Advertisement

Power Technology and Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 418–424 | Cite as

Comparison of Lock Chamber Calculation Methods

  • S. N. Levachev
  • A. G. Gogin
  • A. M. Shaitanov
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Two methodologies for navigable lock chamber calculation are analyzed. Preliminary calculation was performed using the finite element model and Construction Specifications (CS) techniques. The feasibility of calculation using the finite element model was assessed and compared with manual calculation; the advantages and shortcomings of the techniques under consideration were manifested. Conclusions on the expediency of applying this method of lock chamber calculation of a dock design have been reached.

Keywords

numerical modeling finite element method Plaxis stress-strain state lock 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Schanz, Zur Modellierung des mechanischen Verhaltens von Reibungzmaterialien, Mitt. Inst. f. Geotechnik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Schanz, P. A. Vermeer, and P. G. Bonnier, “The Hardening Soil Model: formulation and verification,” in: Beyond 2000 in Computation Geotechnics, Balkema, Rotterdam (1999), pp. 281 – 290.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. M. Duncan and C. Y. Chang, “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils,” ASCE J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 96(5), 1629 –1653 (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. A. Strokova, “Determination of parameters for numerical modeling of behavior of soils,” Izv. Tomsk. Politekh. Univ., 313(1), 69 – 74 (2008).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. I. Golubev and A. V. Seletskii, “Selection of a soil model and its parameters in calculations of geotechnical objects,” in: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on GeotechnicsGeotechnical Issues of Megalopolises‘ (GEOMOS 2010). Vol. 4 [in Russian] (2010), pp. 1727 – 1732.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. V. Sokolova, “Selection of parameters of soil models in the Plaxis 2D software system,” Inzh.-Stroit. Zh., No. 4(48), 10 – 16 (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Wiltafsky, F. Scharinger, and H. F. Schweiger, “Results from a geotechnical benchmark exercise of an embankment on soft clay,” in: Int. Workshop on Geotechnics of Soft Soils-Theory and Practice (2003), pp. 67 – 73.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. B. J. Brinkgreve, “Selection of soil models and parameters for geotechnical engineering application,” in: J. A. Yamamuro and V. N. Kaliakin (eds.), Soil Constitutive Models: Evaluation, Selection and Calibration. Vol. 128, American Society of Civil Engineers (2005), pp. 69 – 98.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PLAXIS. User’s Guide. 2D Version 8 [in Russian] (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. L. Ivanov, Soil and Bases of Hydraulic Engineering Structures [in Russian], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. I. Golubev and A. V. Seletskii, “Complex calculations of hydraulic engineering structures in PLAXIS,” Gidrotekh. XXI Vek, No. 3(6), 16 – 18 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. S. Egorov, A. V. Ioskevich, V. V. Ioskevich, K. N. Agishev, and V. Yu. Kozhevnikov, “Soil models implemented in the SCAD Office and Plaxis 3D software,” Stroit. Unikal. Zdan. Sooruzh., No. 3(42), 31 – 60 (2016).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Calvello and R. J. Finno, “Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis,” Comput. Geotech., 31(5), 420 – 424 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Barla and G. Barla, “Torino subsoil characterization by combining site investigations and numerical modeling,” Geomech. Tunnel., 3, 214 – 232 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. S. Vardanyan, V. I. Andreev, N. M. Atarov, and A. A. Gorshkov, Resistance of Materials with the Foundations of the Theory of Elasticity and Plasticity: Textbook [in Russian], ASV, Moscow (1995).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. N. Smirnov, S. N. Levachev, A. G. Sidorov, and E. A. Korchagin, Ports and Port Structures [in Russian], ASV, Moscow (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Levachev
    • 1
  • A. G. Gogin
    • 1
  • A. M. Shaitanov
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations