Human Physiology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 646–650 | Cite as

Heart Rate Differences between Targets and Nontargets in Intuitive Tasks

  • P. E. Tressoldi
  • M. Martinelli
  • S. Massaccesi
  • L. Sartori


This study reports the results of one experiment and a replication, aimed at investigating heart rate changes related to a purely intuitive task. In each experiment, 12 subjects were required to guess which of four pictures presented in sequence for about 10 s was the target. Each subject performed 20 trials. In each trial, the target was automatically selected using a pseudorandom algorithm. The heart rate was recorded during the picture presentation. In the first experiment, a statistically significant heart rate increment associated with targets with respect to nontargets was observed. The replication experiment with 12 new subjects confirmed the data obtained in the main experiment. These findings support the hypothesis that heart rate is related not only to conscious but also to unconscious cognitive activity such as that involved in intuitive tasks, giving convergent evidence for the models describing human intuitive cognitive activity as a double, partially independent information processing system.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cacioppo, J.T., Klein, D.J., Berntson, G.G. and Hatfiled, E., The Psychophysiology of Emotion, Handbook of Emotions, Lewis, M. and Haviland, J.M., Eds., New York: Guilford, 1993, p. 119.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palomba, D., Angrilli, A., and Mini, A., Visual Evoked Potentials, Heart Rate Responses and Memory to Emotional Stimuli, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, vol. 27, p. 55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zajonc, R.B. and Mcintosh, D.N., Emotions Research: Some Promising Questions and Some Questionable Promises, Psychol. Sci., 1992, vol. 3, p. 70.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham, F.K. and Clifton, R.K., Heart Rate Change As Component of the Orienting Response, Psychol. Bull., 1966, vol. 65, p. 305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanh, W.W., Attention and Heart Rate: A Critical Appraisal of the Hypothesis of Lacey and Lacey, Psychol. Bull., 1973, vol. 79, p. 59.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coles, M.G.H. and Duncan-Johnson, C.C., Cardiac Activity and Information Processing: The Effect of Stimulus Significance and Detection an Response Requirement, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Perception Performance, 1975, vol. 1, p. 418.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwartz, G.E., Cardiac Response to Self-Induced Thoughts, Psychophysiology, 1971, vol. 8, p. 463.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gellatly, I.R. and Meyer, J.P., The Effects of Goal Difficulty on Physiological Arousal, Cognition, and Task Performance, J. Appl. Psychol., 1992, vol. 77, no.5, p. 694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaughan, F.E., Awakening Intuition, Garden City, New York: Anchor, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shirley, D.A. and Langan-Fox, J., Intuition: A Review of the Literature, Psychol. Rec., 1996, vol. 9, p. 553.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baylor, A.L., A Three-Component Conception of Intuition: Immediacy, Sensing Relationships and Reason, New Ideas Psychol., 1997, vol. 12, no.2, p. 185.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanovich, K.E. and West, R.F., Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implication For the Rationality Debate, Behav. Brain Sci., 2000, vol. 23, p. 645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lieberman, M.D., Intuition: A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach, Psychol. Bull., 2000, vol. 126, no.1, p. 109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A.R., Failure to Respond to Anticipated Future Outcomes Following Damage to Prefrontal Cortex, Cerebral Cortex, 1996, vol. 6, no.2, p. 215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A.R., Deciding Advantageously before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy, Science, 1997, vol. 275, p. 1293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 6.
    Blanchard, E.B., Wulfert, E., Freidenberg, B.M., et al., Psychophysiological Assessment of Compulsive Gamblers' Arousal to Gambling Cues: A Pilot Study, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2000, vol. 25, no.3, p. 155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyer, G., Hauffa, B.P., Schedlowski, M., et al., Casino Gambling Increases Heart Rate and Salivary Cortisol in Regular Gamblers, Biol. Psychiatry, 2000, vol. 48, no.9, p. 948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharpe, L., Tarrier, N., Schotte, D., and Spence, S.H., The Role of Autonomic Arousal in Problem Gambling, Addiction, 1995, vol. 90, p. 1529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massaccesi, S., Un sistema modulare portatile per la rilevazione dell'attivita elettrodermica e della frequenza cardiaca (A Portable Modular System for Electrodermic and Heart Rate Acquisition), Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 2001, vol. 4, p. 825.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunlap, W.P., Cortina, J.M., Valow, J.B., and Burke, M.J., Meta-Analysis of Experimental Data with Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs, Psychol. Methods, 1996, vol. 1, no.2, p. 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blair, R.C. and Karniski, W., an Alternative Method for Significance Testing of Waveform Difference Potentials, Psychophysiology, 1993, vol. 30, p. 518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peladeau, N. and Lacoutre, Y., SIMSTAT: Bootstrap Computer Simulation and Statistical Program for IBM Personal Computer, Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Computer, 1993, vol. 25, no.3, p. 410.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Tressoldi
    • 1
  • M. Martinelli
    • 1
  • S. Massaccesi
    • 1
  • L. Sartori
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations