Human Studies

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 431–449 | Cite as

Forgiveness in Marriage: Healing or Chronicity. A Dialog Between a Philosophical and a Psychotherapeutic Understanding

  • María del Rosario González MartínEmail author
  • Martiño Rodríguez González
  • Gonzalo Génova Fuster
Special Issue


Based on experience in marriage counseling and contributions made by philosophy of phenomenology and psychology, we have carried out an in-depth analysis of the forgiveness process in the marriage relationship. Philosophy of phenomenology allows to define the conceptual framework of the marriage relationship and its essential features, which gives the therapist a reference to guide the therapeutical process. The description of the process is enriched with contributions of Psychology and particularly Systemic Family Theories. We have identified a number of steps in the forgiveness process, which can be summarized as the passing from the initial pain, through the recovery of dignity and hope, up to the final consciousness of having reached forgiveness, where the intrapersonal process in the offended spouse is imbricated with the interpersonal relationship with the partner in marriage. This interdisciplinary perspective, bringing together clinical practice, philosophy of phenomenology, and psychology, has proven particularly fruitful: it has allowed us to identify when forgiveness becomes a case of regeneration and strengthening of the bonds of marriage, or on the contrary, the cases in which the problems, together with situations of imbalance or relational pathology progress to a chronic state. Apart from this, we have reflected upon the practical application of this theoretical approach in a therapeutic context with couples that need to pass through the forgiveness process, paying special attention to the risks they may encounter. Finally, we suggest possibilities for further investigations along these interdisciplinary lines of study.


Forgiveness Marriage Couple therapy Phenomenology Psychology 



Mr. Martiño Rodríguez has been able to carry out this piece of research thanks to the Maria Barbeito predoctoral grant awarded by the XUNTA DE GALICIA (Galician Regional Government).


  1. Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boon, S., & Sulsky, L. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19–45.Google Scholar
  3. Buber, M. (1969). Yo y tú. [I and thou] (H. Crespo, trad.). Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
  4. Bui, K., Peplau, L., & Hill, C. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1244–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabral, A. (2009). El perdón y lo imperdonable en la cura analítica [Forgiveness and the unforgivable in the analytic treatment]. Revista de psicoanálisis, 66, 555–568.Google Scholar
  6. Crespo, M. (2004). El perdón. Una investigación filosófica [Forgiveness: A philosophical research]. Madrid: Encuentro.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1998). Justicia y perdón [Justice and Forgiveness]. N.d.
  8. Derrida, J. (2001). Cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Enright, R. D. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Enright, R. D. (1994). Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity? Human Development, 37, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenell, D. L. (1993). Characteristics of longer-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling, 15, 446–460.Google Scholar
  12. Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2005). Til lack of forgiveness doth us part: Forgiveness in marriage. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 207–226). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with a betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González, M. R. (2004). Relaciones familiares y desarrollo personal, cuidado y plenitud. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (1998). Understanding betrayals in marriage: A synthesized model of forgiveness. Family Process, 37, 425–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00425.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2005). Forgiveness in couples: Divorce, infidelity, and couples therapy. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 407–422). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Gottman, J. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Mauger, P. A., Perry, J. E., Freeman, T., Grove, D. C., & McKinney, K. E. (1992). The measurement of forgiveness: Preliminary research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170–180.Google Scholar
  19. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nedoncelle, M. (1996). La reciprocidad de las conciencias [The reciprocity of consciences]. Madrid: Caparrós.Google Scholar
  21. Ricoeur, P. (1996). Sí mismo como otro [Oneself as another]. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  22. Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–205). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Seifert, J. (2004). Prólogo. In M. Crespo (Ed.), El perdón. Una investigación filosófica [Forgiveness: A philosophical research]. Madrid: Encuentro.Google Scholar
  24. Toussaint, L. L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Theoretical and empirical connections between forgiveness, mental health, and well-being. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 340–362). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Toussaint, L. L., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Everson, S. A. (2001). Forgiveness and health: Age differences in a US probability sample. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 249–257. doi: 10.1023/A:1011394629736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaillant, G. E. (2002). Aging well. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  27. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, S. (1981). Teoría de la Comunicación Humana [Pragmatics of human communication]. Herder: Barcelona.Google Scholar
  28. Witvliet, C. V., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 12, 117–123. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolberg, A. R. (1973). The borderline patient. New York: Intercontinental Medical Book Co.Google Scholar
  30. Worthington, E. L. (2005). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • María del Rosario González Martín
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martiño Rodríguez González
    • 2
  • Gonzalo Génova Fuster
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Teoría e Historia de la Educación, Facultad de Educación y Centro de Formación del ProfesoradoUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Informática, Escuela Politécnica SuperiorUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganés, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations