Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 501–518 | Cite as

Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication

  • Ilja SrubarEmail author
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Abstract

Religion and violence are related in an ambivalent, paradoxical way, for the systems of religious knowledge tend to prohibit violence and to motivate it at the same time. This paper looks for the roots of that ambivalence and reveals particular mechanisms that generate violence within religious systems and their associated practices. It argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the “sacred,” it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics.

Keywords

Religion Violence Structures of the lifeworld Communication Inclusion Exclusion Discourse Semantics 

References

  1. Abulafia, D. (2011). The great sea. A human history of the Mediterranean. London: Lane.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alito, G. (1992). Orthodoxie in der chinesischen Kultur. In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Kulturen der Achsenzeit, Bd. II.1: China, Japan (pp. 126–175). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  3. Angenendt, A. (2009). Toleranz und Gewalt. Christentum zwischen Bibel und Schwert. Münster: Aschendorf.Google Scholar
  4. Arnason, J., Eisenstadt, S. N., & Wittrock, B. (Eds.). (2005). Axial civilizations and world history. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Assmann, J. (1998). The memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baudler, G. (1991). Gott und Frau. Die Geschichte von Gewalt, Sexualität und Religion. Munich: Kösel.Google Scholar
  7. Baudler, G. (2005). Gewalt in den Weltreligionen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  8. Behn, I. (1957). Spanische Mystik. Darstellung und Deutung. Düsseldorf: Patmos.Google Scholar
  9. Bellah, R. N. (2011). Religion in human evolution. From the paleolithic to the axial age. Cambridge, Mass., London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. (1991). Die Masken Gottes. Bd.II: Mythologie des Ostens. Basel: Sphinx.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1992). The force of law. NewYork/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (2002). Acts of religion. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (1992a). Kulturen der Achsenzeit, Bd. II.1: China, Japan. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (1992b). Kulturen der Achsenzeit, Bd. II.2: Indien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Eliade, M. (1998). The sacred and the profane. The nature of religion (W. R. Task, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace & Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Erbstösser, Martin. (1970). Sozialreligiöse Strömungen im späten Mittelalter. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Fürst, A. (Ed.). (2006). Friede auf Erden? Religionen zwischen Gewalt und Gewaltbereitschaft. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  20. Gerlitz, Peter (1954). Fasten im religionsgeschichtlichen Vergleich, PhD thesis, University Erlangen.Google Scholar
  21. Girard, R. (1981). Violence and the sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goody, Jack. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gougaud, L. (1925). Dévotions et practiques ascétiques du moyen age. Paris: Abbaye de Maredsous.Google Scholar
  24. Greyerz, K. V., & Siebenhüner, K. (Eds.). (2006). Religion und Gewalt. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  25. Guttmann, H.-M. (2009). Gewaltunterbrechung, Warum Religion Gewalt nicht hervorbringt, sondern bindet. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
  26. Hafner, J. E. (2008). Victime und Sacrifice. In B. Oberdorfer & P. Waldmann (Eds.), Die Ambivalenz des Religiösen (pp. 77–104). Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
  27. Heesterman, J. C. (1992). Ein geteiltes Haus: hinduistisch-muslimische Beziehung. In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Kulturen der Achsenzeit, Bd. II.2: Indien (pp. 275–293). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  28. Hunger, H. (1984). Die Heilige Hochzeit. Vorgeschichtliche Sexualkulte und –mythen. Wiesbaden: Verlag Medical Tribune.Google Scholar
  29. Juergensmayer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of god. The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: Universitty of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Juergensmeyer, M. (Ed.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of global religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kalisch, M. (2006). Monotheismus des Islam und die Problematik von Toleranz und Gewalt. In A. Fürst (Ed.), Friede auf Erden? Religionen zwischen Gewalt und Gewaltbereitschaft (pp. 151–166). Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  32. Khoury, A.-T. (1976). Die Gewalt in der Lehre und im Leben der Buddhisten. In E. Kroker (Ed.), Die Gewalt in Politik, Religion und Gesellschaft (pp. 123–138). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  33. Kippenberg, H. G. (2011). Violence as worship. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Koselleck, R. (Ed.). (1979). Zur historisch-politischen Semantik asymmetrischer Gegenbegriffe. In Vergangene Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  35. Kroker, E. J. M. (Ed.). (1976). Die Gewalt in Politik, Religion und Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  36. Lal, V. (2006). Intolerance for Hindu tolerance: Hinduism, religious violence in pre-modern India, and the fate of a ‘modern’ discourse. In K. V. Greyerz & K. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Religion und Gewalt (pp. 51–84). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  37. Lambert, M. D. (1977). Medieval Heresy. London: Erward Arnold.Google Scholar
  38. Luckmann, Th. (1967). The invisible religion. New York: Mac Millan.Google Scholar
  39. Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  40. Luhmann, N. (2002). Die Religion der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  41. Maffesoli, Michel. (1982). L’ombre de Dionysos. Contribution à une s ociologie de l’ orgie. Paris: Méridiens/Anthropos.Google Scholar
  42. Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science and religion and other essays. Gardens City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  43. Mannheim, Karl. (1991). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Matthes, J. (Ed.). (1992). The operation called ‘Vergleichen’. In Zwischen den Kulturen? Die Sozialwissenschaften vor dem Problem des Kulturvergleichs (Soziale Welt, Sonderband 8) (pp. 75–99). Göttingen: Schwartz.Google Scholar
  45. Métral, M.-O. (1981). Die Ehe. Die Analyse einer Institution. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Müller, W. (1970). Glauben und Denken der Sioux. Zur Gestalt archaischer Weltbilder. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
  47. Oberdorfer, B., & Waldmann, P. (Eds.). (2008). Die Ambivalenz des Religiösen. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
  48. Otto, R. (1979). Das Heilige. Munich: Beck [Engl. Trans. by J. W. Harvey: The idea of the holy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1959].Google Scholar
  49. Parsons, T. (1966). Societies. Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Pollock, S. (2005). Axialism and empire. In J. P. Arnason, S. N. Eisenstadt, & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Axial civilizations and world history (pp. 397–450). Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  51. Rotter, E., & Rotter, G. (2002). Geschichte der Lust—zwischen Himmel und Hölle. Düsseldorf: Patmos.Google Scholar
  52. Rzepkowski, H. (1976). Die Gewalt in der Lehre und im Leben der Hindus. In E. Kroker (Ed.), Die Gewalt in Politik, Religion und Gesellschaft (pp. 139–149). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  53. Sahlins, M. (1981). Historical metaphors and mythical realities: Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sahlins, M. (1986). Tod des Kapitän Cook. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  55. Scheler, M. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
  56. Schieder, R. (2008). Sind Religionen gefährlich?. Berlin: Berlin University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schutz, A. (Ed.). (1962a). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of social action. In Collected papers, Vol. I: The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  60. Schutz, A. (Ed.). (1962b). Symbol, reality and society. In Collected papers, Vol. I: The problem of social reality (pp. 287–356). Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  61. Schutz, A. (Ed.). (1962c). On multiple realities. In Collected papers, Vol. I: The problem of social reality (pp. 207–259). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  62. Schutz, A. (Ed.). (1964). The stranger. An essay in social psychology. In Collected papers, Vol. II: Studies in social theory (pp. 207–259). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  63. Schutz, A. (Ed.). (2003). Das Problem der Personalität in der Sozialwelt. In Werkausgabe, Vol. V 1A: Theorie der Lebenswelt 1. Die pragmatische Schichtung der Lebenswelt (pp. 95–162). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  64. Shichor, Y. (1992). Konfuzianismus in einem land: Einige Betrachtungen zur universalistischen und partikularistischen Kollektividentität in China. In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Kulturen der Achsenzeit, Bd. II.1: China, Japan (pp. 91–107). Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  65. Shulman, D. (1992). Die Dynamik der Sektenbildung im mittelalterlichen Südindien. In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Kulturen der Achsenzeit Bd. II.2: Indien (pp. 102–128). Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, W. C. (1967). Questions of religious truth. London: Golancz.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, W. C. (1978). The meaning and end of religion. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  68. Speyer, A. V. (1970). Das Wort und die Mystik. Part II.: Objektive Mystik. Johannes Verlag: Einsiedeln.Google Scholar
  69. Srubar, I. (2014). Gewalt als asemiotische Kommunikation. In M. Staudigl (Hg) (Ed.), Gesichter der Gewalt (pp. 74–86). München: Fink.Google Scholar
  70. Steinach, U. (1976). Die Gewalt im Islam. In E. Kroker (Ed.), Die Gewalt in Politik, Religion und Gesellschaft (pp. 150–178). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  71. Stobbe, H.-G. (2010). Religion, Gewalt und Krieg. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  72. Voegelin, E. (Ed.). (2000a). The new science of politics. In Modernity without restraints (collected works) (Vol. 5, pp. 77–241). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Voegelin, E. (Ed.). (2000b). The political religions. In Modernity without restraints (collected works) (Vol. 5, pp. 19–73). Columbia and London: Univ. of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  74. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (E. Fischoff et al., Berkeley et al. Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wilke, A. (2006). Gewaltlosigkeit und Gewaltausübung in Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Tamilische Devotion, Singhalesischer Buddhismus und die Macht der Repräsentation. In A. Fürst (Ed.), Friede auf Erden? Religionen zwischen Gewalt und Gewaltbereitschaft (pp. 83–150). Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  76. Wittrock, B. (2005). The meaning of the axial age. In J. P. Arnason, S. N. Eisenstadt, & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Axial civilizations and world history. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  77. Worsley, Peter. (1957). The trumpet shall sound: A study of “cargo cults” in Melanesia. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations