metabolism of Plankton as the Whole (Metabolizm Planktona Kak Edinogo Tzelogo)NaukaLeningrad156Google Scholar
  16. Hily, C. 1991Is the activity of benthic suspension feeders a factor controlling water quality in the Bay of Brest?Marine Ecology Progress Series69179188Google Scholar
  17. Jaramillo, E., Bertran, C., Bravo, A. 1992Mussel biodeposition in an estuary in southern ChileMarine Ecology Progress Series,828594Google Scholar
  18. Kartasheva, N.V., Ostroumov, SA. 1998Tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (tetradetziltrimetilammonij bromid)Toxicological Bulletin (Toksikologicheskii Vestnik)53032Google Scholar
  19. Kautsky, N., Evans, S. 1987Role of biodeposition by Mytilus edulis in the circulation of matter and nutrients in a Baltic coastal ecosystemsMarine Ecology Progress Series38201212Google Scholar
  20. Krylova, E.M. 1997

    Abyssal bivalves of the superfamily Cuspidarioidea (Septibranchia) from the Far-Easterrn seas and the North-Western Pacific

    Kuznetzov, A. P.Zezina, O. N. eds. Composition and Distribution of Bottom Invertebrate Animals in the Seas of Russia and Adjacent WatersInstitute of OceanologyMoscow8084
    Google Scholar
  21. Kryger, J., Riisgård, H.U. 1988Filtration rate capacities in 6 species of European freshwater bivalvesOecologia773438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kryuchkova, N.M., Rybak, VH. 1989Patterns of feeding of Moina rectirostris Leydig on phytoplankton of a hypertrophic water body (osobennosti pitaniya Moina rectirostris Leydig fitoplanktonom gipertrofnogo vodoemaHydrobiological Journal (Gidrobiologicheskiy Zhurnal)252831Google Scholar
  23. Migne, A., Davoult, D. 2002Experimental nutrition in the soft coral Alcyonium digitatum (Cnidaria: Octocorallia): removal rate of phytoplankton and zooplanktonCahiers de Biologie Marine43916Google Scholar
  24. Mitin, A., 1984. Effect of some environmental factors on the water-clearing activity of bivalves, Summary of Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Monakov, A.V. 1998Feeding of Freshwater Invertebrates (Pitanie Presnovodnykh Bespozonochnykh)Institute of Ecological and Evolutionary ProblemsMoscow320Google Scholar
  26. Newell, R., 1988. Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica? Understanding the estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research. Proceedings of a Conference. 29–31 March 1988. Baltimore, Maryland. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication 129: 536–546Google Scholar
  27. Ogilvie, S., Mitchell, S. 1995A model of mussel filtration in a shallow New Zealand lake, with reference to eutrophication controlArchiv für Hydrobiologie133471482Google Scholar
  28. Ostroumov, S.A. 1998Biological filtering and ecological machinery for self-purification and bioremediation in aquatic ecosystems: towards a holistic viewRivista di Biologia/Biology Forum91247258Google Scholar
  29. Ostroumov, S. A., 1999. Integrity-oriented approach to ecological biomachinery for self-purification and bioremediation in aquatic ecosystems: stopping an ecological time bomb. Limnology and Oceanography: Navigating into the Next Century. February 1–5, 1999, Santa Fe, New Mexico. ASLO, Waco, TX. 134 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostroumov, S. A., 2000a. Criteria of ecological hazards due to anthropogenic effects on the biota: searching for a system (Kriterii ekologhicheskoj opastnosti antropoghennykh vozdejstvij na biotu: poiski sistemy). Doklady Biological Sciences 371: 204–206 (the Russian edition: Doklady Akademii Nauk 371: 844–846)Google Scholar
  31. Ostroumov, S. A., 2000b. The concept of aquatic biota as a labile and vulnerable component of the water self-purification system (Kontzeptzija vodnoi bioty kak labil’nogo i ujazvimogo zvena sistemy samoochishchenija vody). Doklady Biological Sciences 372: 286–289 (the Russian edition: Doklady Akademii Nauk 372: 279–282)Google Scholar
  32. Ostroumov, S. A., 2000c. Aquatic ecosystem: a large-scale diversified bioreactor with a water self-purification function (Vodnaja ekosistema: krupnorazmernyj diversifitzirovannyj bioreaktor s funktzijej samoochishchenija vody). Doklady Biological Sciences 374: 514–516 (the Russian edition: Doklady Akademii Nauk 374: 427–429)Google Scholar
  33. Ostroumov, S.A. 2001aResponses of Unio tumidus to a mixture of chemicals and the hazard of synecological summation of anthropogenic effects (Reagirovanie Unio tumidus pri vozdeistvii smesevogo himicheskogo preparata i opasnost sinekologicheskogo summirovaniya antropogennyh vozdeistviy)Doklady Akademii Nauk380714717Google Scholar
  34. Ostroumov, S.A. 2001bSynecological foundation for the solution of the problem of eutrophication (Sinekologicheskie osnovy resheniya problemy evtrofirovaniya)Doklady Akademii Nauk381709712Google Scholar
  35. Ostroumov, S.A. 2001cAmphiphilic chemical inhibits the ability of molluscs to filter water and to remove the cells of phytoplankton Izvestia RAN. Seriya Biology (Bulletin of Russian Academy of Sciences, Biology Series)Issue1108116Google Scholar
  36. Ostroumov, S.A. 2002aInhibitory analysis of top-down control: new keys to studying eutrophication, algal blooms, and water self-purificationHydrobiologia469117129Google Scholar
  37. Ostroumov, S.A. 2002bPolyfunctional role of biodiversity in processes leading to water purification: current conceptualizations and concluding remarksHydrobiologia469203204Google Scholar
  38. Ostroumov, S.A. 2002cBiodiversity and water quality: the role of feed-backs (Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya i kachestvo vody: rol obratnykh svyazej v ekosistemakh) Doklady Akademii Nauk382138141Google Scholar
  39. Ostroumov, S.A. 2003Studying effects of some surfactants and detergents on filter-feeding bivalvesHydrobiology500341344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostroumov, S.A. 2003Anthropogenic effects on the biota: towards a new system of principles and criteria for analysis of ecological hazardsRivista di Bilogia/Biology Forum96159169Google Scholar
  41. Ostroumov, S.A., Donkin, P., Staff, F. 1997Inhibition by the anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulphate, of the ability of mussels Mytilus edulis to filter and purify the sea water (Anionnoje poverkhnostno-aktivnoje veshchestvo inghibirujet sposobnost’ midij filtrovat’ i ochishchat’ morskuju vodu)Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 16 Biologija (Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 16. Biology 3)33036Google Scholar
  42. Ostroumov, S.A., Donkin, P., Staff, F. 1998Filtration inhibition induced by two classes of synthetic surfactants in the bivalve mollusc (Narushenije filtracii dvustvorchatymi molluskami pod vozdejstvijem poverkhnostno-aktivnykh veshchestv dvukh klassov)Doklady Akademii Nauk362574576Google Scholar
  43. Ostroumov, S.A., Walz, N., Widdows, J. 2001Measuring activity of filter-feeders: linking organismal and superorganismal levels of hydrobiology and biological oceanographyEcological Studies, Hazards, Solutions52627Google Scholar
  44. Ostroumov, S.A., Dodson, S., Hamilton, D., Peterson, S., Wetzel, RG. 2003Medium-term and long-term priorities in ecological studiesRivista di Biologia/Biology Forum96327332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostroumov, S.A., Walz, N., Rusche, R. 2003Effects of a cationic amphiphilic chemical on rotifersDoklady Akademii Nauk390423426Google Scholar
  46. Petersen, J., Riisgård, H.U. 1992Filtration capacity of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis and its grazing impact in a shallow fjordMarine Ecology Progress Series88917Google Scholar
  47. Pilson, M. 1985On the residence time of water in Narragansett BayEstuaries8214Google Scholar
  48. Rose, R., Warne, M., Lim, L. 2003Exposure to chemicals exuded by fish reduces the filtration and ingestion rates of Ceriodaphnia cf. dubiaHydrobiologia501215217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smaal, A.C., Verhagen, J., Coosen, J., Haas, H. 1986Interactions between seston quantity and quality and benthic feeders in the Oosterschelde, The NetherlandsOphelia26385399Google Scholar
  50. Sorokin, Yu.A, Sorokin, P.Yu, Mamaeva, T. I., Sorokina, OV 1997

    The sea of Okhotsk bacterioplankton and planktonic ciliates

    Sapozhnikov, V. V. eds. Complex studies of ecosystem of the Sea of OkhotskVNIRO PressMoscow210216
    Google Scholar
  51. Shulman, G.E., Finenko, GA. 1990Bioenergetics of Aquatic OrganismsNaukova Dumka PressKiev246Google Scholar
  52. Shuntov V.P. (2001). Biology of Far-Eastern seas of Russia, Vol. 1. TINRO-Centre, Vladivostok, 580 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Starkweather, P., Bogdan, K. 1980Detrital feeding in natural zooplankton communities: discrimination between live and dead algal foodsHydrobiologia738385Google Scholar
  54. Stuijfzand, S.C., Kraak, M.H.S., Wink, Y.A., Davids, C. 1995Short-term effects of nickel on the filtration rate of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorphaBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology54376381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sushchenya, L.M. 1975Quantitative Trends in the Feeding of CrustaceansNauka i Tekhnika PressMinsk208Google Scholar
  56. Tsuchiya M. (1980). Biodeposit production by the mussel Mytilus edulis L. on rocky shores. Journal Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 47: 203–222Google Scholar
  57. Vinogradov, M.E., Shushkina, EA. 1987Functioning of plankton communities of the epipelagial of the oceanNauka PressMoscow240Google Scholar
  58. Widdows, J., Page, D. 1993Effects of tributyltin and dibutyltin on the physiological energetics of the mussel, Mytilus edulisMarine Environmental Research35233249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Widdows, J., Brinsley, M., Salkeld, P., Elliott, M. 1998Use of annular flumes to determine the influence of current vedlocity and bivalves on material flux at the sediment-water interfaceEstuaries21552559Google Scholar
  60. Witte, U., Brattegard, T., Graf, G., Springer, B. 1997Particle capture and depostion by deep-sea sponges from the Norwegian-Greenland SeaMarine Ecology Progress Series154241252Google Scholar
  61. Yablokov, A.V., Ostroumov, SA. 1991Conservation of Living Nature and Resources: Problems, Trends, ProspectsSpringer VerlagBerlin, Heidelberg, New York271Google Scholar
  62. Zankai, N. 1979Jahreszeitliche Änderung der Filtrierrate der Copepoden Eudiaptomus gracilis (G.O.Sars) im Balaton-SeeVerhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie2025512555Google Scholar
  63. Zezina, O. N. 1997

    Brachiopods in a natural bottom biofilter at the shelves and slopes in the Far-Eastern Seas of Russia

    Kuznetzov, A. P.Zezina, O. N. eds. Composition and Distribution of Bottom Invertebrate Animals in the Seas of Russia and Adjacent WatersInstitute of OceanologyMoscow5260
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of BiologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations