Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 223–241 | Cite as

Between Phenomenology and Hermeneutics: Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophy of Imagination

  • Saulius GeniusasEmail author
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Abstract

I argue that imagination has an inherently paradoxical structure: it enables one to flee one’s socio-cultural reality and to constitute one’s socio-cultural world. I maintain that most philosophical accounts of the imagination leave this paradox unexplored. I further contend that Paul Ricoeur is the only thinker to have addressed this paradox explicitly. According to Ricoeur, to resolve this paradox, one needs to recognize language as the origin of productive imagination. This paper explores Ricoeur’s solution by offering a detailed study of reproductive and productive imagination in the framework of poetic imagination. My analysis subjects Ricoeur’s distinction between reproductive and productive imagination to a critique that relies upon the principles of classical phenomenology. According to my central thesis, the imaginative powers of language are themselves rooted in perception. This thesis broadens the scope and significance of Ricoeur’s solution by enabling one to resolve the paradox of imagination not only at the level of language-based imagination, but also at the level of dreams and daydreaming as well as at the level of non-language based art. No less significantly, this thesis enables one to open a fresh dialogue between phenomenology and hermeneutics.

Keywords

Productive and reproductive imagination Phenomenology Hermeneutics Metaphor Fiction 

References

  1. Aristotle. (2001). Poetics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of aristotle. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space (Maria Jolas, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Busch, T. (1997). Sartre and Ricoeur on imagination. The American Catholic philosophical quarterly, LXX(4), 507–518.Google Scholar
  4. Castoriadis, C. (1997). Radical imagination and the social instituting imaginary. The Castoriadis reader (pp. 319–337). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Green, J., & Karolides, N. (2009). Encyclopedia of censorship. New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (David C., Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, image-consciousness, and memory in 18981925 (Brough J. B., Trans.) Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Kazantsakis, N. (1998). The last temptation of Christ (Bien P. A., Trans.). New York: Scribner Paperback Fiction.Google Scholar
  9. Lennon, K. (2010). Re-enchanting the world: The role of imagination in perception. Philosophy, 85(3), 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levy, L. (2014). Sartre and Ricoeur on productive imagination. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 52(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lloydd, G. (2008). Providence lost. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993a). Cézanne’s doubt. In G. Johnson (Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader: philosophy and painting (pp. 59–75) (M. Smith. Evanston, Trans.). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993b). Eye and Mind. In G. Johnson (Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader: philosophy and painting (pp. 121–149). (M. Smith. Evanston, Trans.). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ricoeur, P. (1977). The rule of metaphor (R. Czerny, Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ricoeur, P. (1978). The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ricoeur, P. (1979). The function of fiction in shaping reality. Man and World, 12(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ricoeur, P. (1986). In G. Taylor (Ed.), Lectures on ideology and utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ricoeur, P. (1991). Imagination in discourse and action (K. Blamey & J. B. Thompson, Trans.). From text to action (pp. 168–87) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sartre, J. P. (1962). The imagination (F. Williams, Trans.). Ann Arbot: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sartre, J. P. (2004). The imaginary: A phenomenological psychology of the imagination. (J. Webber, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Spinoza, B. (2002). In M. L. Morgan. (Ed.), (S. Shirley, Trans.). Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  22. Stawarska, B. (2005). Defining imagination: Sartre between Husserl and Janet. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, G. (2006). Ricoeur’s philosophy of imagination. Journal of French Philosophy, 16(1), 93–104.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, G. (2013a). Ricoeur’s lectures on imagination, keynote presentation at the conference, Paul Ricoeur et la philosophie contemporaine de langue anglaise, Paris, Nov. 20.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, G. (2013b). Prospective Identity. In F. Nascimento & W. Salles (Eds.). Ética, Identidade e Reconhecimento Na Obra de Paul Ricoeur. Editora PUC-Rio & Ediçoes Loyola.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyChinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations