Human Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 2–3, pp 281–286

Peter McHugh: A Memoir of the Passion of Theorizing

Memorial Paper
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is a personal and theoretic commemoration of Peter McHugh’s life and commitment through the prism of the writer’s discovery of, and involvement in, the effort from the late 1960s to diagnose and respond to “the failure of positivism” in sociology. Peter’s work (with that of Alan Blum) formed a central component of that effort. I trace the genealogy of Peter’s teaching and conversational practice, to his roots in ethnomethodology and his involvement with Harold Garfinkel. This is followed by an account of how Peter developed and transformed the ethnomethodological impulse, from the “uninterestingly” enforceable towards the invitation to share in the discovery and reconstruction of interest. The paper concludes by situating the time that is its focus, acknowledging the depth of Peter’s impact, and opening for future engagement the subsequent development of his work, in the context of various debates and questions (briefly alluded to) that form a part of the life of theorizing in the early twenty-first century.

Keywords

Ethnomethodology Formation of community Formulation, the “sayable” Interest/the uninteresting Reflexivity of community Measure, moderation/immoderation Spirited discourse, spiritedness Theory, theoretic, theorizing, the theoretic life 

References

  1. Blum, A. (1974). Theorizing. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, A., & McHugh, P. (1984). Self-reflection in the arts and sciences. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dallmayr, F. et al. (n.d.). Self-reflection in the human sciences. Edmonton: Faculty of Education, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Desmond, W. (2005). Religious imagination and the counterfeit doubles of God. In Is there a Sabbath for thought? Between religion and philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Garfield, J. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Malden: Polity/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations, 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. McHugh, P., et al. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Plato Parmenides in Plato (1961). Collected dialogues. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Plato Republic in Plato (1961). Collected dialogues. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zizek, S. (2005). Interrogating the real. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Zizek, S., & Milbank, J. (2009). The monstrosity of Christ. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WhitehorseCanada

Personalised recommendations