Human Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 33–51 | Cite as

Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author

  • Antonio CalcagnoEmail author
Research Paper


This article focuses on Michel Foucault’s concepts of authorship and power. Jacques Derrida has often been accused of being more of a literary author than a philosopher or political theorist. Richard Rorty complains that Derrida’s views on politics are not pragmatic enough; he sees Derrida’s later work, including his political work, more as a “private self-fashioning” than concrete political thinking aimed at devising short-term solutions to problems here and now. Employing Foucault’s work around authorship and the origins of power, I show that Derrida is indeed fashioning himself. This self-fashioning is not merely private or fanciful. Rather, I argue that Derrida can be read as employing what Foucault would call “technologies of the self” to not only show the play of possibility and impossibility at work in all politics and thought, but also to use his savoir to create two important and potentially constructive power structures. First, there is the power of deconstruction itself as a “militant critique” that calls for a forceful and irreducible justice. Second, there is the power of Derrida himself, understood as leaving behind a legacy of himself as the “originator” of deconstruction and as a public intellectual.


Foucault Derrida Authorship Authorial and political power Critique 


  1. Abu-Jamal, M., & Derrida, J. (1999). En direct du couloirs de la mort. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. (1990). Death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142–148). New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  3. Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (with Jürgen Habermas). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borradori, G. (2004). Le “concept” du 11 septembre: Dialogues à New York (octobre-décembre 2001). Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, S. (1998). The death and return of the author: Criticism and subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Calcagno, A. (2007a). Badiou and Derrida: Politics, events and their time. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Calcagno, A. (2007b). On the rates of differentiation: Derrida on political thinking. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, 11(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
  8. Chanter, T. (2006). Gender: Key concepts in philosophy. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Cixous, H. (2008). Insister of Jacques Derrida (P. Kamuf, Ed. Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cixous, H., & Derrida, J. (2001). Veils (G. Bennington, Ed. Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1973). “Speech and phenomena” and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (D. B. Allison, Ed. Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Ed. Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1978). Cogito and the history of madness. In Writing and difference (A. Bass, Ed. Trans.). (pp. 31–63) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (1985). Difference. Margins of philosophy (A. Bass, Ed. Trans.). (pp. 1–34) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, J. (1994). To do justice to Freud”: The history of madness in the age of psychoanalysis. Critical Inquiry, 20(Winter), 227–266. In A. I. Davidson (Ed.), Reprinted in Foucault and his interlocutors 1997 (pp. 57–96). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (1996). Remarks on deconstruction and pragmatism. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism (pp. 77–87). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, J. (1997). Politics of friendship (G. Collins, Ed. Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. (2000). Of hospitality (R. Bowlby, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Derrida, J. (2001a). Foi et savoir. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  20. Derrida, J. (2001b). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness (M. Dooley & M. Hughes, Trans.). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Derrida, J. (2002a). Acts of religion. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Derrida, J. (2002b). Ethics, institutions, and the right to philosophy (P. P. Trifonas, Trans.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Derrida, J. (2003). Voyous. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  24. Derrida, J. (2004). Rogues. (P.-A. Brault & M. Naas, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Enns, D. (2007). Speaking of freedom: Philosophy, politics and the struggle for liberation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, J. S. (1999). What is an oeuvre? Foucault and literature. Configurations, 7(2), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flynn, B. (1989). Derrida and Foucault. In H. J. Silverman (Ed.), Derrida and deconstruction (pp. 201–218). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1970). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1975). My body, this paper, this fire. Oxford Literary Review, 4 (Autumn), 5–28.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? (D. Bouchard, D. Bouchard & S. Simon, Ed. Trans.). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca (pp. 113–138) NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits, IV. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (1997). Writing the self. (A. I. Davidson, A. Hobart, Ed. Trans.). Foucault and his interlocutors (pp. 234–248). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gordon, N. (1999). Foucault’s subject: An ontological reading. Polity, 31(3), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harrison, W. C. (2007). Madness and historicity: Foucault and Derrida, Artaud and Descartes. History of the Human Sciences, 20(4), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobson, M., & Hostilities, hostages. (2006). On some part of Derrida’s reception. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 10, 303–314.Google Scholar
  37. Lawlor, L. (2002). Derrida and Husserl: The basic problem of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lawlor, L. (2007). This is not sufficient: An essay in animality and human nature in Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mclaren, M. A. (2006). From practices of the self to politics: Foucault and friendship. Philosophy Today, 50, 195–201.Google Scholar
  40. Naas, M. (1997). Derrida’s watch/Foucault’s pendulum. Philosophy Today, 41(1), 141–152.Google Scholar
  41. Ophir, A., & Mazali, R. (2005). The order of evils: Toward an ontology of morals (H. Carel, Ed. Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  42. Rorty, R. (1996). Remarks on deconstruction and pragmatism. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism (pp. 13–18). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Sprinkler, M. (2008). Textual politics: Foucault and Derrida. Boundary 2, 8(3), 75–98.Google Scholar
  44. Waldenfels, B. (1996). Order in the twilight (D. J. Parent, Ed. Trans.). Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyKing’s University College at UWOLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations