Advertisement

Human Physiology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 188–194 | Cite as

Change in the power of EEG activity in the α range in response to tonic nociceptive stimulation of the distal joint of the little finger

  • V. V. Garkavenko
  • A. V. Gorkovenko
  • E. P. Man’kovskaya
  • A. N. Shevko
  • E. B. Lyskov
  • A. I. Kostyukov
Article

Abstract

Examination of 12 healthy volunteers aged 20–56 years was performed to study the EEG changes caused by a tonic squeeze of the distal joint of the little finger of the left and then the right hand. This stimulation caused painful sensations of different intensity (pain on the right was stronger). Spectral power was measured in the (α 1 (8–10.5 Hz) and (α2 ranges (10.5–13 Hz) under different conditions. Weak pain led to an increase in the power of the (α1 and α2 ranges in the occipital regions. With strong pain, the power of α1 waves increased bilaterally in the posterior regions (O1, O2, T6), as well as in the left frontal region (F3, F7). The powers of the α1 and α2 ranges substantially increased relative to the background level after the strong nociceptive stimulation ceased. This finding testified to a latent and inertial character of its effect on the α-wave parameters.

Keywords

Healthy Volunteer Human Physiology Background Level Spectral Power Frontal Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Chang, P.F., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Graven-Nielsen, T., et al., Different EEG Topographic Effects of Painful and Nonpainful Intramuscular Stimulation in Man, Exp. Brain Res., 1996, vol. 141, no.2, p. 195.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Pera, D., Svensson, P., Valeriani, M., et al., Long-Lasting Effect Evoked by Tonic Muscle Pain on Parietal EEG Activity in Humans, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2000, vol. 111, issue12, p. 2130.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferracuti, S., Seri, S., Mattia, D., and Cruccu, G., Quantitative EEG Modifications during the Cold Water Pressor Test: Hemispheric and Hand Differences, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1994, vol. 17, no.3, p. 261.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backonja, M., Howland, E.W., Wang, J., et al., Tonic Changes in α Power during Immersion of the Hand in Cold Water, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, vol. 79, no.3, p. 192.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, P.F., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Graven-Nielsen, T., et al., Topographic Effects of Tonic Cutaneous Nociceptive Stimulation on Human Electroencephalogram, Neurosci. Lett., 2001, vol. 305, no.1, p. 49.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ray, W.J. and Cole H.W., EEG α Activity Reflects Attentional Demands and β Activity Reflects Emotional and Cognitive Processes, Science, 1985, vol. 228, no.6, p. 750.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez da Silva, F.H., Neural Mechanisms Underlying Brain Waves: From Neural Membranes to Networks, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, vol. 79, no.1, p. 81.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfurtscheller, G. and Aranibar, A., Event-Related Cortical Desynchronization Detected by Power Measurements of Scalp EEG, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1977, vol. 42, no.7, p. 817.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bromm, B. and Lorenz, J., Neurophysiological Evaluation of Pain, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, vol. 107, no.3, p. 227.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, P.F., Arendt-Nielsen, L., and Chen, A.C., Dynamic Changes and Spatial Correlation of EEG Activities during Cold Pressor Test in Man, Brain Res. Bull., 2002, vol. 57, no.5, p. 667.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldman, R.I., Stern, J.M., Engel, J., and Cohen, M.S., Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the α Rhythm, Neuroreport, 2002, vol. 13, no.18, p. 2487.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook, I.A., O’Hara, R., Uijtdehaage, S.H.J., et al., Assessing the Accuracy of Topographic EEG Mapping for Determining Local Brain Function, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, vol. 107, no.3, p. 408.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stea, R.A. and Apkarian, A.V., Pain and Somatosensory Activation: Trends, Neuroscience, 1992, vol.15, no 2, p. 250.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R.K., Paus, T., et al., Cerebral Mechanisms of Hypnotic Induction and Suggestion, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1999, vol. 11, no.1, p. 110.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petsche, H., Kaplan, S., Von Stein, A., and Filz, O., The Possible Meaning of the Upper and Lower α Frequency Ranges for Cognitive and Creative Tasks, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, vol. 26, no.1, p. 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Garkavenko
    • 1
  • A. V. Gorkovenko
    • 1
  • E. P. Man’kovskaya
    • 1
  • A. N. Shevko
    • 1
  • E. B. Lyskov
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. I. Kostyukov
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Bogomolets Institute of PhysiologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine
  2. 2.Institute of the Human BrainRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Musculoskeletal Research CenterUniversity of GávleUmeáSweden

Personalised recommendations