Human Studies

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 259–275 | Cite as

Fallibility and Insight in Moral Judgment

Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between moral judgments, fallibility, and imaginative insight. It will draw heavily from the canon of classical American philosophy, the members of which (from Ralph Waldo Emerson, to C.S. Peirce, E.L. Cabot, to Jane Addams, to John Dewey) took up this relationship as pivotally important in moral theorizing. It argues that the process of hypothesis formation—characterized as “insight” by Emerson and extended by Peirce in his notion of “abduction”—is a necessary condition of moral progress for it allows individuals to think through the boundaries of social and ethical life. In a world of unexpected occurrences and uncertainty, the ability to generate novel explanatory frameworks and normative ideals is a crucial, if normally underappreciated, moral faculty. This paper attempts to respond to this relative neglect.

Keywords

Ethics Abduction Peirce Fallibility Insight Moral progress 

References

  1. Anderson, D. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C.S. Peirce. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (2012). Aristotle’s nichomachean ethics. Translated by Robert Barlett and Susan Collins. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, R. (1965). Perspectives on peirce. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cabot, E. L. (1891). Notes on Royce’s Course. In Papers of Ella Lyman Cabot. Schlesinger Library. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Harvard University. Collection Number A-139.Google Scholar
  5. Cabot, E. L. (1900). Individuality. In Papers of Ella Lyman Cabot. Schlesinger Library. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study Harvard University. Collection Number A-139.Google Scholar
  6. Cabot, E. L. (1906). Everyday ethics. New York: Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Cabot, E. L. (1908). April–July 1908; includes diary entries 1910, 1914. In Papers of Ella Lyman Cabot. Schlesinger Library. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Harvard University. Collection Number A-139.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1986/1934). Art as experience. In J. A. Boydson (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 19251953 (Vol. 12, p. 277). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, R. W. (1909). Journals. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Gert, B. (2004). Common morality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hintikka, J. (1999). Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintikka, J. (2007). Socratic epistemology: Explorations of knowledge seeking by questioning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, W. (1904). Is life worth living?. Philadelphia: Burns Co.Google Scholar
  14. James, W. (1921). “Percept and concept—some corollaries”. Some problems in Philosophy. New York: Longmans Green and Co.Google Scholar
  15. Kaag, J. (2011). Idealism, pragmatism, feminism: The philosophy of Ella Lyman Cabot. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kaag, J., & Kreps, S. (2012). Pragmatism’s contributions to international relations. Cambridge Review of International Relations, 25(2), 191–208.Google Scholar
  17. Levi, A. (2012). Pragmatism and inquiry: Selected essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Peirce, C. S. (1966). Selected writings of Charles S. Peirce (Values in a Universe of Chance). Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  19. Peirce, C. S. (1987). Collected papers of Charles sanders Peirce (Vol. 5). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  20. Plato. (2012). A Plato reader: Eight essential dialogues. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. New York: Hackett.Google Scholar
  21. Schopenhauer, A. (1891). Studies in pessimism. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, P. (1972). Famine affluence and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 229–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations